Sounds like Yamaha!stag wrote:...It was very hard to understand and use, but it was like having a YAMAHA mixer in the box.
How is one supposed to try Cubase???
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 20 Mar, 2005 from Newcastle, UK
Whatever anyone says, there is a Cubase SX demo.
As I wrote in a post a couple of weeks ago, I found some tutorial books in my local library which include the Cubase dem disc. I have it installed on my PC and am learning to use cubase from that. All the features are useable but save and import are disabled. A search on Amazon, or somewhere, should turn these books up.
As I wrote in a post a couple of weeks ago, I found some tutorial books in my local library which include the Cubase dem disc. I have it installed on my PC and am learning to use cubase from that. All the features are useable but save and import are disabled. A search on Amazon, or somewhere, should turn these books up.
-
- KVRist
- 61 posts since 25 Dec, 2003 from Finland & Luxembourg
What does people mean when they say "Sonar is so American"? I have seen that comment a lot in different Cubase vs Sonar threads.
Btw. Cubase is great, but its way too German.
Btw. Cubase is great, but its way too German.
I am Locust. f**k to you!
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Still...funny way of providing a demo...Do you need a dongle and is that version 3?offthewall wrote:Whatever anyone says, there is a Cubase SX demo.
As I wrote in a post a couple of weeks ago, I found some tutorial books in my local library which include the Cubase dem disc. I have it installed on my PC and am learning to use cubase from that. All the features are useable but save and import are disabled. A search on Amazon, or somewhere, should turn these books up.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Sigh...Is there any way to prevent Cubase threads from turning into every other Cubase thread?
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 6 Mar, 2001 from London, UK
Write them with a key protected dongle on the meaning. That way you won't ever have to read anything you don't like.bduffy wrote:Sigh...Is there any way to prevent Cubase threads from turning into every other Cubase thread?
-
- KVRAF
- 3158 posts since 2 Jul, 2005 from Stuck in the closet
At least they replied to you. I got no reply back. Bastards.bduffy wrote:Isn't the Yamaha DSPF card kind of outdated now? Wasn't it coded for Win98? Would that explain some of the problems trying to use it with SX 2/3?
Now to get back to the original question: I wrote Steinberg and - contrary to popular lore - got a near instant response! Here's what they said:And there you have it. Another casualty of protection. Too bad. They probably have me for life...but I've never owned a Yamaha DSPF...Steinberg wrote:Indeed we would love to have a freely available Cubase SX demo version but since Cubase SX is key protected we cannot offer one.
The is a demo for Cubase SX 3 that's shipped with every new VST instrument (e.g. The Grand 2, Hypersonic 2, Groove Agent 2, Virtual Bassist) but it requires the demo license code to be transferred to a Steinberg USB key. Offering Cubase SX 3 for download without the key protection would simply compromise the copy protection for the retail versions.
Mizutaphile.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Err???birrbits wrote:Logic is German, Cubase is DanishDyerMaker wrote:Btw. Cubase is great, but its way too German.
Since when?
Anyways, it really makes no sense not offering a demo if you want truly convinced customers.
I also doubt the tutorial CD mentioned contains an actual SX 3 demo (seems to be the older SX 1 demo that they took away as well).
I mean, their demos have allways been save-disabled, so, what would you actually gain through them? Oh, you could probably abuse their time stretching. That's about the only thing I could imagine. They could take it out then.
I don't think it's fear of piracy. I mean, usually hackers aren't able to implement a function that hasn't been there in the first place. So a non-saving version would just remain that, a non-saving version. Useless in the long run.
Regarding stability, I have to agree with what was said before, SX has gone a long way and it's fairly stable these days on quite a lot of systems.
If you have a proper soundcard that is, preferably an ASIO driven one.
Use MME drivers and you might still be out of luck. Unsynced audio recordings and the likes.
And well, if you are demoing a product, you may not have an ASIO card already...
Not sure whether Steinberg knows about those shortcomings and whether that knowledge might be related to the absence of a demo. On *could* suspect so.
But no matter how you put it, a product in that price range should have a demo.
Btw, it's the same with Logic, there's no demo either.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 6 Mar, 2001 from London, UK
Another possibility, of course, although I don't really think this could possibly be true
, is that a build freed of dependency upon the Syncrosoft dongle exhibits strikingly different performance from those builds that are dependent on it.
-
- Banned
- 1149 posts since 7 Mar, 2004
Cubase´s GUI responsible, or not, he´s american, still you rigth the damn thing as an european look to it, i´d say Italian designDyerMaker wrote:What does people mean when they say "Sonar is so American"? I have seen that comment a lot in different Cubase vs Sonar threads.
Btw. Cubase is great, but its way too German.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Italian design is known to be rather tasty...stag wrote:i´d say Italian design![]()
![]()
![]()
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 20 Mar, 2005 from Newcastle, UK
The demo version is SX 1.2 and there is no dongle.
The good thing about it, as regards the original post, is that it proves whether or not you can set it up on your system and also how you are able to adapt to the learning curve. I've tried many different demo's and find cubase to be one of the 'user-friendly' ones.
The good thing about it, as regards the original post, is that it proves whether or not you can set it up on your system and also how you are able to adapt to the learning curve. I've tried many different demo's and find cubase to be one of the 'user-friendly' ones.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
I hate to say it, but I'd loooove to see how Cubase handles without the dongle. Probably the same, but I'd love to know.HanafiH wrote:Another possibility, of course, although I don't really think this could possibly be true, is that a build freed of dependency upon the Syncrosoft dongle exhibits strikingly different performance from those builds that are dependent on it.
