fair enough...MadPsyance wrote:It's still still survival of the fittest in this industry. If everyone was making music like this, the best would still get the most respect and the rest will be considered amatuer or trash. Every generation it seems goes through this "dilema". Art is art. As long as there's enough room for artistic expression in a medium, true genius could emerge.Hink wrote:the way I see it that's precisely where technology is headed...I have no opinion either way..I can see the benefits for sure, and I would take full advantage of them....but you can't ignore the battle that rages on (one I'm sick of) of so called real musicians and those who just use a computer...(which for the record again, I believe the computer is an instrument) if such a device existed (and someday will) it will surely intensify that battle...I ask will the outcome be better or worse? A valid question, and one with enough varibles I wouldn't even attempt to take a guess...androidlove wrote:the answer is----whatever puts power in the hands of the people is goodHink wrote:androidlove wrote:wtf? making art and music is for everyone. power to the people!Hink wrote:what would the world be like if everyone who could hum a tune become a composer just by pushing a couple buttons?
I have no answer...but it poses a quite a lot of questions. What if they developed a tablet you write on. You select a mode, likely named for famous artists and styles. Then all you did was draw something close and it would turn out a flawless drawing based on you mode...would the be any artists at all if everyone was an artist? Would there be any musicians if everyone was a musician? Would it create elitism to the highest form? Or would there be none?
I'm sorry, did I draw a concluson?
edit....you might start by reading where I said I have no answer
I am high and feeling poetic, give me a break?
