BiFilter 1.5

[z_old_account]

why we cant get freq down to zero with this filter

One reason is usability:
BiFilter uses logarithmic frequency controls. Only a musically usefull range (in my eyes) should be possible.

The second reason is math:
Some filtertypes uses buffers for calculation. On a cutoff like 0Hz these buffers needed infinite size.

The third reason is continency:
All filters / effects should have the same sonic range. This makes them easier to compare.

If you think that 40Hz is not low enough, you could try other products.

Regards,
Markus

[martian]

thanks so much for this filter markus.

regards,

[kmonkey]

why we cant get freq down to zero with this filter

One reason is usability:
BiFilter uses logarithmic frequency controls. Only a musically usefull range (in my eyes) should be possible.

The second reason is math:
Some filtertypes uses buffers for calculation. On a cutoff like 0Hz these buffers needed infinite size.

The third reason is continency:
All filters / effects should have the same sonic range. This makes them easier to compare.

If you think that 40Hz is not low enough, you could try other products.

Regards,
Markus

No no. I like it very much

[R.A.W.]

markus, thanx again for this awesome filter!!!!

just used the new resampler fx on a bassdrum (no track to show off here, just playing around in eXT ).

[paradiddle]

Thanks a lot Markus. I wasn't expecting you to add more stuff to it. This is great.