Thanks. But if you say things like that, the piggies will think you dont love them any more.xoxos wrote: oh man... you are so good in bed.
experimental wing of kvr?
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35529 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 5017 posts since 13 Dec, 2005 from The Void
No shit!Spe3D wrote:You are posting in your box from your box in this box right herexoxos wrote:>
How can 'experimental' be even considered a genre in the first place?
by discretion, ie. creating a forum.. sorta delineates the concept of 'seperate things' real well when you make a place to talk bout them... but don't worry about considering that that's sorta implicit or nakedly obvious, keep pumping until you spurt. after all, "this box is yours, there are many like it, but..."
hey, you get what you want. a special place just for "you!" paid for with coin of the realm. and don't forget the tip on the way out.
Talk about invalidating one's own arguments..
Last edited by Sickle on Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jens, "B.t.w.: it appears I was wrong"
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
thats assuming that those involved DONT see experimental as a genre ...whyterabbyt wrote:Difficult to say, but I would generally expect a greater degree of maturity from those who are less concerned about following a specific genre and more interested in making their own genre-less way for their own reasons.
not buying that one ... cant think of one 'recognised' experimentalist at KVR who wouldnt know which other members to turn to for a considered opinion ... in some ways the 'non-experimental' artists are the outsiders here ...whyterabbyt wrote:Better to be individually isolated in order to continue that self-serving sense of being the 'enlightened outsider' ?
i did say it was IMHO ... but if not in relation to convention / accepted knowledge how DO you define what is experimental ???whyterabbyt wrote:I dont see why. I'm not convinced that 'experimentalism' can only be experienced as a reference point to 'convention'.
slainte
rob-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
yeah, you'd think i'd welcome my own drinking fountain ehSickle wrote: All this bullshit just to prevent another forum registration.
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35529 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Whoah, what a webel you must be, Wuwik.xoxos wrote:must be nice to have one of those to tell you where to go, eg. to your BOX and all....
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
oh that one was really spot on old chap!whyterabbyt wrote:Thanks. But if you say things like that, the piggies will think you dont love them any more.xoxos wrote: oh man... you are so good in bed.
capital!
i get it - THAT MEANS HE f**ks PIGS - f**king genius mate!
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
that dubya-are is relly funny!!! he saw that program i liked that was funny! LOLOLOLOLO..whyterabbyt wrote:
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
you can tell them because they're the ones that sit in the back.pHz wrote: how DO you define what is experimental ???
(repeat repeat repeat repeat... fellaheen forever..)
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- KVRAF
- 5017 posts since 13 Dec, 2005 from The Void
Jens, "B.t.w.: it appears I was wrong"
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35529 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Another 'if' ?pHz wrote:thats assuming that those involved DONT see experimental as a genre ...
In other words, the presence of a recognisable subset of similarly minded people does have benefits.whyterabbyt wrote:not buying that one ... cant think of one 'recognised' experimentalist at KVR who wouldnt know which other members to turn to for a considered opinion ...
Now, that I can agree, is a valid point.
Positing that it is 'better' for that group, in some unquantifiable way, because that group resides as a subset of a larger group, that I dont see as being quite as obvious.
But not in others.in some ways the 'non-experimental' artists are the outsiders here ...
From 'conventional forms and artists' to 'conventional knowledge'. Slight shift in context there, surely?whyterabbyt wrote:i did say it was IMHO ... but if not in relation to convention / accepted knowledge how DO you define what is experimental ???
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35529 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Really? I presumed it was just platonic.xoxos wrote: oh that one was really spot on old chap!
capital!
i get it - THAT MEANS HE f**ks PIGS - f**king genius mate!
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
"wait.. i'm looking like a fool out here.. i'd better stop making pig f**king remarks and start using words used ot describe technical processes more.."
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35529 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
You'll get used to it, kiddo.xoxos wrote:wait.. i'm looking like a fool out here..
It must be 'convoluted' then, cos it sure as f**k isnt 'logic'.i'd better stop making pig f**king remarks and start using words used ot describe technical processes more..
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 3928 posts since 23 Oct, 2005 from vassalboro, maine
you just made my girlfriends day...whyterabbyt wrote:Whoah, what a webel you must be, Wuwik.xoxos wrote:must be nice to have one of those to tell you where to go, eg. to your BOX and all....
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
yup ... where would experimentalism be without it ???whyterabbyt wrote:Another 'if' ?
it was never my point that it isnt helpful to have like-minded (or at least understanding) people around ...whyterabbyt wrote:In other words, the presence of a recognisable subset of similarly minded people does have benefits.
Now, that I can agree, is a valid point.
neither is positing that it is 'better' if that subset goes off and hides in its own little hole somewhere (i couldve used the word BOX i guess there) ...whyterabbyt wrote:Positing that it is 'better' for that group, in some unquantifiable way, because that group resides as a subset of a larger group, that I dont see as being quite as obvious.
granted ...whyterabbyt wrote:But not in others.in some ways the 'non-experimental' artists are the outsiders here ...
nah ... just a slight shift in use of language that only a few people would be bothered to pick up on and pretend it fundamentally (sorry ... slightly[/]) changed what i said ...whyterabbyt wrote:From 'conventional forms and artists' to 'conventional knowledge'. Slight shift in context there, surely?
slainte
rob