KVR Audio

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:02 am

bugs wrote:Without Cubase there wouldn't be any "logic" or "reason" in music not to mention any new-endos (virgins) or asios (we all know a few of these) or vstis or vstes. Cubase is to computer music what Jesus is to Christianity, what sex is to sexuality.

no, without cubase there would have been an other pioneer. Who knows, maybe named 'Hoolaboolabase' or 'MidiMasterPro' or 'AtariSafari'

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:07 am

this thread seems more heated than the Logic one..
maybe it's just the stupendous amount of warez users that heat things up too much

tuzemec · Post by **tuzemec** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:28 am

Hi...
I use Cubase SX with energyXT and I'm an alchoholic...

superddman · Post by **superddman** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:43 am

stag wrote:
Juanjo wrote:
Josmoker wrote:All the pros use Cubase, that's a fact. Plus Cubase sounds at least 10-20% better than all the other hosts - this has not only been proven by many highly scientific studies but i've come to the same result doing objective listening tests in my listening environment (which has been specifically optimized for host comparisons!).
Follow me, for I have seen the light!

I don´t think he´s joking, there are studies going even further... one i conducted reached the conclusion it sounds 33% to 37% better than most hosts... excluding logic, which sounds 67% worse than SX due to the lack of harmonic content of 0SX...

haha, I love it

Now, correct me if I am wrong, does samplitude sound 3% or 4% better then SX, for some reason can't remember.

stag · Post by **stag** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:10 am

Samplitude sounds 12,5% better than SX, that´s the exception to the rule, due to the colouring scheme of it´s awfull GUI... is that way for a reason.

Juanjo · Post by **Juanjo** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:11 am

superddman wrote: Now, correct me if I am wrong, does samplitude sound 3% or 4% better then SX, for some reason can't remember.

Yes, but only if you use centrinos and have a firewall installed.

camsr · Post by **camsr** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:14 am

stag wrote:Samplitude sounds 12,5% better than SX, that´s the exception to the rule, due to the colouring scheme of it´s awfull GUI... is that way for a reason.

The color's in the music

respirator · Post by **respirator** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:18 am

tuzemec wrote:Hi...
I use Cubase SX with energyXT and I'm an alchoholic...

We, the SX+XT crowd, should start a club or something. If only they'd fix the mpex-error and give us freezing of group tracks, and let freeze free Powercore ressources and ... na, it's about it.

hvaring · Post by **hvaring** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:20 am

One nice thing about Cubase is that it works with everything else. I use it with Reason (and sometimes Live) ReWired and energyXT as a VST(i). The best of all worlds. And freeze is my friend - at least until I can afford a new monster Dual Everything With All The Bells And Whistles DAW

SonicBreeze · Post by **SonicBreeze** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:53 am

cubase is father of all Hosts/Sequencer. All others are just inspirations from it or a cheap copy.

is there any third type?

Juanjo · Post by **Juanjo** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:09 am

SonicBreeze wrote:cubase is father of all Hosts/Sequencer. All others are just inspirations from it or a cheap copy.

is there any third type?

Hey, don't want to be a dick here, but c'mon... there are trackers, modular environments, simple vst hosts without sequencer, simple sequencers without vst support, hosts that focus on workflow (as opposed to bloatedness), etc etc etc There's a lot of different paradigms out there. It's OK if you like Cubase, though.

tuzemec · Post by **tuzemec** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:19 am

respirator wrote:
tuzemec wrote:Hi...
I use Cubase SX with energyXT and I'm an alchoholic...
We, the SX+XT crowd, should start a club or something. If only they'd fix the mpex-error and give us freezing of group tracks, and let freeze free Powercore ressources and ... na, it's about it.

Hm... I've never tryed to freeze my powercore tracks...

OMU · Post by **OMU** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:32 am

mystahr wrote:I never even upgraded from 5.1
what more does one need then?

hmmm... audio part editing in the arrange (fades, crossfades, level adjustement), freeze, much better automation, to name just a few.

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:33 am

OMU wrote:SX3 now is indeed a serious software.
It has the best freeze function I've seen.

You haven't seen many then, or?

Seriously, Samplitudes freeze has got to be the most comprehensive and intuitive like ever. I just wish everybody would copy the way it works.

Cheers!
bManic

stag · Post by **stag** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:15 pm

bmanic wrote:
OMU wrote:SX3 now is indeed a serious software.
It has the best freeze function I've seen.
You haven't seen many then, or?

Seriously, Samplitudes freeze has got to be the most comprehensive and intuitive like ever. I just wish everybody would copy the way it works.

Cheers!
bManic

No way b, SX is cooler than cool and has a bigger dongle than Samp.

God Bless Cubase