If I sample a drum machine can I legally provide SF2's?

Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Hi

I have sampled the drum hits from a Zoom drum machine. Can I legally provide these to others ?

cheers
al

Post

Don't know if it's legal but people seem to do it all the time. If you don't plan on selling it I don't think you would be exposing yourself to much liability.

Post

Cheers. I'll wait till I find out if it's 100% "kosha"
thanks
al

Post

Quite certainly, no.

Post

EDIT
Last edited by sonicfire on Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Post

Basically - if the machine itself is sample based, you can't. If it isn't, you can.

You can distribute your own samples, as long they are not samples of someone else's samples. Or something like that.
CubaseStudio4 µTonic/Rapture Nitro/GS-201/Ohmicide/TBK 1&3

Post

spacefox wrote:Basically - if the machine itself is sample based, you can't. If it isn't, you can.
We've had similar discussions on this forum more times that I care to remember.

There are countless sample CDs available of drum machines and synth presets. I have yet to hear of any lawsuits due to these products. For f**k's sake. If Roland sues you for sampling one of their sample based drum machines, what's to stop the manufacturer of the actual drums, that they sampled, to go after them? It's a potentially slippery slope here. My opinion is that it's probably illegal but I doubt that any of these companies would want to open up a potentially messy can of worms by pursuing a lawsuit.

If you're really worried about it, call an attorney up and pay him a few thousand dollars for his advice.

Post

well i assume the machine is sample based to be honest, though Im not sure 100%.

Post

You didn't answer. Are you gonna try and sell it or give it away for free? If you're giving it away, I wouldn't worry yourself about it.

Post

@John Vulich:

I agree that doing that will probably won't get you into any trouble, but the guy asked about the law - not about getting caught :)

About the manufacturer of drums suing Roland: what protected under copyright is the recording. This is the same protection recording preventing me from sampling any of your songs without premission. As accoustic drums aren't recording, they are not protected by the same law.

The situation is absurd just because the laws were passed in a world without samplers and samplists. Before plagiarism became an art form. This is why a recording is a recording, in the eyes of the law. Be it a whole song or a single drum hit.
CubaseStudio4 µTonic/Rapture Nitro/GS-201/Ohmicide/TBK 1&3

Post

Give it away (just sf2's of the kits from the box). But as the fella above said, I'm more interested in doing the right thing than finding out what I can get away with. But, I really appreciate your comments, thanks!

Post

aldoofbanga wrote:Give it away (just sf2's of the kits from the box). But as the fella above said, I'm more interested in doing the right thing than finding out what I can get away with. But, I really appreciate your comments, thanks!
Well, obeying the law and doing the right thing are not one and the same.
But that's an entirely different matter.
CubaseStudio4 µTonic/Rapture Nitro/GS-201/Ohmicide/TBK 1&3

Post

Usually I don't jump in these kinds of conversations, but here, this is straight from Edirol:
Edirol Hyper Canvas License Agreement wrote:...You shall not loan, rent, lease, sublicense or transfer the software, whole or in part, to any third party.
So I think we can safely assume they don't want you sampling and then redistributing their stuff, as the sounds themselves are a part of the software. I'd just avoid doing it at all, eventhough lots of people do it already.

Oh, and yeah, I know this guy isn't asking about Edirol specifically, but I think this can be applied to any sample-based piece of software or hardware.
Mizutaphile.

Post

aldoofbanga wrote:Hi

I have sampled the drum hits from a Zoom drum machine. Can I legally provide these to others ?

cheers
al
My guess is you should write to the manufacturer - that way you will know for sure.

In short though - if its sample based, it is most probably illegal to sample it and distribute it - unless you have it in writing from the manufacturer saying that you can sample and distribute it.

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

Post

Ildon wrote:Usually I don't jump in these kinds of conversations, but here, this is straight from Edirol:
Edirol Hyper Canvas License Agreement wrote:...You shall not loan, rent, lease, sublicense or transfer the software, whole or in part, to any third party.
So I think we can safely assume they don't want you sampling and then redistributing their stuff, as the sounds themselves are a part of the software. I'd just avoid doing it at all, eventhough lots of people do it already.
Well, then I guess that the legal departments of companies like Roland better get on the ball and start filing lawsuits against companies like Big Fish Audio...

http://www.bigfishaudio.com

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Maybe they licensed the sounds. I don't know. There certainly isn't any mention of licensing on their site. I would imagine that they had to at least license, or clear, usage of the logos.

Post Reply

Return to “Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries”