Well done. I'm afraid, as is always the case when confronting Christianity, that I am dealing with people who know the thing inside and out - including the confusing ways it justifies glaring contradictions - and alas, I'm at a disadvantage without more research materials available to me. I would need a lot more explanation than that to reconcile it too: abolish which ones? all of them? only the nasty ones?rockstar_not wrote:I promised I would stay out of this one - but here goes.....bduffy wrote:Deuteronomy 17
17:2 If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant; 17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded; 17:4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel; 17:5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.
The quote above is from the Old Testament, 'the Law'. Jesus came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it. Here's the quote from Matthew 5:17, Jesus words, not mine:
The Old Testament was about how to get to heaven by following a quite complicated set of laws, some of which are admittedly pretty extreme - like the one you've shown above.Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
By fulfilling those laws, Jesus removed quite a bit of the obligation to following those laws and certainly set an example against many of them - for which the religious establishment were constantly on his case for; whether it was healing somebody on the Sabbath (supposedly 'doing work' and not keeping it holy) or his disciples not ceremoniously washing their hands before eating, or eating at the home of a tax collector, etc.
It's been said that the etymology of the word 'Christian' can mean a few things: 1. Imitator of Christ, or 2. 'Little' Christ, or 3. Follower of Christ.
There is no written record of Christ stoning anyone - in fact he saved at least one woman from suffering that death.
The point is, that if you are going to make claims about what Christians are supposed to do and not do, at least get the facts straight. Christians are not supposed to kill non-Christians.
-Scott
You're right, though, perhaps I'm ill equipped to be jumping in without my research material, especially if I'm going to get quotes wrong. I apologize for that. I have further evidence, but not being at home, I have to rely on web sources, which can't be fully trusted.

