If it does sell for £499, it will probably be in the $900 neighborhood.Jeremy_NSL wrote:Looks really cool. Awaiting the cost in US $.
Add some DSP horsepower! Watch out, TC & UAD, look at this!
-
- KVRist
- 47 posts since 21 Nov, 2002 from P Double, Fl
D@mnWithout wrote:If it does sell for £499, it will probably be in the $900 neighborhood.Jeremy_NSL wrote:Looks really cool. Awaiting the cost in US $.
I still think it's worth to check out.
- KVRAF
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Well, as a Sintefex FX 8000 owner I'm devastated!
I really do wonder how they can pull off 32 channels as this box does only 6 and has way over 30 SHARC DSP processors (not the budget ones either) inside it and gets quite hot. My guess is that they have shortened each impulses sample length to something like 256 or 512. The sintefex uses 2048 samples long impulses. However, this unit is exactly what I thought would pop up sooner or later and will force the original unit prices to drop like crazy. Anybody found more links about this thing?
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRAF
- 1868 posts since 26 Oct, 2002 from San Francisco
It's not a price difference, it's a currency conversion.Since1980 wrote:D@mnWithout wrote:If it does sell for £499, it will probably be in the $900 neighborhood.Jeremy_NSL wrote:Looks really cool. Awaiting the cost in US $.![]()
![]()
, why such a huge price difference...
I still think it's worth to check out.
Right now, 499 GBP = 869.87 USD
-
- KVRAF
- 2172 posts since 14 Feb, 2003
Yeah they probably lopped the IR, but also, that sintefex is how old now? I'm sure DSP chip speed has ramped up a bit since it was released.bmanic wrote:Well, as a Sintefex FX 8000 owner I'm devastated!I really do wonder how they can pull off 32 channels as this box does only 6 and has way over 30 SHARC DSP processors (not the budget ones either) inside it and gets quite hot. My guess is that they have shortened each impulses sample length to something like 256 or 512. The sintefex uses 2048 samples long impulses. However, this unit is exactly what I thought would pop up sooner or later and will force the original unit prices to drop like crazy. Anybody found more links about this thing?
Cheers!
bManic
Also, they don't have to include any ad/da electronics, further knocking change off the backedn of the manufacturing cost.
But anyhow, I'm content with my current tools, my dollars go to promotion nowadays.
-
- KVRist
- 47 posts since 21 Nov, 2002 from P Double, Fl
Your right, for some stupid reason I confusing the "£" as Euro instead of pounds.jackson wrote: It's not a price difference, it's a currency conversion.
Right now, 499 GBP = 869.87 USD
-
- KVRAF
- 2344 posts since 8 Jul, 2002 from Limerick, Ireland
Sheeeet... even in Euros I gotta say this looks VERY interesting...
Also I would imagine something along the lines of everything else FW with regards to power - perhaps there is a wall wart if you cant buss power it - it would be silly not to have that option.
This is Uber-New to me - I wasnt looking for something like this but it SURE has sparked my interest!!!
I wonder if there are plans to develop further fx for it... how many could be jumbled together (in theory)...
VERY INTERESTING!!!
Dave
Also I would imagine something along the lines of everything else FW with regards to power - perhaps there is a wall wart if you cant buss power it - it would be silly not to have that option.
This is Uber-New to me - I wasnt looking for something like this but it SURE has sparked my interest!!!
I wonder if there are plans to develop further fx for it... how many could be jumbled together (in theory)...
VERY INTERESTING!!!
Dave
-
- KVRAF
- 2565 posts since 30 Mar, 2004 from Phoenix AZ USA
Convulsion? + Fire Wire? =
Latency? for real time monitoring?
Hate the price.
OK so it's like a UAD but only does a "channel strip" thing.
Sorry I am not impressed, I will stick to the UAD.
If any manufacturer wants to break the bank they should build a box that can run native plugs.
Latency? for real time monitoring?
Hate the price.
OK so it's like a UAD but only does a "channel strip" thing.
Sorry I am not impressed, I will stick to the UAD.
If any manufacturer wants to break the bank they should build a box that can run native plugs.
-
- KVRist
- 47 posts since 21 Nov, 2002 from P Double, Fl
Yeah but 32channels of compressors and eq's is quite impressive to me. If and I mean "IF" it sounds good, it's a must buy. Since there isn't a AD/DA or preamp attached to it, I wonder how much focusrite tweak the formula, cause as far as I know the Liquid Channel wasn't all that it was advertised to be...AndrewSimon wrote:Convulsion? + Fire Wire? =
Latency? for real time monitoring?
Hate the price.
OK so it's like a UAD but only does a "channel strip" thing.
Sorry I am not impressed, I will stick to the UAD.
If any manufacturer wants to break the bank they should build a box that can run native plugs.
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
-
- KVRAF
- 4229 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Right here, in front of my computer...
*But* those compressors and EQ's just might be stuff like Neves, Pultecs, 1176's, LA2A's, and knowing Syntefex they may well be very good indeed.AndrewSimon wrote:OK so it's like a UAD but only does a "channel strip" thing.
Sorry I am not impressed, I will stick to the UAD.
Say for example the compressor can do an 1176 or LA2A as good as a UAD card (I doubt it, but let's just say it could) - 32 channels of that alone, plus a good EQ is not to be sneezed at, methinks...
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 4229 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Right here, in front of my computer...
That 32 channels might also translate 16 stereo channels. I've easily used that amount on small projects. Heck, I've had some projects that have had 80+tracks of vocals. Just because you don't need it doesn't mean others don't either...
Heck you could use a good few stereo channels on a drum kit alone...
Heck you could use a good few stereo channels on a drum kit alone...
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
And you put a compressor on every voice did you?beej wrote:That 32 channels might also translate 16 stereo channels. I've easily used that amount on small projects. Heck, I've had some projects that have had 80+tracks of vocals. Just because you don't need it doesn't mean others don't either...



