Should i buy the Waves SSL 4000?
-
- KVRist
- 56 posts since 24 Jun, 2004
is there anything out there that can give me the bang for the buck?
I used to use the C1 for compression quite heavily and i thought it sounded ridiculously amazing. Since then ive sold all my plugins, moved to an apple computer, and now im contemplating on getting either the Waves Native PowerPack for $300, or the SSL 4000.
Compression is a MUST. Would the compressor on the 4000 be superior to the C1? I've taken a look at both plugins, and it seems the C1 has more functions and knobs, whereas the 4000 has only a basic attack/thresh/release/ratio.
How does C1 and the 4000 compare in terms of sound quality?
thanks!!
I used to use the C1 for compression quite heavily and i thought it sounded ridiculously amazing. Since then ive sold all my plugins, moved to an apple computer, and now im contemplating on getting either the Waves Native PowerPack for $300, or the SSL 4000.
Compression is a MUST. Would the compressor on the 4000 be superior to the C1? I've taken a look at both plugins, and it seems the C1 has more functions and knobs, whereas the 4000 has only a basic attack/thresh/release/ratio.
How does C1 and the 4000 compare in terms of sound quality?
thanks!!
-
- KVRAF
- 4229 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Right here, in front of my computer...
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
If you're used to the flexibility of the C1, you might want to make sure you try out the SSL compressor first. It seems more limited, but then again, might have that "magic" that just works for your tracks.
Of course, you get more things with the NPP, so it's a far better choice for day-to-day processing. BUT - it's getting a little old; I'd be tempted to save a couple bucks and get the Waves Musicians Bundle II, unless you're really sweet on the C1.
Of course, you get more things with the NPP, so it's a far better choice for day-to-day processing. BUT - it's getting a little old; I'd be tempted to save a couple bucks and get the Waves Musicians Bundle II, unless you're really sweet on the C1.
-
- KVRian
- 1219 posts since 12 Aug, 2002
You will want that C1 back.tekara wrote:How does C1 and the 4000 compare in terms of sound quality?
Not to knock the SSL bus comp...but you can accomplish *much* more with the C1 in terms of creative dynamics shaping and control. A truly great and versatile tool.
To the mind that is still, the whole universe surrenders - Lao Tzu
-
- KVRAF
- 4229 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Right here, in front of my computer...
Yes. I don't think that the UAD-1 offers everything. It is a 'character' compressor in the main, mean it has a tendency toward big, fat, raunchy, aggressive and in your face (obviously depending on how severely you use/abuse it).
The C1 is about the cleanest, blandest, least characterful compressor you can get (in my experience anyway) - not that it's not useful, it's great tool. However, 'bland' compression is very easy to do in the native world. It's the complexities and sound of the UAD stuff that just sounds expensive, and it instantly starts making your stuff sound like a record.
For people doing dance music, I don't recommend the UAD as much, as it may have too much character for that. For acoustic, rock and pop music though, it's a superb tool.
Don't forget also that the UAD channel strip plug has a compressor that's also pretty good, and not as complex sounding as the big comps.
Basically, the C1 is clean. The SSL stuff supposedly has a distinctive character, and the two are really different tools for different purposes.
But the UAD still rocks my world
The C1 is about the cleanest, blandest, least characterful compressor you can get (in my experience anyway) - not that it's not useful, it's great tool. However, 'bland' compression is very easy to do in the native world. It's the complexities and sound of the UAD stuff that just sounds expensive, and it instantly starts making your stuff sound like a record.
For people doing dance music, I don't recommend the UAD as much, as it may have too much character for that. For acoustic, rock and pop music though, it's a superb tool.
Don't forget also that the UAD channel strip plug has a compressor that's also pretty good, and not as complex sounding as the big comps.
Basically, the C1 is clean. The SSL stuff supposedly has a distinctive character, and the two are really different tools for different purposes.
But the UAD still rocks my world
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 56 posts since 24 Jun, 2004
ahhhhh!!
damn you guys have made me even more torn about this decision
Thanks for the input anyways though, glad to hear the pros/cons of everything.
Now that we're on the topic of TC powercore stuff, would the firewire powercore be a good match to the UAD-1?
I keep hearing people raving mad about the UAD-1. Especially the guys at the music store, who consistently claim that the UAD-1 is superior to the powercore. The only reason why im leaning a bit more towards the powercore is that they have 3rd party plugin instruments, and not only effects. Is UAD-1 planning on releasing instruments as well in the near future? I also have something against PCI cards as opposed to breakout firewire boxes. Theres something about opening up a computer and sticking it inside and never seeing it bothers me, as opposed to seeing a rack unit on the shelf. Maybe im just shallow! =/
I will definately take your advice into consideration. These tools will be strictly for DANCE music.
damn you guys have made me even more torn about this decision
Thanks for the input anyways though, glad to hear the pros/cons of everything.
Now that we're on the topic of TC powercore stuff, would the firewire powercore be a good match to the UAD-1?
I keep hearing people raving mad about the UAD-1. Especially the guys at the music store, who consistently claim that the UAD-1 is superior to the powercore. The only reason why im leaning a bit more towards the powercore is that they have 3rd party plugin instruments, and not only effects. Is UAD-1 planning on releasing instruments as well in the near future? I also have something against PCI cards as opposed to breakout firewire boxes. Theres something about opening up a computer and sticking it inside and never seeing it bothers me, as opposed to seeing a rack unit on the shelf. Maybe im just shallow! =/
I will definately take your advice into consideration. These tools will be strictly for DANCE music.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 56 posts since 24 Jun, 2004
sorry my bad, i shouldnt of asked that uad-1 vs powercore question so quickly without checking the forums.
i just did a search, and it seems like an overwhelming decision to UAD-1 over the powercore.
But im still baffled when you everyone seems to say to not go for the UAD-1 when it comes to dance music. Why is that?
Will it actually make it sound bad? Or do you guys mean it it just wont sound as good than if a TC powercore was used?
I actually find dance music to be quite boring when it sounds too clean.....
i just did a search, and it seems like an overwhelming decision to UAD-1 over the powercore.
But im still baffled when you everyone seems to say to not go for the UAD-1 when it comes to dance music. Why is that?
Will it actually make it sound bad? Or do you guys mean it it just wont sound as good than if a TC powercore was used?
I actually find dance music to be quite boring when it sounds too clean.....
-
- KVRist
- 47 posts since 3 Oct, 2004
Have you guys checked out Neodynium?
http://www.elementalaudiosystems.com/pr ... index.html
Personally I think its an amazing compression tool! But, its very clean.
http://www.elementalaudiosystems.com/pr ... index.html
Personally I think its an amazing compression tool! But, its very clean.
-
- KVRist
- 167 posts since 2 Apr, 2004
Waves ssl bundle sounds absolutely fantastic, If you want to read some in depth debate and see the reults of a blind listening test drop in to the gearslutz forum
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
What? That's a bizzare statement; most dance producers use and crave vintage compressors, EQ's and mixers like the rest of us. I can't imagine anyone suffering from owning a UAD-1!EJoIf wrote: you're going to make dance music, do NOT get an UAD-1. Yes it will make it sound bad.
Last edited by bduffy on Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2336 posts since 13 Oct, 2002 from Terra Firma
I'm not sure why anyone would not recommend a UAD-1 for dance music. It's like saying, "Don't use a vintage synth for dance music." How bizarre!
It is quite disconcerting how these myths are spread under the guise of 'pro' advice.
The UAD-1 plugs sound great with dance music as do the Poco plugs. I suppose the Poco has the edge as far as 3rd party but Sony are really the main players here.
Either the UAD-1 and Poco 2 work with most PC's but I wouldn't get the Poco FW as some have experienced problems with it. Having said that, the latest Poco 2 driver has been a bit buggy.
This looks interesting for the UAD-1
Neve plugins
It is quite disconcerting how these myths are spread under the guise of 'pro' advice.
The UAD-1 plugs sound great with dance music as do the Poco plugs. I suppose the Poco has the edge as far as 3rd party but Sony are really the main players here.
Either the UAD-1 and Poco 2 work with most PC's but I wouldn't get the Poco FW as some have experienced problems with it. Having said that, the latest Poco 2 driver has been a bit buggy.
This looks interesting for the UAD-1
Neve plugins

