Limiter Shootout
- KVRAF
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
I've ran this little snippet of music (pop/latin/beat kind of thing) trough 4 different limiters. The first clips are limited lightly, about 3dB gain reduction and then I hit the limiters more brutally at about 6dB gain reduction each. Please vote in the poll for your favourite limiter on this particular clip. Note that all limiters here are quality code but are obviously suitable for different kinds of music. Just because one might fare worse here doesn't mean that it's a bad limiter. This material is quite transient driven and has nearly no distortion in it which might make some limiters struggle a bit.
This is a blind test and I will reveal the results when I have enough poll answers. However, for reference I'll give you these:
Original clip and RME HDSP 9632 brutally clipped on input about +3dB
EDIT: Just for everybodys information, I have matched the volume of each clip to the original for fair competition. However, this is done by ear so they might not be perfectly matched but should be good enough for a comparison.
Here are the lightly limited (about 3dB) clips:
Limiter A
Limiter B
Limiter C
Limiter D
Here are the heavily limited (about 6db) clips:
Limiter A
Limiter B
Limiter C
Limiter D
Have fun!
bManic
This is a blind test and I will reveal the results when I have enough poll answers. However, for reference I'll give you these:
Original clip and RME HDSP 9632 brutally clipped on input about +3dB
EDIT: Just for everybodys information, I have matched the volume of each clip to the original for fair competition. However, this is done by ear so they might not be perfectly matched but should be good enough for a comparison.
Here are the lightly limited (about 3dB) clips:
Limiter A
Limiter B
Limiter C
Limiter D
Here are the heavily limited (about 6db) clips:
Limiter A
Limiter B
Limiter C
Limiter D
Have fun!
bManic
Last edited by bmanic on Sat May 06, 2006 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Of course you do. It is less squashed but that's not the point. Which of the limiters do you feel does the least amount of damage to this clip? Now be a good lad and vote in the poll. 
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
Well may I? On the clips you got there I find A and B to be the best. C and D are distorting and the bass sound thin and not as calm as A and B. I find B to be the best in your example.
Torben
Torben
-
- KVRian
- 690 posts since 31 May, 2002 from chez moi
I think I'm a lousy judge, but I mostly agree with Torben. I thought C&D had a muddy low end on the light clips, and they distorted on the heavy clips. I think B maybe had better dynamics while A was the most neutral?
s.
s.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Thanks for the comments.. keep em coming. Please vote in the poll too, or is it simply not working for me? 
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRian
- 1243 posts since 24 Oct, 2003 from Maine
A wins IMO, that's just from judging which sounds best to me atm and not looking too deeply for any distiortion.
B seems to do something to the stereo image, it seems reduced somehow. Perhaps it has to do with crushing the transients of the snaps which are well panned.
B seems to do something to the stereo image, it seems reduced somehow. Perhaps it has to do with crushing the transients of the snaps which are well panned.
♫♪♫♫♪♫
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
clipped version sounded the worst of them all. Transients had been destroyed, didn't seem to work at all on this material.
My clear favourite was C on both 3-6 db limiting. It somehow seemed to compress the material due to the lively release shape. It seemed to enhance/pump the original in a good subtle way.
A came out second, with possibly most transparent limiting, althought the transients had already been mushed a bit as there was some "slashing" going on the snare, in need of a better word.
B seemed to have bad pumping going on, killing the transient movement, although it was very non-destructive while doing it. The pumping sucked out some good movement.
D was clearly the worst on both, as it seemed to have subtle high end loss and mushing of transients.
..nevermind me, just winetasting here.
My clear favourite was C on both 3-6 db limiting. It somehow seemed to compress the material due to the lively release shape. It seemed to enhance/pump the original in a good subtle way.
A came out second, with possibly most transparent limiting, althought the transients had already been mushed a bit as there was some "slashing" going on the snare, in need of a better word.
B seemed to have bad pumping going on, killing the transient movement, although it was very non-destructive while doing it. The pumping sucked out some good movement.
D was clearly the worst on both, as it seemed to have subtle high end loss and mushing of transients.
..nevermind me, just winetasting here.
-
- KVRAF
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
And how many votes is enough ?bmanic wrote: This is a blind test and I will reveal the results when I have enough poll answers.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
No, it isn't my material. A friend of mine has been putting this little tune together and I have no idea of what he used (most likely some of the UAD plugins). The high eq could very well be the Precision EQ.3*s wrote:Did you produce that btw? The high EQ sounds nice, I'd love to know what was used.
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
I have no idea.. I actually completely forgot to check the settings for the poll. It's at the default value which is .. ? Forever?Mutant wrote: And how many votes is enough ?
Lets let it run for at least 24 hours ok?
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRAF
- 4030 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
'A' is so farty... It makes kicks explode.
'B' is compressing transients a bit more than I want, but is good. 'D' is good, but a bit aggressive (that's not bad, but not what I like and it seems to sound a bit more muddy, and changes original sound which is rounder). Both in 'A' and 'D' snare is a bit too snappy and prolonged (sounds like a shaved top) - original clip's snare slaps as well, but it slaps due to higher dynamic range - not because it is prolonged.
I like 'C' the most
In some places 'B' sounds better, but not better overall.
(this was based on 'heavy' clips alone).
I like 'C' the most
(this was based on 'heavy' clips alone).
