inbeLievble! steinberg cubas sx4 !

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

hallo, no long see :)
here I find evry interesting from new coming sx4:

Image

Image

Image

check here:
http://www.nuskoolbreaks.co.uk/viewtopi ... 243#668243

that look cool, but I not believe this real!

bye

Post

Was Steinberg bought out by the BABYA software group?
Image

Post

A send-up.
Image

Post

not very impressive. nice on the VST 3 standard tho.
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

Jason Brian Merrill wrote:not very impressive. nice on the VST 3 standard tho.
not very impressive?
I think too much impressive..
-> must be fake info!

bye

Post

40 bug fixes! Only 3000 more to go...

Post

jackson wrote:40 bug fixes! Only 3000 more to go...
:lol: theyve made it easier to side chain....
i hope this isnt fake :shock:
Last edited by tangentmusic on Mon May 15, 2006 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tangent's tracks on myspace

"I wish there were a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. There's a knob called "brightness, but that doesn't work." - Author Unknown

Post

I wonder how much their dsp accellerators will be (Assuming they are real). I could really use a few of those as I'm always maxing out my cpu very early into the recording process.
Excuse all the blood.

Post

Don't care about SX4 much, but the VST3 info sure looks yummy. Esp. the computer/DSP dynamic load balancing - finally a solution that would allow using DSP cards to run cheap/freeware plugs! The plugs would have to get ported to VST3, ofcourse, but maybe a wrapper could be done for that? Should be possible if the upcoming Yamaha DSP is x86 compatible (and it doesn't seem very unlikely - after all the plugs are supposed to be runnable on the PC OR the DSP card).
the the impotence of proofreading

Post

They could well be different code in the dll (as there will still need to be some shell that communicates between the DSP and the host): if there's DSP capacity, the DSP code is popped over to the card, if not, the x86 code is loaded and run on the CPU(s).

Post


Post

Upon re-reading I have to say it's got to be fake. That's just too much huge stuff and there's no way that all of it could be done in one upgrade.

If it turns out to be true then I'll be overjoyed, but I'll also be incredibly surprised.
Excuse all the blood.

Post

se non è vero, è ben trovato... :o
.:darl_chenu:.

Post

a mod who "checked with HQ" says:
"until the real facts are known, speculation inevitablly will lead to some disappointment allthough I am sure SX4 will be worth waiting for."

Looks like Donnie Darko Brasco guessed right:
Donnie Darko Brasco wrote:not very impressive?
I think too much impressive..
-> must be fake info!
:hink: er, :shrug:

Post

Sounds very good to me. If it is a fake, as Tank over at the Cubase Forum suggests, then some people will probably be dissappointed when the real specs come out.

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”