"To carry on in quiet desperation is the English way."M4M wrote:"desperation is the english way"-watersbduffy wrote:This thread makes me feel the English way.
This ain't quiet.
inbeLievble! steinberg cubas sx4 !
-
- KVRAF
- 4265 posts since 21 Oct, 2001 from my bolthole in the south pacific
This ain't quiet.
-
Muzik 4 Machines Muzik 4 Machines https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=9550 - KVRAF
- 7829 posts since 6 Oct, 2003 from Quebec
sorry_,quoteD_out_of_contextegbert wrote:"To carry on in quiet desperation is the English way."M4M wrote:"desperation is the english way"-watersbduffy wrote:This thread makes me feel the English way.
This ain't quiet.
-
- KVRer
- 27 posts since 19 Dec, 2003
Okay people, two points.
-the document is badly written(yes), contains errors and confused ideas(yes). And you say that identifies it as bogus? Fact is, that's what tips me off that it's real. In my view, the papers have just the right mix of wishful PR and cloudy tech details, the kind of thing that PR and ad-people love to get into without complete knowledge of what they're writing. I'm with uvacom on this one. If it didn't have ugly bits I would be suspicious.
-It's a confirmed hoax because the perpetrator confessed? HELLO, this is the internet we're talking about! My nose tells me the writer of the "confession" is a tool of Steinberg. What better way to resolve the uncertainty then to reveal the "source" of the "hoax"? It worked on Kingston, and probably a lot of others.
I find it hilarious that this anonymous document appeared, and was derided by certain people. But those same people are perfectly happy to accept an anonymous confession on Steinberg's own forums(!) as proof of their correctitude! Talk about believing what you want to be true.
over and out! dh
-the document is badly written(yes), contains errors and confused ideas(yes). And you say that identifies it as bogus? Fact is, that's what tips me off that it's real. In my view, the papers have just the right mix of wishful PR and cloudy tech details, the kind of thing that PR and ad-people love to get into without complete knowledge of what they're writing. I'm with uvacom on this one. If it didn't have ugly bits I would be suspicious.
-It's a confirmed hoax because the perpetrator confessed? HELLO, this is the internet we're talking about! My nose tells me the writer of the "confession" is a tool of Steinberg. What better way to resolve the uncertainty then to reveal the "source" of the "hoax"? It worked on Kingston, and probably a lot of others.
I find it hilarious that this anonymous document appeared, and was derided by certain people. But those same people are perfectly happy to accept an anonymous confession on Steinberg's own forums(!) as proof of their correctitude! Talk about believing what you want to be true.
over and out! dh
-
- KVRist
- 204 posts since 7 Jun, 2001
Killvehicle wrote:hahah Oh man I cant believe this is back up, DO you all realize you are saying "I knew it was fake before you did!"
erm, actually, no thats not what im saying
i just read that thing for the first time and this was my initial reaction to it, cause i thought the "plugin demo versions in project" was very funny. sorry if i dont read the forum all day... 
since you seem to be the expert here about how many times which topic has been posted where on this forum, maybe it would be a good idea to drop the "you must have something better to do than this" attitudeKillvehicle wrote: Come on , YOu all must have something better to do than this, There is another completely worthless thread that hasnt been drubbed to death out here.
-
- KVRist
- 256 posts since 1 Jun, 2003 from USA
man get a grip the guy created it and posted it to get Stienberg's attention , he wants to work for them.
It's posted all over the net.
It's posted all over the net.
In the midst of life
what shall I compare it to
Daybreak, emptiness left behind a rowing boat.
"Sami Mansei"
what shall I compare it to
Daybreak, emptiness left behind a rowing boat.
"Sami Mansei"
-
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
people just can't be helped when they want a conspiracy, eh?DirtyHarry wrote:interweb idiocy goes on and on and on and on...
carry on then. It'll be fun when you all start to cry when most of those features won't show up.
(I say that for a fact, since an actual Borg beta tester friend of mine told me, not some fabricated erroneous document. And no, you don't have to believe me either. and by the way, the real important improvements of "SX4" weren't even mentioned in that hoax.)
On a smaller scale this reminds me of the plot hoaxes that surfaced on the net during the making of matrix 2 and 3. Although in all those cases they were crackpot theories, and mostly just funny in a sad way.
-
- KVRAF
- 2609 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
jesus your paranoidDirtyHarry wrote:Okay people, two points.
-the document is badly written(yes), contains errors and confused ideas(yes). And you say that identifies it as bogus? Fact is, that's what tips me off that it's real. In my view, the papers have just the right mix of wishful PR and cloudy tech details, the kind of thing that PR and ad-people love to get into without complete knowledge of what they're writing. I'm with uvacom on this one. If it didn't have ugly bits I would be suspicious.
-It's a confirmed hoax because the perpetrator confessed? HELLO, this is the internet we're talking about! My nose tells me the writer of the "confession" is a tool of Steinberg. What better way to resolve the uncertainty then to reveal the "source" of the "hoax"? It worked on Kingston, and probably a lot of others.
I find it hilarious that this anonymous document appeared, and was derided by certain people. But those same people are perfectly happy to accept an anonymous confession on Steinberg's own forums(!) as proof of their correctitude! Talk about believing what you want to be true.
over and out! dh
you about a steinberg employee saying on the official forum its a fake
mind you he already is one of the borg - so he is lieing too ?
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
DirtyHarry wrote:HELLO, this is the internet we're talking about!
