KVR Audio

Z3R0T0N1N · Post by **Z3R0T0N1N** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:11 pm

http://www.jesusonic.com/index.php

you can download a pc version that includes a DX plugin. works well here. nice FX that can be chained any way you like, and uses no cpu that i can measure.

PLUS, you can use the code editor to write your own FX algorithms.

here is a quick sample of a CR78 beat run though a sweeping lopass, tube distortion, and phaser (all jesusonic internal fx):

http://www.spoonboiler.com/jesusonic.wav

btw: it's not a religious thing at all, so let's not spoil this with a bunch of arguing. there is a fair amount of 'tongue in cheek-ness' going on with the name. eg: CrucFX hardware unit, you have to see it

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:27 pm

I tried this a while ago, but didn't find it did anything exceptionally different to make me want to use the mostly text interface.

Maybe I'll give it another go tonight.

jPod · Post by **jPod** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:59 pm

The Jesusonic effects are also used in Reaper, which lets you use GUI controls to edit the parameters.

How can you not like a progam that installs "jesus.dll"?

Z3R0T0N1N · Post by **Z3R0T0N1N** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:01 pm

Z3R0T0N1N · Post by **Z3R0T0N1N** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:05 pm

shamann wrote:I tried this a while ago, but didn't find it did anything exceptionally different to make me want to use the mostly text interface.

Maybe I'll give it another go tonight.

yeah, i was kind of ho-hum when i first loaded it up a few months ago, but that was before i noticed it in my DX list. It's actually really easy to use. there isn't any typing to speak of, just cliking A to add an effect, arrow keys and enter to choose which one, and arrow keys to set the parameters. i found it nice and quick and really like the low cpu.

heheh

maybe it's down to the name. I just kind of like the name jesusonic. it makes me smile

but it does sound quite good to my ears. i am always looking for a 'better' distortion unit, and this one sounds nice to me.

Newbie Brad · Post by **Newbie Brad** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:32 pm

I recently had an epiphany about how to get it to work and now I like it quite well in fact. Though I hope Justin will agree to code a live performance oriented template into Reaper and then all troubles will cease.

sboullion · Post by **sboullion** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:04 am

I'm not crazy about the name, but I like Jesusonic. I don't mind the interface.

Some of the effects are a little lackluster, but some are actually not bad. And it's cpu performance is quite stunning.

They are the included plugin set with REAPER.

matthewjumps · Post by **matthewjumps** » Fri May 26, 2006 4:15 am

I love the archaic interface - reminds me of my tracking days....

also love how the effects can be re-written inside it - thats really cool.

wish i knew how to write them tho...

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Fri May 26, 2006 4:35 am

Crap fx, semifunny name.

matthewjumps · Post by **matthewjumps** » Fri May 26, 2006 4:38 am

the nice thing about it is if you think the fx stink - you can write your own...

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Fri May 26, 2006 4:52 am

With all the good VST freebies around, I don't have to.

P.T. · Post by **P.T.** » Fri May 26, 2006 6:15 am

I know this is a bit off topic, but I installed Reaper on my win98 machine and I can't get it to play. It stutters terribly with even just one wave file.

Is anyone using it with win 98?

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Fri May 26, 2006 7:10 am

"CrusFX"

!!!!!!!!!!

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Fri May 26, 2006 4:19 pm

youre all going to hell!!

matthewjumps · Post by **matthewjumps** » Sat May 27, 2006 12:03 am

jesusonic? :D