What host for Groove Quantize and Advanced Piano Roll?
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
two in a row...reckon I'm not alone because I do that all the time...or were you just trying to get me to post the pic? 
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
Honestly, for the Qbase groove quantize functions...I love them. I tend to use custom templates though, that I've created either in my free time (which means they're old, as I don't have much of that anymore.bduffy wrote:Cubasee?TotcProductions wrote:Cuuuuuuubbbbaaaasssseeeee
Do you use Groove Quantize much? I have to admit that I've never gotten much out of my experiments with it, but I know people swear by it (and it's good to humanize your stuff), but I could never get the quantize of a loop to just magically "fit" my music. I seem to recall the old Cubase was a real vanguard in this domain.
That ACID thing looks real interesting, I must say!
Rednroll, this is how you do it:
Easist thing: paste your picture URL in, highlight it, then hit the "URL" button up top; it'll magically wrap it!Code: Select all
[url]http://www.gluemeat.com/images/nicefnjobcanada.gif[/url]
Peace
-
- jaaathmaster
- 2690 posts since 1 Jun, 2001 from Marlow, S. Bucks, UK
Use it all the time here - when I quantize stuff, I still want to retain the swing that I originally intended it to have - therefore the 'grid' I want to quantize to is not perfectly regular. It's not about humanizing, it's about improving timing. If everything else is swinging, a row of uniform 16ths is going to sound completely wrong.bduffy wrote:Cubasee?TotcProductions wrote:Cuuuuuuubbbbaaaasssseeeee
Do you use Groove Quantize much? I have to admit that I've never gotten much out of my experiments with it, but I know people swear by it (and it's good to humanize your stuff), but I could never get the quantize of a loop to just magically "fit" my music. I seem to recall the old Cubase was a real vanguard in this domain.
I tend to use iterative groove quantize a lot, just until notes seem to fit in place...
This and drum edit are probably the two features that keep me locked to Cubase.
Music with dinner is an insult both to the cook and the violinist.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, I've been using Iterative Quantize a lot more, that's been useful. But when you guys are talking about Groove Quantizing, do you mean using Groove Quantizes derived from Hitpoints or from tweaking the Quantize Settings and saving them? I use that for swinging all the time, but I thought "Groove Quantize" refered specifically to analyzing audio and applying that feel to your MIDI. But if it means being able to flexibly adjust the quantization, then hell yeah, Cubase is excellent for it.
-
- Banned
- 18651 posts since 2 Oct, 2001 from England
im aware of that.smart wrote:Quantizing and Humanizing are basically the same thing, just going in the opposite direction.
thanks, i see what you mean now. They are called Groove Templates in Orion, and you can write your own. There are a few included, but not many. Not sure about capturing the start times etc, can you not just copy paste the pattern?Cap'n Spanky wrote:We are taking about groove patterns or groove quantizing as Sonar and Cubase call it. This is not regular quantizing or humanizing.Kriminal wrote:so are we talknig about Quantising, Humaising or Groove patterns???
Either way, OP has thenm all, but im not sure what you are trying to do.
..and even more so, why would you want to sound out of time/human? proper daft....
Here's an example: Stylus RMX has midi grooves. If you examine Stylus midi files in your piano roll, you'll see that many of the midi notes don't start exactly on the 1/8 note or 1/16 note. They start a few midi tics early or a few tics late. So instead of a note starting at 13:02:480, it starts at 13:02:476. This variation creates a unique groove.
Groove quantize captures those start times and allows you to transfer them to other midi (or audio) files. It can also perform other tasks, like transfering velocity and note lenth. My main concern is with start times.
For what ever reason, the process is not working properly in Sonar 4 and I have no reason to believe that Sonar 5 is any better.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 460 posts since 28 Jan, 2003
Thanks for all the input everyone!! Maybe this is old school thinking, but the simplicity of working in one host is appealing. From that stand point Cubase looks good.
Cap'n Spanky
From the Planet Screwball
From the Planet Screwball
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Cap'n Spanky wrote:Thanks for all the input everyone!! Maybe this is old school thinking, but the simplicity of working in one host is appealing. From that stand point Cubase looks good.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 460 posts since 28 Jan, 2003
EDIT: In the interest of world peace, my comment here has been zapped!

Last edited by Cap'n Spanky on Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cap'n Spanky
From the Planet Screwball
From the Planet Screwball
-
- KVRAF
- 2644 posts since 17 Apr, 2004
If you're anything like me, and you want the piano roll to be easy to use, don't go the Cubase route. Whenever I am forced to use Cubase, it drives me absolutely spare. I don't care how much a piece of software can do; if it's fiddly and annoying to use it, I don't use it. I admit that I'm more unforgiving than some though, being an IT guy and not just a musician. After all, a lot of people don't seem bothered by the unneccesary clicks and 10 seconds Cubase requires for a task that takes just 3 seconds elsewhere.
FL is how piano roll editing should be done. None of Cubase's unnecessary clicking hither and thither until you give up in frustration, where the piano roll isn't well thought out at all IMO. It seems to cater solely to minimalist post-editing of tracks (that you've recorded live via MIDI in). Anything more, and you'll go mad with frustration!
In FL, you can compose in the piano roll really easily. Admittedly, I haven't used Cubase for 2 years, so it might not be as awful as it used to be. But Steinberg never were any good at UI design, so I remain sceptical...
FL is how piano roll editing should be done. None of Cubase's unnecessary clicking hither and thither until you give up in frustration, where the piano roll isn't well thought out at all IMO. It seems to cater solely to minimalist post-editing of tracks (that you've recorded live via MIDI in). Anything more, and you'll go mad with frustration!
In FL, you can compose in the piano roll really easily. Admittedly, I haven't used Cubase for 2 years, so it might not be as awful as it used to be. But Steinberg never were any good at UI design, so I remain sceptical...
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Oh, man - let's not go there! Cap'n Spanky, conventional wisdom would suggest to me that whatever you like using and what fits your needs best is the best. We can debate this till the cows come home, there's always something that one has that the others don't. Take sjm's FL arguments: when I've tried FLStudio, it will literally take me ALL DAY to get a basic VSTi/MIDI playing back correctly. I simply do not know that program and am used to working in a certain way, despite the fact that FL kicks ass.
That stuff is so subjective, it's hardly worth lingering on. I despise using all other sequencers other than Cubase (actually Tracktion and Ext are shaping up nicely...), and that's cool, but I totally acknowledge that these other powerful hosts with thousands/millions of users must be doing something right, so why bash 'em! I just bonded with my host, and that's all there is to it. I only recommend Cubase based on the strengths I know. I don't think all the other Piano Rolls suck it, I just don't know.
Anyway, let's avoid a host war. I find it interesting in these threads to learn about what the other guy's strengths are, and learn about stuff I've missed in my own.
That stuff is so subjective, it's hardly worth lingering on. I despise using all other sequencers other than Cubase (actually Tracktion and Ext are shaping up nicely...), and that's cool, but I totally acknowledge that these other powerful hosts with thousands/millions of users must be doing something right, so why bash 'em! I just bonded with my host, and that's all there is to it. I only recommend Cubase based on the strengths I know. I don't think all the other Piano Rolls suck it, I just don't know.
Anyway, let's avoid a host war. I find it interesting in these threads to learn about what the other guy's strengths are, and learn about stuff I've missed in my own.
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
I don't care what anyone says....Cubase has some of the most powerful midi editing tools available. They so often get ignored around these parts....excellent stuff. Besides, F*ck piano rolls...learn how to play your keyboard. 
Peace
Peace
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 460 posts since 28 Jan, 2003
I'm sure the answer to this dumb question is yes, but does Fruity allow you to export your midi tracks to another host??sjm wrote: FL is how piano roll editing should be done.
I was thinking I could lay down my scratch tracks and do all my heavy midi composing and editing in FL, and then transfer the midi files to Samplitude, where I'd finish the project off.
Cap'n Spanky
From the Planet Screwball
From the Planet Screwball
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
I think so...but you have to change all the tracks to midi output tracks, and as far as I remember, doing so is not reversible.Cap'n Spanky wrote:I'm sure the answer to this dumb question is yes, but does Fruity allow you to export your midi tracks to another host??sjm wrote: FL is how piano roll editing should be done.
I was thinking I could lay down my scratch tracks and do all my heavy midi composing and editing in FL, and then transfer the midi files to Samplitude, where I'd finish the project off.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Hey!TotcProductions wrote:I don't care what anyone says....Cubase has some of the most powerful midi editing tools available. They so often get ignored around these parts....excellent stuff. Besides, F*ck piano rolls...learn how to play your keyboard.
Peace
