http://www.kvraudio.com/get/2441.html
(Not harping on the plug by the way...just think it's funny in lieu of the current trend
fabi wrote:well now we can get that post-vintage sound of de-taperized (nichols, one for you) tapes by using wow'n'flutter and adding this little beauty after it.
bound to make it sound like a tape recording that doesn't sound like tape recording anymore....![]()
it's a vibrato basically, easily measured and a steady frequency. then you just apply another vibrato on top with inverse phase. voila, flutter gone.Jason Brian Merrill wrote:how the heck is this possible? how can you take flutter away?
Kingston wrote:it's a vibrato basically, easily measured and a steady frequency. then you just apply another vibrato on top with inverse phase. voila, flutter gone.Jason Brian Merrill wrote:how the heck is this possible? how can you take flutter away?
so does it analyze the tape flutter aforetime, or is flutter always exactly the same?Kingston wrote:it's a vibrato basically, easily measured and a steady frequency. then you just apply another vibrato on top with inverse phase. voila, flutter gone.Jason Brian Merrill wrote:how the heck is this possible? how can you take flutter away?
sure...unless it turns into flitter...then you've got problems.Jason Brian Merrill wrote:so does it analyze the tape flutter aforetime, or is flutter always exactly the same?Kingston wrote:it's a vibrato basically, easily measured and a steady frequency. then you just apply another vibrato on top with inverse phase. voila, flutter gone.Jason Brian Merrill wrote:how the heck is this possible? how can you take flutter away?
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026