The environment of Live has a very good overview...for LIVE-sessons the best solution i have ever seen. P5 & Reason are also LIVE-compatible but i think for alot too complex or too long winded.
Therefore i did experiment with Live because u never know. To underline pdxindy's statment according Igor 4000's question ...yes it is a traditional sequencer indeed. That is one of the reason why it is very compatible together with Reason aswell. Live is no loop arranger like Fl.
Besides i have to agree @ djroby's too. Fl is indeed an easy to use with a fast learn-curve-possiblity. But i also think that Fl & Live are extream useable to Professionals. It's always just a question of taste & the individual workflow....look as example on Mike Oldfield's interview with the Fl-guyz (poweruser section)....he told he looked for an uncomplicated tool with a good overview. Fl doesn't overstrain the people with options like protools, sonar or mostly...the "so called" super allrounder and perfect Cubase. Further more...Fl as also P5 & Reason, ..invite u to experiment & discover.
Before i would ever use (on Mac) Protools i would prefer Reason & Logic Audio/Ableton Live. To the PC-sector it is Fl, P5, Reason & Renoise (personal taste of course).
Watch closely on Mike's big monitor....the next prefered sequencer is Reason....and i don't see any Sonar, Cubase or Pro Tools. And Mike is an expierenced veteran but a guy with an interest for fast workflow & good taste.
I personaly hate guyz or companies who un/directly try to subordinate their tool from the others. Of course the competition is a legitimate thing...but the arrogance not. Every Sequencer works fine when the User is able to adapt. This is something that i want to report to all those pseudo-wannabe-mr./ms. professionals.


