I prefer to think it's a typo and someone just got carried away adding "0"s.VariKusBrainZ wrote:spuddle wrote:Spend $13,000 on a MacPro![]()
this is tongue in cheek right
Mother of all PC's !!!
-
- KVRAF
- 1898 posts since 4 Mar, 2004 from The Forests of Lombard
-
- KVRist
- 315 posts since 7 Nov, 2005 from La Quinta, CA
I have been seeing that $13k price tag quote a lot. I went to the Apple website and built me one and only came to $7500.
Specifications
Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
4GB (4 x 1GB)
160GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512MB (2 x dual-link DVI)
Apple Cinema HD Display (23" flat panel)
Apple Cinema HD Display (23" flat panel)
1 x SuperDrive
Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse - U.S. English
Mac OS X - U.S. English
Specifications
Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
4GB (4 x 1GB)
160GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512MB (2 x dual-link DVI)
Apple Cinema HD Display (23" flat panel)
Apple Cinema HD Display (23" flat panel)
1 x SuperDrive
Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse - U.S. English
Mac OS X - U.S. English
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Some joker thought it'd be a fair comparison by outfitting the MacPro with 16 GB RAM. Hence the hefty pricetag.
-
- KVRist
- 487 posts since 19 Jan, 2003
No, the Core Duo / Yonah CPUs are not 64 bit capable. The Core 2 Duo is, but you cannot yet buy a laptop with a Core 2 Duo in it (soon, though). In any case 64bitness is mostly irrelevant for audio today and probably will stay that way for a couple more years.aieda_cin wrote:The 2.33ghz intel dual core yonah thing is 64 bit capable.
The price of the Mac Pro is comparable or better than similar workstation-class machines from Dell, IBM, HP, etc, so they are really a fine deal I think. Of course you can customize it to something really expensive if you want, but you certainly don't have to.
-
- KVRian
- 620 posts since 18 Nov, 2004 from Orlando, Bitches!
I lovvvveeee pineapples.
Why cry about your own desires, when I could have them and leave you standing in the sadness of your own....
-
- KVRian
- 620 posts since 18 Nov, 2004 from Orlando, Bitches!
And cake!
Why cry about your own desires, when I could have them and leave you standing in the sadness of your own....
-
- KVRAF
- 1898 posts since 4 Mar, 2004 from The Forests of Lombard
I suppose that depends on how you look at it.contrast wrote:In any case 64bitness is mostly irrelevant for audio today and probably will stay that way for a couple more years.
-
- KVRAF
- 4020 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Perth, Australia
Piping in a bit late here, but anyway:
Although user applications are limited to 2GB (or 3GB with /3GB switch) on windows XP, it is still worth going above that because the operating system will use any additional memory for itself. There are some RAM spamming tasks such as maintaining a cache of file read operations.
Although user applications are limited to 2GB (or 3GB with /3GB switch) on windows XP, it is still worth going above that because the operating system will use any additional memory for itself. There are some RAM spamming tasks such as maintaining a cache of file read operations.
SKoT McDonald
BFD | inMusic
BFD | inMusic
