I totally disagree here - does the world really need another one of anything? - I think it's safe to say that the answer is always 'no' - so what's the actual purpose of asking the question at all?darcyb62 wrote:Those are a couple of real good questions.Dewdman42 wrote:The pics look cool. Does the world really need another DAW? What is different about this one that would make it compelling to get over everything else that is out there already?
Podium 1.66 rocks
- KVRAF
- 25050 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
-
- KVRist
- 488 posts since 2 Mar, 2004
Funny... I would have to disagree with you on that as I think the answer should always be yes. Status quo should never be acceptable. It leads to a culture of mediocrity. If we honestly believed that a culture of mediocrity was acceptable there would be no progress and if we had no progress the we would eventually just fizzle away to nothing.jens wrote:I totally disagree here - does the world really need another one of anything? - I think it's safe to say that the answer is always 'no' - so what's the actual purpose of asking the question at all?
- KVRAF
- 25050 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I think we actually totally agree with each other - for each individual thing the answer is always 'no' but if we would consider this answer relevant then the result would be fatal.darcyb62 wrote:Funny... I would have to disagree with you on that as I think the answer should always be yes. Status quo should never be acceptable. It leads to a culture of mediocrity. If we honestly believed that a culture of mediocrity was acceptable there would be no progress and if we had no progress the we would eventually just fizzle away to nothing.jens wrote:I totally disagree here - does the world really need another one of anything? - I think it's safe to say that the answer is always 'no' - so what's the actual purpose of asking the question at all?
Hence the question is totally irrelevant as answering it has no positive purpose at all...
-
- KVRist
- 488 posts since 2 Mar, 2004
I'm okay with that...jens wrote:I think we actually totally agree with each other - for each individual thing the answer is always 'no' but if we would consider this answer relevant then the result would be fatal.
Hence the question is totally irrelevant as answering it has no positive purpose at all...- and that was my point!
- KVRAF
- 25050 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
-
- KVRian
- 1214 posts since 10 Aug, 2005
Oooh stop being silly child!John Vulich wrote:Here's a Brownie Button for you...
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
-
- KVRAF
- 3528 posts since 18 Apr, 2002 from British Columbia, Canada
i just have to say that it was really a breath of fresh air to see that waste of oxygen finally get called on his trolling. even if it didn't even slow him down, it was nice.
I am quite surprised to hear that disparaging remarks have ever been posted about this program. It may not be right for everyone (what a boring world that would be) but even if I didn't like working with it (which i do) I would find it very hard to criticize such a well thought out and efficient DAW.
1.66 is really a good step forward.
And Zynewayve: thanx for the tip on dragging an effect to the edge of a track to wrap it in a new channel. Nice shortcut there

I am quite surprised to hear that disparaging remarks have ever been posted about this program. It may not be right for everyone (what a boring world that would be) but even if I didn't like working with it (which i do) I would find it very hard to criticize such a well thought out and efficient DAW.
1.66 is really a good step forward.
And Zynewayve: thanx for the tip on dragging an effect to the edge of a track to wrap it in a new channel. Nice shortcut there
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Yeah, I didn't know about that one either. Makes the chain much faster to set up.Z3R0T0N1N wrote:And Zynewayve: thanx for the tip on dragging an effect to the edge of a track to wrap it in a new channel. Nice shortcut there![]()
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- KVRist
- 111 posts since 1 Dec, 2003 from Denmark
A lot of users have asked questions about the hierarchic engine, so last night I created a small illustrated tutorial that tries to explain the principles behind the hierarchic engine. Users that have been perplexed by the hierarchic track tree may find this helpful:
http://www.zynewave.com/wiki/doku.php?i ... acks:index
http://www.zynewave.com/wiki/doku.php?i ... acks:index
-
- KVRian
- 966 posts since 28 Sep, 2002 from UK
Cool Frits - just what I've been waiting for !Zynewave wrote:A lot of users have asked questions about the hierarchic engine, so last night I created a small illustrated tutorial that tries to explain the principles behind the hierarchic engine. Users that have been perplexed by the hierarchic track tree may find this helpful:
http://www.zynewave.com/wiki/doku.php?i ... acks:index
Don't take this the wrong way but, as this is this seems to be a central paradigm for Podium, you should of done this at the start !
BC
If God did exist (and he doesn't) he would answer to the name of Maurizio
-
- KVRAF
- 8389 posts since 11 Apr, 2003 from back on the hillside again - but now with a garden!
..well there is a video about the heirarchical engine that's been up on the site for over year.. 
tbh, I picked it up straight away, and never really had any problem with the concept. It's a kind of linearly presented modularity, mapping out a common routing paradigm with a new visualization.
And you can quote me on that
DSP
tbh, I picked it up straight away, and never really had any problem with the concept. It's a kind of linearly presented modularity, mapping out a common routing paradigm with a new visualization.
And you can quote me on that
DSP
-
- KVRian
- 966 posts since 28 Sep, 2002 from UK
Dohduncanparsons wrote:..well there is a video about the heirarchical engine that's been up on the site for over year..
If God did exist (and he doesn't) he would answer to the name of Maurizio




