KVR Audio

mistertoast · Post by **mistertoast** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:59 pm

"Ritual" sure looks like a Tweakbench plug.

thecontrolcentre · Post by **thecontrolcentre** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:06 pm

tuz wrote:

can't wait for tomorrow ...

it's better than xmas

Moody33 · Post by **Moody33** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:11 pm

I'm curious..what's this??

http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/2356 ... laykb6.jpg

RPH · Post by **RPH** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:14 pm

I'm sorry but, what is going on ?????

Everybody was suppost to NOT show their developer name on the plugin, but i see several entries with their names on it....
Now everybody knows who made that plugin, and i thought it would remain a secret till after the voting.

Or am i wrong?

Cya,
Rob.

diverdee · Post by **diverdee** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:15 pm

Some interesting looking gear there for sure.

Majken · Post by **Majken** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:19 pm

XGmode: Not sure, I never saw anything about that in the rules. But I might've missed out on some thread somewhere. I was kind of inactive in the forum for a month or two. Then again I suppose with the teaser threads hiding the name wouldn't have made any difference anyway.

/Majken

Moody33 · Post by **Moody33** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm

XGmode wrote:I'm sorry but, what is going on ?????

Everybody was suppost to NOT show their name on the plugin, but i see several entries with their names on it....
Now everybody knows who made that plugin, and i thought it would remain a secret till after the voting.

Or am i wrong?

Cya,
Rob.

Where it is indicates?

brambos · Post by **brambos** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:21 pm

XGmode wrote:Everybody was suppost to NOT show their name on the plugin, but i see several entries with their names on it....

It wasn't in the rules posted on the DC'06-page.

Anyhow.. I don't think most people will vote based on author, but based on the actual entry so it shouldn't make much difference.

Funny to see how some developers really have a recognizable "signature" design for their products. I think it shows best with Tweakbench Ritual.

Ildon · Post by **Ildon** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:28 pm

VladimirDimitrievich wrote:
tuz wrote:

I second that!

Holy crap.

Moody33 · Post by **Moody33** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:28 pm

Funny to see how some developers really have a recognizable "signature" design for their products. I think it shows best with Tweakbench Ritual

mdsp signature too!

stefancrs · Post by **stefancrs** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:29 pm

Some of these looks ooooh so awesome. Really great work by all the participants!

RPH · Post by **RPH** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:29 pm

yea indeed,. i rechecked the rules and it's not there.

I remember from the start there was debate about naming the developer of the plugin, but i guess i missed that is wasn't added to the rules.

nvm.

mistertoast · Post by **mistertoast** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:31 pm

So I'm curious about how the developers liked the tool. How was the learning curve? Could you do all the low-level things you wanted to do?

RPH · Post by **RPH** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:33 pm

mistertoast wrote:So I'm curious about how the developers liked the tool. How was the learning curve?

Hi,

What tool?

mistertoast · Post by **mistertoast** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:35 pm

I was thinking about Synthmaker. Sorry.

Full Screenshots of Developer Challenge Entries