I had a denormalisation problem in one of my modules
fixed now, enjoy!
MST VS-1000R - Update Avaliable - CPU Usage Problem Solved
-
- KVRist
- 288 posts since 18 Jul, 2005 from Somewhere
http://mst.metabin.com/free/MST_VS-1000R_R3.rar
I had a denormalisation problem in one of my modules
fixed now, enjoy!
I had a denormalisation problem in one of my modules
fixed now, enjoy!
-
- KVRian
- 1399 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
----Not to be a party pooper, but I'm getting worse cpu usage out of it than before, like almost twice on some patches. Maybe there's another denormal prob in there or something ? Looking forward to it if you can lower the cpu from what it was originally though, good sounding synth.
Jeff
Jeff
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 288 posts since 18 Jul, 2005 from Somewhere
What is your cpu?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 288 posts since 18 Jul, 2005 from Somewhere
Can you try deleting the MST VS-1000R folder in your vstplugins folder, then starting your host again?
-
- KVRian
- 1399 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
----I'm running a P4 2400Mhz system, fairly optimized, not an off the shelf model.
----I erased the folder, opened FL Studio, made sure it didn't show up, then reinstalled it in the vst folder, and started FL Studio again. It seems to behave about the same as the original version did now, cpu usage-wise. About where you said it would originally, between 16%-30% usually, for one or two voices at a time. Previously I had opened a little scratch track I had been working on with it from the other day, after replacing it with the new version you posted here, and it performed worse cpu-wise initially for some reason.
----I'm not too overly concerned about it, it just limits the times when I would/could use this synth is all. It does sound great to me though, a real surprise and treat.
Jeff
----I erased the folder, opened FL Studio, made sure it didn't show up, then reinstalled it in the vst folder, and started FL Studio again. It seems to behave about the same as the original version did now, cpu usage-wise. About where you said it would originally, between 16%-30% usually, for one or two voices at a time. Previously I had opened a little scratch track I had been working on with it from the other day, after replacing it with the new version you posted here, and it performed worse cpu-wise initially for some reason.
----I'm not too overly concerned about it, it just limits the times when I would/could use this synth is all. It does sound great to me though, a real surprise and treat.
Jeff