Seems like this 'developer' is at the level of, or below, his users.
So it's all good.
FL Studio 6 vs Cubase Sx 3 TEST!!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
cryogenic useless bedroom musician , i would really like to see your development skill 
Organising a protest march this Friday Schlesische Strasse 28 ,10997 Berlin, Germany
-
- KVRist
- 471 posts since 18 Mar, 2004
What does that have to do with anything??Vonbrucken wrote:cryogenic useless bedroom musician , i would really like to see your development skill
Or are you just being french.
History is full of two kinds of people.
-
- KVRAF
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
no it is just me laughing at you usless man
Organising a protest march this Friday Schlesische Strasse 28 ,10997 Berlin, Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
the usual answer of someone that have nothing to add so impressed by his lack of utility , that he can not even run and he is just being able to answer even more useless things that the ones he said just before
so lay down miserable man !!
so lay down miserable man !!
Organising a protest march this Friday Schlesische Strasse 28 ,10997 Berlin, Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 8705 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
even more remarkable than the original post is the 7 pages of crap following it
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRAF
- 8705 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
pan laws are the new PDCThe Chase wrote:What do you mean though. You say you discover the pan laws but Gol needs to get some pan laws? I just dont understandLeft Headphone wrote:You get what you pay for... plus rudeness... what a waste...
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- Banned
- 1149 posts since 7 Mar, 2004
Well FLS sounds way better than SX3 PC version.
The SX3 Mac version it's whole different story, Macs have tube RAM... they rule!
Plus the engineers at Steinberg make Cubase to sound worse just for the FLS dudes feel better about it.
*Let's see who tops this one at the loosers convention
The SX3 Mac version it's whole different story, Macs have tube RAM... they rule!
Plus the engineers at Steinberg make Cubase to sound worse just for the FLS dudes feel better about it.
*Let's see who tops this one at the loosers convention
-
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
let me add a spoonful.spaceman wrote:even more remarkable than the original post is the 7 pages of crap following it
*fart*
bet you it would sound better through SX3 though, with even more warmth.
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
Cryogenic wrote:The usual roar of an FL user's level.
-
- KVRist
- 496 posts since 23 Sep, 2003 from Washington
I bought sx 3. I want rearrangable insert fx, and unlimited slots. Fruityloops has those. Cubase doesn't. I still use cubase because the interface is easier for me. It's more along the lines of how I think. I e-mailed Steinberg my idea. Like any other company they didn't do anything. Update coming soon!!...... It's the carrot in front of the Rabbit's nose if you ask me.
STEINBERG IF YOU EVER GET ON KVR AND READ THIS, GIVE ME MY DAMN REARRANGEABLE & UNLIMITED INSERT FX AND WE'RE GOOD.
FruityLoops is neat, but visually you see a loop/limit so your mind feels compelled not to "carry things over" into the next measure. Technically you can, but you shouldn't have to struggle to see the big picture. That's my opinion on both of em. Oh, and Cubase sucks w/ some vst support issues, and the dongle can rot in hell because it hangs. I have seen Fruity crash a few times randomly also. VST support will be an issue in any host, period, but the dongle really does bite. Essentially Cubase Users, you are going to be looking at getting something like Spark Effects for the rearrangable insert fx, which is more resources, but hey, w/e. As for fruity though, you can't really rearrange the interface itself unless you suddenly had the track view open to a grid editor (& guess what.... cubase loops even in grid mode just like fruity
!), in which case you are reinventing the wheel.
Also, I know some of you at least have wondered about Vonbrucken's sig & what those two girls in the inverted picture that is squashed that are making out look like so I did you a favor.
STEINBERG IF YOU EVER GET ON KVR AND READ THIS, GIVE ME MY DAMN REARRANGEABLE & UNLIMITED INSERT FX AND WE'RE GOOD.
FruityLoops is neat, but visually you see a loop/limit so your mind feels compelled not to "carry things over" into the next measure. Technically you can, but you shouldn't have to struggle to see the big picture. That's my opinion on both of em. Oh, and Cubase sucks w/ some vst support issues, and the dongle can rot in hell because it hangs. I have seen Fruity crash a few times randomly also. VST support will be an issue in any host, period, but the dongle really does bite. Essentially Cubase Users, you are going to be looking at getting something like Spark Effects for the rearrangable insert fx, which is more resources, but hey, w/e. As for fruity though, you can't really rearrange the interface itself unless you suddenly had the track view open to a grid editor (& guess what.... cubase loops even in grid mode just like fruity
!), in which case you are reinventing the wheel. Also, I know some of you at least have wondered about Vonbrucken's sig & what those two girls in the inverted picture that is squashed that are making out look like so I did you a favor.
--_ yup.... _--