KVR Audio

Gregjazz · Post by **Gregjazz** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:54 am

moonlite wrote:superddman, here's exactly the right thing for you - anechoic rooms have the tendency to absorb much of the harshness of digital sound, if that's what you want? also, some analogue muddiness can be removed by carefully tweaking the control. just try it out. (doesn't work as well as a real anechoic room, though)

http://www.dontcrack.com/freeware/downl ... Simulator/

the effect is quite subtle but if you have good monitors you can get incredible results!

You're right, I get some incredible results with this! It really tightens the mix and adds clarity to all the instruments!!

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:01 am

850Hz is a really naughty frequency

moonlite · Post by **moonlite** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:04 am

tony tony chopper wrote:850Hz is a really naughty frequency

yeah, it's the muddy part of the generally nasty frequencies around 1khz. imho it should be banned altogether.

shanecgriffo · Post by **shanecgriffo** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:10 am

har-bal does the job.. sadly stand alone and not vst tho'
http://www.har-bal.com/
you would tend to do it on a complete mix

superddman · Post by **superddman** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:49 am

I know you can do this with a normal eq, but there is a range of frequencies that just don't do us any good. Why not have a way to automatically get rid of them?

kaden · Post by **kaden** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:51 am

I propose we introduce a rigorously enforced program of frequency profiling, to identify potential bad frequencies before they have an opportunity to endanger freedom loving democracies, and the U.S. too.

Once potential bad, crazy, and wrongminded frequencies have been targetted, we'll nuke 'em from orbit.

It's the only way to be sure...

John Vulich · Post by **John Vulich** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:53 am

superddman wrote:...but there is a range of frequencies that just don't do us any good.

Care to define which frequencies? And where did you get this idea from anyway?

moonlite · Post by **moonlite** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:00 am

superddman wrote:I know you can do this with a normal eq, but there is a range of frequencies that just don't do us any good. Why not have a way to automatically get rid of them? :)

what frequencies do you mean?

if you mean infrasound, different people tend to want to handle it different ways, so it's best the choise is given to them.

what else is there? the brown note?

moonlite · Post by **moonlite** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:03 am

superddman wrote:Why not have a way to automatically get rid of them? :)

why don't you just put an eq in your sequencers default template that cuts the brown noten and below 15 hz?

isn't that "automatic" enough? then you never need to touch it again?

Shane Sanders · Post by **Shane Sanders** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:04 am

moonlite · Post by **moonlite** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:05 am

oh and dont forget the anechoic room simulator. put that on the master bus, too! preferably in every track as the first effect, too, so the evil frequencies won't create problems in the mixdown stage or confuse the fx.

Shane Sanders · Post by **Shane Sanders** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:05 am

fre quincies

moonlite · Post by **moonlite** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:08 am

aetmos · Post by **aetmos** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:09 am

shamann wrote:What are the craziest of the crazy frequencies?

714Hz and 1280Hz. Everbody knows that...

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:11 am

you need some 64bit pan laws to remove bad frequincies

Plugin that automatically removes bad frequencies?