Whatever they say, this isn't me !
... .. .
A nice man that made an enormous mistake, i'm afraid...S.HUSH wrote:Leave Roger alone. He's a very nice man.
Well he should have known better. Do some research about your users before just jumping in there and changing the (raping) the product.. Why didnt he gradually transition the product instead of assuming that current owners of the product would just simply conform to the changes? He could have consulted with people 1st, gotten some user feedback.. What ever happens in this debaukle Roger has no one to blame but himself.. And dont let me start on given zero recognition to the original developers.. If you'd never heard of EA you'd think Roger was a genius..Lagrange wrote:I dont think he had a choice. I mean the amount of flaming he got here must have killed his sales! Which is a good thing IMO. Shows that KVR is a powerful force to recon with!!hibidy wrote:I didn't know that the challenge/response had been added......
Hey, it's something.....I'm always glad when someone listens and at least tries..........
diverdee wrote:I'm kinda feeling sorry for the guy now.
I had the same problems with the 2016 and they never refused to issue a code (they actually told me I had the world record by the 5th time!Seaside Music wrote:If the C/R scheme is anything like Princeton Digital's, I'd rather have the dongle...and I won't do dongle's, other than Samplitude. I finally ditched my 2016 reverb because every tiny thing I did in my system caused it to issue a new challenge code, and the devs really pushed me to buy an ilok by basically telling me they weren't going to keep issueing response codes to me. It was a cool reverb, and not cheap, but between Samplitude's Variverb, and the UAD stuff, I just decided I could live without it. Still wish I could get my money back.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026