I'm putting it out there right now...any product marketed in the above named manner will be purchased by me (perhaps twice), soley for the comedic value. What can I say? I have a dark sense of humor.Bobby Hull wrote:What's to stop IK from using images of Mark David Chapman to sell a plug-in designed to "kill" certain rogue frequencies on Walls And Bridges?
Oh and I love John Lennon and the Beatles so it's not about that.
And IK's got it wrong if they think pimpin' products out is easy. Pimpin' ain't easy.
Can we all agree that IK isn't seriously promoting pimping? At worst it was a failed attempt to be cool. I'd be more offended by the fact that it was just bad advertising than try and find any deeper meaning behind it. Sure, Bobby and aMused kind of have a point, but it is rather reactionary. If you're a liberal you should be all for allowing companies to say whatever they want, instead of playing PC police. That's where the left really went wrong if you ask me. And it seems like you're just looking to be offended if you refuse to take it in good humor (this isn't Michael Richards we're talking about here).
If you don't like the ad, you should be voicing your opinion to IK directly (or at least in the Everything Else section), not going on the forum of a company that's partnered with them (i.e. not IKMM) and trying to start up a boycott. And let's face it; we've all seen more egregious and misogynist things in advertising. IK was probably just trying to make their advertising stand out a little by being a little silly, and it's apparently worked.

