How many of you know music theory?If not,do you feel limited
-
- KVRAF
- 7879 posts since 16 Apr, 2003 from -on the outside looking in
I would love to have a deep understanding of theory and become proficient with an instrument. I feel as though the creative spark is not what I lack, but the tools to build on it. I'd kill for enough time and money for a piano teacher and some theory classes.
..what goes around comes around..
-
- KVRist
- 397 posts since 7 Jun, 2003 from Sedna the Red Planet
The Walter Piston books give a good grounding in classical harmony/counterpoint. Schoenberg's is heavy and technical (and verbose!) but goes into harmony at an almost crazy depth.
-
- KVRAF
- 1868 posts since 26 Oct, 2002 from San Francisco
I highly doubt any kid of mine would choose classical over jazz. But sure, I'll give them the illusion of choiceHink wrote:let's hope when that time comes you let them choosejackson wrote:Tell you one thing for sure; when I have a kid, I'm sending them to jazz school instead of classical.
-
afreshcupofjoe afreshcupofjoe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=94815
- KVRAF
- 1838 posts since 17 Jan, 2006 from Portland, OR
"Music theory" and "music reading" skills have very little to do with each other. I don't feel that being able to read music or not in this day and age will make much of a difference. For a professional musician who does gigs in jazz groups, orchestras, pit bands, or for weddings or events it is very important. You have to be able to learn and interpret lots of music quickly and on the spot. But for the average producer or musician making music at home, or playing in a rock band with friends it is not important. Most of the guys who got famous doing this stuff don't know how to read music either. Notation is just a way of communicating with other musicians, and since technology has created many other ways of doing that, as well making it easier for solo musicians to do most of the work themselves, notation is becoming less and less relevant.
Music theory on the other hand is a whole different story. I am of the opinion that the importance and relevance of music theory is usually very personal thing. I couldn't live without it. I'm a very technically minded person and it's just how my head works. I know a lot of people that would probably be much better musicians if they would just learn some theory. It also, like notation, helps you to be able to communicate with other musicians easily. It's nice to be able to tell your bandmates that you are playing a A7 chord with a 3-4 suspension than try to spell out all of the notes, or even worse, show them the frets or keys. Even better yet, given that chord you will already know how different combinations of notes will sound over it, and you can easily pick out the notes you will use to construct a melody that is appropriate for the genre or mood you are trying to create. Some people think that learning music theory will make them think too much inside the box, but this is complete nonsense. If you actually follow theory past the basics (which CAN seem rather limiting) it will open up many doors and make you think about and understand music in ways you never would have without it.
However, there are some great musicians who just never really get theory. It just isn't how their head works, and for them it probably will never really matter. So I guess it's a personal thing.
For most genres of music I'd say that knowing music theory is great, but it isn't entirely necessary. Film may be an exception though. Because you have to know how to write for different moods and generate certain emotional responses or suspense in certain parts of the film, it seems like it would be very important to know your theory. This is exactly what theory is good at doing: it helps you create exactly what you want when you want it.
Music theory on the other hand is a whole different story. I am of the opinion that the importance and relevance of music theory is usually very personal thing. I couldn't live without it. I'm a very technically minded person and it's just how my head works. I know a lot of people that would probably be much better musicians if they would just learn some theory. It also, like notation, helps you to be able to communicate with other musicians easily. It's nice to be able to tell your bandmates that you are playing a A7 chord with a 3-4 suspension than try to spell out all of the notes, or even worse, show them the frets or keys. Even better yet, given that chord you will already know how different combinations of notes will sound over it, and you can easily pick out the notes you will use to construct a melody that is appropriate for the genre or mood you are trying to create. Some people think that learning music theory will make them think too much inside the box, but this is complete nonsense. If you actually follow theory past the basics (which CAN seem rather limiting) it will open up many doors and make you think about and understand music in ways you never would have without it.
However, there are some great musicians who just never really get theory. It just isn't how their head works, and for them it probably will never really matter. So I guess it's a personal thing.
For most genres of music I'd say that knowing music theory is great, but it isn't entirely necessary. Film may be an exception though. Because you have to know how to write for different moods and generate certain emotional responses or suspense in certain parts of the film, it seems like it would be very important to know your theory. This is exactly what theory is good at doing: it helps you create exactly what you want when you want it.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
my kids seem to choose drawing over music and I can't draw a straight linejackson wrote:I highly doubt any kid of mine would choose classical over jazz. But sure, I'll give them the illusion of choiceHink wrote:let's hope when that time comes you let them choosejackson wrote:Tell you one thing for sure; when I have a kid, I'm sending them to jazz school instead of classical.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
That's totally how I feel. The biggest reservation, though, is finding a good teacher and not wasting my time and money.ouroboros wrote:I would love to have a deep understanding of theory and become proficient with an instrument. I feel as though the creative spark is not what I lack, but the tools to build on it. I'd kill for enough time and money for a piano teacher and some theory classes.
I do feel somewhat better after reading on Thomas Dolby's blog that he cannot read music and has little-to-no training, just like me. I was floored. Listening to the complex jazz chords he favours and layered arrangements, you'd swear he knew all there is to know about theory! At the end of the day, you can't beat raw talent.
-
- KVRist
- 492 posts since 26 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver BC
Theory is pretty essential if you aspire to actually play with other musicians.
Efficient communication, doncha know.
The agony of watching the guitarist teach the bassist a song the 'first string, second fret 4 times, then second string, fourth fret twice' method is likely the reason a lot of musicians develop substance abuse issues.
Efficient communication, doncha know.
The agony of watching the guitarist teach the bassist a song the 'first string, second fret 4 times, then second string, fourth fret twice' method is likely the reason a lot of musicians develop substance abuse issues.
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRist
- 176 posts since 17 Aug, 2006
When I was a kid I had a big band but no sheet music for it. So I took swing jazz arrangements, put them on tape and tone per tone, notated them. It was tedious and I can not tell how often I had to rewind. It did not help that I could not really play the piano and did not even know the bass key first. Really crazy jazz chords, and nailing down that third sax was not easy at all - but I succeeded finally.
This time has served me much because later on conservatory I just had to learn the official names for what I heard and knew anyhow. So yes, I have a theoretical background but listening was first. It is still so.
Hannes
This time has served me much because later on conservatory I just had to learn the official names for what I heard and knew anyhow. So yes, I have a theoretical background but listening was first. It is still so.
Hannes
Maybe doing jokes without the use of smilies ...
-
- KVRAF
- 7879 posts since 16 Apr, 2003 from -on the outside looking in
exactly.nuffink wrote:Yeah you can. It's easy. Raw talent backed up by a solid knowledge of theory.bduffy wrote:At the end of the day, you can't beat raw talent.
I hope for a little of both.
..what goes around comes around..
-
afreshcupofjoe afreshcupofjoe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=94815
- KVRAF
- 1838 posts since 17 Jan, 2006 from Portland, OR
Jesus don't remind me! I've left too many rock bands for exactly that reason. It's amazing that they can ever get anywhere. What's worse is when you're the bassist and you have to tell the freaking guitarist what to do. I'd rather shoot myself in the face than go through that again.kaden wrote: The agony of watching the guitarist teach the bassist a song the 'first string, second fret 4 times, then second string, fourth fret twice' method is likely the reason a lot of musicians develop substance abuse issues.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Well, I didn't mean to imply that you shouldn't know your theory at all!ouroboros wrote:exactly.nuffink wrote:Yeah you can. It's easy. Raw talent backed up by a solid knowledge of theory.bduffy wrote:At the end of the day, you can't beat raw talent.
I hope for a little of both.
EDIT: ACtually, no, ignore that. He probably knows theory up the wazoo; that's different than reading. Anyway, I shouldn't have worded that so.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 49 posts since 7 Sep, 2005
Man, 24 responses in 2 hours - I'm impressed.
I guess I meant just "reading music". While I can't read music, and could not say what a particular chord is (othar then simple, obvious stuff like major, minor, minor 7th, etc), as far as theory goes I guess I have an instinctual understanding of it. A feel for it.
I guess I meant just "reading music". While I can't read music, and could not say what a particular chord is (othar then simple, obvious stuff like major, minor, minor 7th, etc), as far as theory goes I guess I have an instinctual understanding of it. A feel for it.
Oh god, I'd kill for the resources to do something like that. I can see myself spending sh!tloads on orchestral samples, but it would be so much better to just hire an awesome group of players to make what's in my head a reality.joanaphone wrote:...I know one guy who wanted some orchestral stuff on some tracks and was considering buying one of those fantastically priced orchestral rompler sets. He thougth about it for a bit, and because he is a bit crazy, he spent the same money on flying out to Croatia and hiring a whole orchestra for a week! He printed out his score from logic audio, setup his guitar in the middle of the orchestra and played then through what he was trying to get at. the end results are on a (reasonably) well known commercial recording and it sounds fantastic, so don't let anythign hold you back - if you have the ideas, go for it!
-
- KVRAF
- 13442 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
I know a shitload about music theory. Sometimes it helps (even a lot), sometimes it seems to be getting in my way (even a lot). A tradeoff situation, really.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
Chuck E. Jesus Chuck E. Jesus https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=108246
- R.I.P.
- 7301 posts since 23 May, 2006 from in between a cornfield and a river

