Chord progression and chord inversion
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 24 Jan, 2007
Hi everyone, I'm currently trying to creatively make different chord progressions just for the fun of it. Just a simple chord progression over 4 mesures. Not in any specific mode, I'm exploring everything to see if I can come up with a cool one.
I haven't set up any kind of rules or anything to keep the creativity as free as possible. But I seem to have decided to start the chord progression with a first inversion chord all the time (root position). Then I would use inversion on the other one to have all the chords close together on the keyboard.
Is this non-sens or does it actually make sens to always start the progression with a root position chord when trying to find a new good progression?
I haven't set up any kind of rules or anything to keep the creativity as free as possible. But I seem to have decided to start the chord progression with a first inversion chord all the time (root position). Then I would use inversion on the other one to have all the chords close together on the keyboard.
Is this non-sens or does it actually make sens to always start the progression with a root position chord when trying to find a new good progression?
-
- KVRAF
- 1975 posts since 4 Feb, 2005
-
JumpingJackFlash JumpingJackFlash https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=44005
- KVRian
- 1227 posts since 10 Oct, 2004
Huh? - The chord is either in first inversion or it's in root position; it can't be both!jee_pack wrote:I seem to have decided to start the chord progression with a first inversion chord all the time (root position).
An anacrusis is a melodic thing, not a harmonic thing. While your statement may be true in practise, it may be confusing to explain it as such.Toxikator wrote:It's not uncommon to start with the tonic chord in root position, as it establishes key.
If the passage does NOT start with this chord, it's TYPICALLY an anacrusis, though not always.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 70 posts since 24 Jan, 2007
HAHA your right, I knew what I was thinking about, sorry to all those out there who might have been confused by this little error.... thanks for correcting meJumpingJackFlash wrote: Huh? - The chord is either in first inversion or it's in root position; it can't be both!

