Should I normalize single-shot samples?
-
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 7 Oct, 2003
I am sampling one of my synths as a series of single-shot samples. Everything is fine except that the samples vary in volume.
Is it a good idea to normalize them afterwards (using "Maximize Peak Value" setting)?
If normalizing is a bad idea, what would you suggest to bring up their volumes?
Is it a good idea to normalize them afterwards (using "Maximize Peak Value" setting)?
If normalizing is a bad idea, what would you suggest to bring up their volumes?
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Normalising is fine.The only problems is if they vary a lot in volume you might get differences in quality but you have to mess up quite bad for that to be noticable.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 677 posts since 7 Oct, 2003
Cool, cooljupiter8 wrote:Normalising is fine.The only problems is if they vary a lot in volume you might get differences in quality but you have to mess up quite bad for that to be noticable.
What about normalizing using "Maximize Peak Value" setting? Is that the correct way to do this?
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Trying to think of a single reason not to and can't think of any. Maximise peak value should be fine.
-
- KVRAF
- 2495 posts since 18 May, 2004 from ATL-USA
When you normalize the samples, it will raise the noisefloor as well. Hence, samples that have not been normalized will have less noise. You should be ok in this case, but it makes me wonder, how did you sample? Could velocity be the culprit?
Anti-aliasing is for "synthmonk%ys".
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 677 posts since 7 Oct, 2003
Ok, thanks for your help. So I will definitelly normalize all samples afterwards using "Maximize Peak Value" setting.
On the other hand, should the velocity be set at the default level or should I maximize it when sampling?
Also, do you guys recommend some FX applied on the Master output when sampling?
On the other hand, should the velocity be set at the default level or should I maximize it when sampling?
Also, do you guys recommend some FX applied on the Master output when sampling?
-
- KVRist
- 261 posts since 25 Jul, 2002 from UK
You could also record all the samples into one single audio file and then normalise the resulting big audio file before splitting into samples.
Charlie
ArtRage for Art | EnergyXT2 and Phrazor for Music | Blender for 3D
ArtRage for Art | EnergyXT2 and Phrazor for Music | Blender for 3D
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
If you want to sample the sound at maximum velocity obviously you must have max. velocity. The sound is most likely different at different velocities.I'm not sure i know what you mean.superddman wrote:Ok, thanks for your help. So I will definitelly normalize all samples afterwards using "Maximize Peak Value" setting.
On the other hand, should the velocity be set at the default level or should I maximize it when sampling?
Also, do you guys recommend some FX applied on the Master output when sampling?
FX depends. Some,like chorus can sound like crap 'cause it will speed up/down with the pitchshifting. Does'nt have to be noticable but can be very disturbing. Delay would be pretty annoying since you'd have different delay times on different pitches.
What would the point in that be ? Then only one sample would be truly normalised and the rest not so.You could also record all the samples into one single audio file and then normalise the resulting big audio file before splitting into samples.
-
Sam@Megablastic Sam@Megablastic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=138098
- KVRian
- 509 posts since 30 Jan, 2007 from Uk
You have to remember though that no instrument will ever be at max volume in a mix. I tend to mix each channel in Cubase 4 at -18db to -26db, and I still end up at around -2db on the mnaster fader.
If you record at 24 bit then there is no need to take it to the absolute maximum. A lot of a/d converters work better below -4 to -6 db any way.
If you record at 24 bit then there is no need to take it to the absolute maximum. A lot of a/d converters work better below -4 to -6 db any way.
-
- KVRAF
- 2495 posts since 18 May, 2004 from ATL-USA
I haven't heard that before. Do you have more info or maybe a link?Sam@Megablastic wrote:A lot of a/d converters work better below -4 to -6 db any way.
Anti-aliasing is for "synthmonk%ys".
-
Sam@Megablastic Sam@Megablastic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=138098
- KVRian
- 509 posts since 30 Jan, 2007 from Uk
I don't have the link, but it was a discusion on "gearsluts". It went something like that mid range cards sound better in that level range, and the top end cards like lynx etc can pull off better quality nearer the 0db mark.
But there really is no need to record so high, especially with with intersample overs. Some intersample overs can be as much as 8db, so it's best to play safe. With 24bit (probably 20bit in real world figures) it's safer to record with a good margin below 0db. It's not like the old 12 bit must sample as near to 0db to get all the resolution anymore
24bit has so much head room it's silly 
Also try bring your levels in cubase on each track to -18 to -24 db, not the level fader, keep the level fader on the channel at 0db and lower the actual .wav or vsti at source. Your mixes will thank you for the inter sample overs not giving any plugins you use square waves. It also helps get rid of that "digital sound".
But there really is no need to record so high, especially with with intersample overs. Some intersample overs can be as much as 8db, so it's best to play safe. With 24bit (probably 20bit in real world figures) it's safer to record with a good margin below 0db. It's not like the old 12 bit must sample as near to 0db to get all the resolution anymore
Also try bring your levels in cubase on each track to -18 to -24 db, not the level fader, keep the level fader on the channel at 0db and lower the actual .wav or vsti at source. Your mixes will thank you for the inter sample overs not giving any plugins you use square waves. It also helps get rid of that "digital sound".
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 677 posts since 7 Oct, 2003
So I guess I won't apply any fx on the master channel when sampling. Also, I was thinking that the default velocity should give me the most natural sound when sampling. Maximum velocity can negatively alter the sound.
After researching a bit, I have came to conclusion that I will sample at 16 bit/44100hz since there is basicaly no audible difference with 24bit and file size is much smaller.
I am only talking about single-shot samples here. I think that the "head room" that Sam is referring to is mainly applicable to the entire mix, but not so much when sampling single-shot samples.
After researching a bit, I have came to conclusion that I will sample at 16 bit/44100hz since there is basicaly no audible difference with 24bit and file size is much smaller.
I am only talking about single-shot samples here. I think that the "head room" that Sam is referring to is mainly applicable to the entire mix, but not so much when sampling single-shot samples.
-
- KVRAF
- 13445 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Are you planing to sample various velocity zones? In that case normalizing might be a bad idea.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 677 posts since 7 Oct, 2003
No, just sampling one signle-shot samples with a default velocity.
I have just run some tests sampling at a default velocity and then normalizing peak value but I get lots of noise
Any way to avoid this?
How can the samples sound loud without normalizing them?
I have just run some tests sampling at a default velocity and then normalizing peak value but I get lots of noise
Any way to avoid this?
How can the samples sound loud without normalizing them?
-
JonathanDragonDJ JonathanDragonDJ https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=54723
- KVRian
- 510 posts since 13 Jan, 2005
which normalizing program will you use? i know cubase can do a non-destructive nomralizing...then you can just listen to it...and UNDO if you want to....if you can:t then just make a copy of the samples and normalize that....see how it sounds to you....best way to check! good luck
Cubase4 FLStudio6 Komplete4 Kore PS1 miniTera Atmosphere StylusRMX Hypersonic Plex Xphraze Hydra Junglist PluckedString Scorpion WNadditive ZeroVector VStation Wusikstation3 PSPVintageWarmer CamelSpace Sonitus:FX
