FL Studio 7

[djnice1]

I just bought a NEW pc with Vista 1gb ram and i ran FL 4, 5, 6, and now 7 and all run SLOW on it. REALLY SLOW. Its lagging. After i get a few tracks playing it will start playing slow and hear crackeling niose while its trying to play. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS?????

[Marduchk]

uninstal vista

[reflex]

Check the Interpolation setting in the Audio settings, as well as the selected driver.

Please note that this kind of question should be posted in our Looptalk forum.

[The Unsigned]

I just bought a NEW pc with Vista 1gb ram and i ran FL 4, 5, 6, and now 7 and all run SLOW on it. REALLY SLOW. Its lagging. After i get a few tracks playing it will start playing slow and hear crackeling niose while its trying to play. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS?????

Hehehe, you think that's bad; I have a Quadcore (well 2 dual core AMD Opterons to be precise), 4GB RAM, Vista Ultimate 64 and FL isn't running too well on this machine, ATM I'm blaming it on having no decent graphics card (that's how I make myself feel better). This machine is a real beast though; it's running FL mostly on one core and this core hardly ever hits 100% in CPU intensive projects. I'm using my old PC with XP though, until my soundcard drivers are released. It seems to run better even thought this pc has a quarter of the power of the other. Really strange stuff, but I'm sure I'll sort it out.

Reflex is spot on, as usual; change the interpolation to Linear instead of 6-point hermite. It might work, although it didn't for me...

P3U6!SUn 3H+

[GIGGABYTE]

Hello all,and huha, MSG GIGGAbyte USA RETIRED. HAD FL6 but for some reason it fails to operate correctly now??? Some of my packs are even red?? Help a GRUNT out with an answer. And whats with a, "CRACK", for the new 7 ver.?

[reflex]

Hello all,and huha, MSG GIGGAbyte USA RETIRED. HAD FL6 but for some reason it fails to operate correctly now??? Some of my packs are even red?? Help a GRUNT out with an answer. And whats with a, "CRACK", for the new 7 ver.?

You may want to refrain from asking for cracked software here. Might get you banned.

[GIGGABYTE]

Thanks for the help. I didnt know what it was. I guess its a bad thing.

[Newk]

Few things the clips section needs IMO:

Clip grouping / ungrouping

Much like graphic programs. Select multiple clips, group them and then whichever clip in the group I grab for movement or shift-movement (copying) I move/copy the whole group. When I want to edit contents I can ungroup them, edit and then select and group them again.

Another usefull tool with grouping would be ability to 'squeeze' the group on one lane of the clips playlist stacking all the group elements on the topmost lane (usefull if the user is confident he will not edit the group in near time and wants to preserve screen estate as changing lanes has no effect on anything soundwyse).

Merge for pattern and audioclips

For pattern clips it should be simmiliar to the merge operation for patterns -- one selects multiple pattern clips and clicks merge -- the clips are all merged into one new clip and replaced by that new clip on the playlist respecting their slicing and positions. Additionally, step sequences are sent to piano roll (standard FLS behaviour).

For audioclips it's a matter of creating a new 32-bit wave file and mixing down the original audio clips respecting their slicing, relative volumes and time positions, the resulting wave routed to master.

And finally, the killer feature:

Bouncing clips

By bouncing I mean rendering all selected clips (and disregarding the ones not selected despite being in the same time on the arrangement), of any type, routing through all active effects and executing all selected pattern and automation clips, and then placing the newly rendered wave into proper place in the playlist. Removing original clips should be optional.

The new wave should be routed to master, since the recording point should be the input point of the master chanel. This also removes all isues that such bouncing would cause with sends.

These features would round up the new features form last few versions and finally make Fruity perfect.

i totally agree!

the guys from Image-Line should take this in account
if they want to get even more people into buying their nice DAW

i would like to add that joining/merging of automation clips from the same parameter would be necessary too.. even copying from one to the other is not possible now! a bit of a bummer..

the splitting of clips works still in an oddly way of not REALLY splitting but setting diffrent regions