a poll for step sequencing for tau2
-
- Waaaaahhh
- 2224 posts since 30 Jul, 2001 from montreal, quebec,canada
I personnally would like a small Step-sequencer in Tau2, kinda like Reason's Matrix sequencer
not only for notes, but also for Filter cutoff and rezz and others
Please?...you could turn it off and on as you wish(clikc butoon a step-sequecer appreas..click on it again it disapears..like those keyboards that you can take off ala pro-53 etc)
also keep in mind that midi automation is still limited...with a custom Step-Seq in Tau2 ,it could have MUCH better Filter tweaks bloops and bleep and sweeps
not only for notes, but also for Filter cutoff and rezz and others
Please?...you could turn it off and on as you wish(clikc butoon a step-sequecer appreas..click on it again it disapears..like those keyboards that you can take off ala pro-53 etc)
also keep in mind that midi automation is still limited...with a custom Step-Seq in Tau2 ,it could have MUCH better Filter tweaks bloops and bleep and sweeps
If your plugin is a Synth-edit/synth-maker creation, Say So.
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
-
- KVRian
- 976 posts since 29 Aug, 2001 from Waynesboro, PA
In your opinion, what is it that makes MIDI "still limited" as you put it? Where's the drawback to MIDI programming if all the parameters are accessible via MIDI to begin with?
By the way, the way your poll is currently worded, it is comparing apples to oranges. The two things are not related. "clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks" can still be accomplished using midi and my host's sequencer.
Your poll should have been worded more like this...
Yes I like clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks with a sequencer that is built into a synth.
or
No,I prefer clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks using midi and my Host's sequencer.
Either way, I'd still choose the second option.
By the way, the way your poll is currently worded, it is comparing apples to oranges. The two things are not related. "clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks" can still be accomplished using midi and my host's sequencer.
Your poll should have been worded more like this...
Yes I like clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks with a sequencer that is built into a synth.
or
No,I prefer clicking and having improvised riffs/filter tweaks using midi and my Host's sequencer.
Either way, I'd still choose the second option.
- KVRAF
- 9220 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from Pequot Lakes, MN
I think you're missing realmarco's point-this would be IN ADDITION to your regular automation-a kind of on-demand override.
I think it would be cool,myself...
ew
I think it would be cool,myself...
ew
A spectral heretic...
-
- KVRian
- 976 posts since 29 Aug, 2001 from Waynesboro, PA
I do understand what he is asking. That is why I said what I did about the wording of his poll. The wording of the poll suggests that you can't have clicking and improvised riffs/filter tweaks if you don't have a built-in sequencer. I do like to click & improvise riffs & filter tweaks just as much as the next guy, but I certainly don't need a built-in sequencer to do that.
From a sheer 'ooooh ahhhh, this is fun!' standpoint, I can't really argue against the fun factor. I don't dispute that it would look cool & be fun to use - if not only for nostalgic reasons. From a usefulness standpoint, it really depends on what your sequencer is or isn't capable of. I doubt that any of the hosts offered here at K-v-R are too ill-equiped to handle any of the tweaking he wants to do to begin with.
So, again, I submit that the poll might be worded differently.
Perhaps...
Yes, I think a built-in sequencer would be of use to me.
-or-
No, I don't think a built-in sequencer would be of use to me.
I still want to know his reasoning behind his statements regarding the limitations of MIDI.
From a sheer 'ooooh ahhhh, this is fun!' standpoint, I can't really argue against the fun factor. I don't dispute that it would look cool & be fun to use - if not only for nostalgic reasons. From a usefulness standpoint, it really depends on what your sequencer is or isn't capable of. I doubt that any of the hosts offered here at K-v-R are too ill-equiped to handle any of the tweaking he wants to do to begin with.
So, again, I submit that the poll might be worded differently.
Perhaps...
Yes, I think a built-in sequencer would be of use to me.
-or-
No, I don't think a built-in sequencer would be of use to me.
I still want to know his reasoning behind his statements regarding the limitations of MIDI.
-
Muon Software Ltd Muon Software Ltd https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=89
- KVRian
- 1461 posts since 21 Nov, 2000
Sorry folks, but we need to be clear on this - Tau 2 will not have a step sequencer. The product is almost finished, we're not going to take it to bits now and start again 
There IS however a possibility of a seperate sequencer as an MFX plugin or similar at some point in the future.
Regards
Dave
There IS however a possibility of a seperate sequencer as an MFX plugin or similar at some point in the future.
Regards
Dave
-
- Waaaaahhh
- Topic Starter
- 2224 posts since 30 Jul, 2001 from montreal, quebec,canada
midi rezzz sucks
from 0 to 127...now thats a stepped filters swoop(pun intended)
from 0 to 127...now thats a stepped filters swoop(pun intended)
If your plugin is a Synth-edit/synth-maker creation, Say So.
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
