XHip--Please finish your synth!!
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
ok perfect, for some reason an entry remains in the noteorder list.. i'll try to find where the logical error is..
meanwhile just continue to use 0.6.12.0 since the only difference is with the notelogic's implementation, not the functionality.
meanwhile just continue to use 0.6.12.0 since the only difference is with the notelogic's implementation, not the functionality.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
opps.
http://xhip.cjb.net/xhip/releases/v0/b6 ... 6.12.2.dll
forgot to add "noteorder.remove(note, -1)" on noteoffs.. meaning the notes just got entered more and more into the list never being removed. known as a "memory leak" if the memory is never deallocated.. here it wasnt a memory leak since the system was still working fine.. just not with the intended function.
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/note_entry[note,-1].mp3
it seems to work now (even though the mp3 is in monophonic, i tested polyphonic too!)
http://xhip.cjb.net/xhip/releases/v0/b6 ... 6.12.2.dll
forgot to add "noteorder.remove(note, -1)" on noteoffs.. meaning the notes just got entered more and more into the list never being removed. known as a "memory leak" if the memory is never deallocated.. here it wasnt a memory leak since the system was still working fine.. just not with the intended function.
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/note_entry[note,-1].mp3
it seems to work now (even though the mp3 is in monophonic, i tested polyphonic too!)
-
- KVRAF
- 4669 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from U.A.E
YAY!!!
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
http://xhip.cjb.net/xhip/releases/v0/b6 ... 6.12.3.dll
- fixed issue with 'fingered' monophonic glide mode introduced in last revision
- implemented sustain support for all monophonic and polyphonic modes. switch is fixed to cc[64] (midi sustain) for now - this will be part of the configurable event routing system in the future.
this requires testing to make sure it works, so pull out those pedals and get to it.
fly my pretties, fly! *bwahaha*... *bwahahahaha!*
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/shroom.mp3
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/shroom.adxi
hah, hilarious that it speeds up when i'm using four voices at once (the reverb takes a good chunk of my cpu leaving half as much for xhip) because of the buffer misses. i'll probably be getting a p4 3.6ghz in this week though so that may be the end of my problems with cpu power. i really need to get xhip working faster again though, the cpu use at this point is a bit too much.
- fixed issue with 'fingered' monophonic glide mode introduced in last revision
- implemented sustain support for all monophonic and polyphonic modes. switch is fixed to cc[64] (midi sustain) for now - this will be part of the configurable event routing system in the future.
this requires testing to make sure it works, so pull out those pedals and get to it.
fly my pretties, fly! *bwahaha*... *bwahahahaha!*
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/shroom.mp3
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/shroom.adxi
hah, hilarious that it speeds up when i'm using four voices at once (the reverb takes a good chunk of my cpu leaving half as much for xhip) because of the buffer misses. i'll probably be getting a p4 3.6ghz in this week though so that may be the end of my problems with cpu power. i really need to get xhip working faster again though, the cpu use at this point is a bit too much.
-
- KVRian
- 673 posts since 15 Nov, 2004 from Montevideo, Uruguay
Shit, how did I miss this update? 
Ahhhh, sustain pedal...
Is there any synth that implements something like the sostenuto pedal in piano? That would be cool in some cases.
I was messing with some old patches and found that the newest versions of Xhip have a slightly different behavior regarding some things. I compared the latest version with this OLD one.
For example, these patches have the same settings, but in the latest Xhip every time I hit a note the sound changes a little; the old one is more stable:
test1_0.6.12.3.adxi
test1_old_version.adxi
This one uses ring modulation. The sound is different in each version:
test2_0.6.12.3.adxi
test2_old_version.adxi
Now, probably all these changes are completely normal and not errors/bugs. The problem is: I liked the old ring modulation
, I can't reproduce some nice patches I had in the new version. 
Ahhhh, sustain pedal...
Is there any synth that implements something like the sostenuto pedal in piano? That would be cool in some cases.
I was messing with some old patches and found that the newest versions of Xhip have a slightly different behavior regarding some things. I compared the latest version with this OLD one.
For example, these patches have the same settings, but in the latest Xhip every time I hit a note the sound changes a little; the old one is more stable:
test1_0.6.12.3.adxi
test1_old_version.adxi
This one uses ring modulation. The sound is different in each version:
test2_0.6.12.3.adxi
test2_old_version.adxi
Now, probably all these changes are completely normal and not errors/bugs. The problem is: I liked the old ring modulation
-
- KVRAF
- 6241 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from right here, as you can see ...
wait, lemme store that ...aciddose wrote:i really need to get xhip working faster again though, the cpu use at this point is a bit too much.
i'll nail you on this, bet this!
regards,
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
- KVRAF
- 2910 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from dun unda
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
http://xhip.cjb.net/xhip/releases/v0/b6 ... 6.12.4.dll
- more minor bug fixes with notelogic
- new optimizations, small improvement in speed
- testing an improvement to the filter which compensates for loss of resonance at high frequencies
i'd actually like to know what you think of the change to the filter. this makes it behave a lot more like a standard ota filter like you'd find on the sh- or others. blips are slightly brighter now, and medium-high resonance values give more of that "wet" sound when the cutoff is modulated. personally i like this a lot more, if it wasnt for the small increase in cpu requirements i would love it. i think i'll be able to improve the speed of the synth even more including the speed of this mod to the filter, so if there are no objections it'll stay this way.
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/nonono.mp3
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/hoaver.adxi
- more minor bug fixes with notelogic
- new optimizations, small improvement in speed
- testing an improvement to the filter which compensates for loss of resonance at high frequencies
i'd actually like to know what you think of the change to the filter. this makes it behave a lot more like a standard ota filter like you'd find on the sh- or others. blips are slightly brighter now, and medium-high resonance values give more of that "wet" sound when the cutoff is modulated. personally i like this a lot more, if it wasnt for the small increase in cpu requirements i would love it. i think i'll be able to improve the speed of the synth even more including the speed of this mod to the filter, so if there are no objections it'll stay this way.
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/nonono.mp3
http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/hoaver.adxi
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
gsoto; with the patches..
1) is due to the fact the last revision still didnt have the notelogic working correctly. new notes would always use a new voice in round-robin order, meaning two things. first, it was possible to have more than one voice playing the same note at once, and two since each voice can be in a different state, new versions of the same note on different voices of course sounded different.
2) that was a bug in the ringmod, it works correctly now. i'm not sure exactly what was happening, but it looks like wrapping distortion which is probably really something you do not want. to get the same sounds i'm sure you can manage by using narrow pulses layered over a square.
1) is due to the fact the last revision still didnt have the notelogic working correctly. new notes would always use a new voice in round-robin order, meaning two things. first, it was possible to have more than one voice playing the same note at once, and two since each voice can be in a different state, new versions of the same note on different voices of course sounded different.
2) that was a bug in the ringmod, it works correctly now. i'm not sure exactly what was happening, but it looks like wrapping distortion which is probably really something you do not want. to get the same sounds i'm sure you can manage by using narrow pulses layered over a square.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 3928 posts since 23 Oct, 2005 from vassalboro, maine
wasn't there a no gui version somewhere? this would work with the vstgui wrapper???
happy ham bunny chocolate day btw.....
happy ham bunny chocolate day btw.....
-
- KVRian
- 889 posts since 10 Jul, 2004
aciddose said something about it not being possible.dover666 wrote:wasn't there a no gui version somewhere? this would work with the vstgui wrapper???
happy ham bunny chocolate day btw.....
in theory u dont need a guiless version....the wrapper would strip the existin one.
-
- KVRer
- 22 posts since 8 Apr, 2007 from Zeta1 Reticuli, sometimes on Zeta 2 Reticuli
can this do a supersaw patch sound?

