Soundcard suggestions?
- Beware the Quoth
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
This is just a bit of nosing around for some thoughts, because its not something I need to commit to quite yet, but Im looking for suggestions for a soundcard for a possible installation.
What I need is:
something that can be hooked up to a desktop or laptop
extensive cheapness (i already got an 1820M at home, and its not for recording, so I dont want to spend money on something expensive that'd be redundant after Im done)
4 stereo outputs (driving headphones ultimately, so I need to sort amps for them as well. Anyone know of a £5 headphone amp?)
4 inputs (from probably-shitty mics probably just a step above those plastic computer mics bundled with Sounblasters)
decent XP drivers
Any thoughts?
Ta.
What I need is:
something that can be hooked up to a desktop or laptop
extensive cheapness (i already got an 1820M at home, and its not for recording, so I dont want to spend money on something expensive that'd be redundant after Im done)
4 stereo outputs (driving headphones ultimately, so I need to sort amps for them as well. Anyone know of a £5 headphone amp?)
4 inputs (from probably-shitty mics probably just a step above those plastic computer mics bundled with Sounblasters)
decent XP drivers
Any thoughts?
Ta.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRAF
- 16866 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
My turn-to recommendation wizzard: http://www.recordingreview.com/soundcard
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRian
- 1055 posts since 19 Feb, 2003
Another good recomendation list: http://www.tweakheadz.com/soundcards_fo ... studio.htm
If you want 4 ins/outs, I'd strongly suggest a firewire interface.
If you want 4 ins/outs, I'd strongly suggest a firewire interface.
- KVRAF
- 8144 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
Four TBA820Ms in a box?whyterabbyt wrote:(driving headphones ultimately, so I need to sort amps for them as well. Anyone know of a £5 headphone amp?)
Not being flippant, but four of these (<£1 each) and a handful of components will give you four stereo channels... nice and simple circuit too, easy to slap together on vero board. Assuming you or someone you know can handle some simple soldering...
.g
- KVRAF
- 8144 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
I kinda figured DIY would be the cheapest way to do it. Time might be an issue though, Im up to me eyeballs in stuff and things.GaryG wrote: Four TBA820Ms in a box?
Not being flippant, but four of these (<£1 each) and a handful of components will give you four stereo channels... nice and simple circuit too, easy to slap together on vero board. Assuming you or someone you know can handle some simple soldering...
.g
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Hmmm, found a couple of errors in that already, and it doesnt have any choice on the number of outputs.BertKoor wrote:My turn-to recommendation wizzard: http://www.recordingreview.com/soundcard
Looks like an EMU 1616 might actually be my cheapest bet. Looked at the Behringer ADA8000 for the right number of inputs/outputs, but couldnt find anything with ADAT that still worked out cheaper than the 1616.
The cardbus version of the 1616 and a PCI->cardbus adaptor might be the most flexible way to do it.
Anyone got any other thoughts?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
noone?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- addled muppet weed
- 111327 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
do the ins need to be seperate channels? or could you just use a cheap behringer mixer into one input?
-
Download SOphist Download SOphist https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=95874
- KVRAF
- 4450 posts since 26 Jan, 2006 from :noitacoL
Something between apogee rosetta and soundblaster would be my scope.whyterabbyt wrote:noone?
Emu0404 ? Saffire LE ?
member of the guild of professional dilettantes.
-
- KVRAF
- 13446 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Ok, a few questions:
Would the headphone outs be needed to give everybody an entirely different monitor mix?
Then, would you probably consider a separate, small preamp in addition?
However, some possibilities coming to my mind:
- Stack two M-Audio FW410s (not sure whether stacking os possible, though...). I got mine used for 150 €. It's got two independent HP outs, so 2 units stacked would give you the 4 you need.
- Alternatively, get one FW410 and add a mic preamp with digital outs (you can only use the front mic ins together with the digital ins).
- Get any 4 I/O card and slap a cheapish 4x mic pre and a 4x HP amp in. Probably your most flexible solution.
- Get one of those Helix mixers by Phonic. The PHONIC PHHB18FW features 8 mic ins and 18 audiostreams in total via FW. But, the big disadvantage being that you seem to only get a single stereo stream back from the computer, so your HP monitoring would have to be done via the onboard monitor sends.
- Get the smallest Mackie Onyx. Probably the best quality and easiest handling, besides the fact that you still have to use something else for your monitoring needs.
After all, I think the 2 x FW410 thing would be the most comfortable thing for a decent price, in case they are stackable.
Would the headphone outs be needed to give everybody an entirely different monitor mix?
Then, would you probably consider a separate, small preamp in addition?
However, some possibilities coming to my mind:
- Stack two M-Audio FW410s (not sure whether stacking os possible, though...). I got mine used for 150 €. It's got two independent HP outs, so 2 units stacked would give you the 4 you need.
- Alternatively, get one FW410 and add a mic preamp with digital outs (you can only use the front mic ins together with the digital ins).
- Get any 4 I/O card and slap a cheapish 4x mic pre and a 4x HP amp in. Probably your most flexible solution.
- Get one of those Helix mixers by Phonic. The PHONIC PHHB18FW features 8 mic ins and 18 audiostreams in total via FW. But, the big disadvantage being that you seem to only get a single stereo stream back from the computer, so your HP monitoring would have to be done via the onboard monitor sends.
- Get the smallest Mackie Onyx. Probably the best quality and easiest handling, besides the fact that you still have to use something else for your monitoring needs.
After all, I think the 2 x FW410 thing would be the most comfortable thing for a decent price, in case they are stackable.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Yeah, 4 separate inputs. Although Im not over-worried about the quality.vurt wrote:do the ins need to be seperate channels? or could you just use a cheap behringer mixer into one input?
Effectively (see below)Sascha Franck wrote:Would the headphone outs be needed to give everybody an entirely different monitor mix?
Yeah.Then, would you probably consider a separate, small preamp in addition?
See what I need is to be able to send 4 different mixes of a generated piece to different people listening on headphones. They'll also each be mic'd up, and any sound from them will be recorded and mixed into the piece itself, but not necessarily fed back to them.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 13446 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Ok - so, no matter what you get, I would in any case get a Behringer 4x headphone amp (they're reliable and well laid out, and of course reasonably priced). They have a master in which is shared by the 4 channels (so you can feed something like a "global" backing to everybody) and an additional separate input for each channel.whyterabbyt wrote: See what I need is to be able to send 4 different mixes of a generated piece to different people listening on headphones. They'll also each be mic'd up, and any sound from them will be recorded and mixed into the piece itself, but not necessarily fed back to them.
With this, a whole number of scenarios should be manageable, the easiest being to feed everybody a main mix and then use individual soundcard outputs (most likely fed by sends) to add individual signals to individual phone mixes.
Really, if you manage to get whatever mic-pre with a digital out, the M-Audio would be a great bet - unfortunately it'll be tough to find such a preamp for cheap, as they're usually build to achieve quite some better quality, hence costing a bit more.
But, what about this idea: get whatever 4x4 card (there's a lot, such as the well-reviewed Edirols) and as there's usually just 2 mic ins on the more affordable ones, get something like, say, an M-Audio Audiobuddy in addition (a no fuzz mic/inst preamp throwing out line level).
Oh well, you should better get a card with 6 outs, btw. One main stereo monitor feed and 4 individual mono ones.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35518 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Is that the 'MiniAmp 800'? That's nearly there but I need an independent stereo pair per person. They do do a basic stereo heaphone amp at about half the price of that model, I could just get 4 of them I suppose.Sascha Franck wrote:
Ok - so, no matter what you get, I would in any case get a Behringer 4x headphone amp (they're reliable and well laid out, and of course reasonably priced). They have a master in which is shared by the 4 channels (so you can feed something like a "global" backing to everybody) and an additional separate input for each channel.
Hmmm, that makes sense. In fact, thinking about it if the card has a pair of preamps already, then I can use the Behringer mini-mixer Ive got for the other pair.But, what about this idea: get whatever 4x4 card (there's a lot, such as the well-reviewed Edirols) and as there's usually just 2 mic ins on the more affordable ones, get something like, say, an M-Audio Audiobuddy in addition (a no fuzz mic/inst preamp throwing out line level).
8 outs, Im afraid; needs to be 4 stereo pairs.Oh well, you should better get a card with 6 outs, btw. One main stereo monitor feed and 4 individual mono ones.
The Emu 1616 and the M-Audio 410 are fairly close in price, so either of those would do, I reckon. Pity there isnt something that was just firewire to ADAT I could use with a Behringer ADA8000 for the preamp/output stages.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."