Which reverb can rival/test Waves trueverb??
-
- KVRAF
- 3382 posts since 21 May, 2004 from Deep in the Heartlessness of Texas
Hellbilly -- If you're still interested in the $99 W2-W5 deal, you might check at www.jrrshop.com, since they also offer it, to see if they can give you a better shipping price.
It's an amazing reverb incidentally. I'm incredibly pleased with this particular purchase.
It's an amazing reverb incidentally. I'm incredibly pleased with this particular purchase.
-
afreshcupofjoe afreshcupofjoe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=94815
- KVRAF
- 1838 posts since 17 Jan, 2006 from Portland, OR
I don't get all of this Trueverb bashing. It has some really great sounding early reflections if you keep it low in the mix. I'll often put it in front of a convolution verb to give some nice space around the instrument. I don't know of any other verb that does this quite so well as Trueverb. As long as you don't push it too hard it can sound brilliant. It's not CSR and I definitely wouldn't use t as my go to verb, but it has it's uses. If it's guilty of anything it's that it's way overpriced for what it does. IMO Arts Acoustic is probably the best replacement for it. CSR is really nice, but it has a totally different character that reminds me nothing of Trueverb.
"The Juno 60 was often incorrectly referred to as a synth. It is, in fact, a chorus unit with a synth attached." -PAK
- KVRAF
- 1855 posts since 21 Sep, 2004 from Musician, Recording Engineer, Producer
I keep demo'ing rayspace every time a new version or update comes out because I totally love the concept and theory behind the program. Hovever I find the reverbs that I generate with it to be rather sub par IMHO. I have even noticed fluttering echos in the tails of certain reverbs. It is an awesome concept that I want to love but the sounds just aren't there yet for me. This is of course totally my subjective opinion. Try the demo, you may love it! I myself will be waiting for the next version. Maybe the program needs more ray traces to deliver what I would consider a realistic reveb.pough wrote:What about RaySpace? I haven't tried it, myself, but it claims to be all about the sounds of physical spaces rather than musical effects.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
That's totally been my experience too; cool concept, but can't get it to sound as high-quality as other reverbs.SuperFly76 wrote:I keep demo'ing rayspace every time a new version or update comes out because I totally love the concept and theory behind the program. Hovever I find the reverbs that I generate with it to be rather sub par IMHO. I have even noticed fluttering echos in the tails of certain reverbs. It is an awesome concept that I want to love but the sounds just aren't there yet for me. This is of course totally my subjective opinion. Try the demo, you may love it! I myself will be waiting for the next version. Maybe the program needs more ray traces to deliver what I would consider a realistic reveb.pough wrote:What about RaySpace? I haven't tried it, myself, but it claims to be all about the sounds of physical spaces rather than musical effects.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
I wouldn't say it's a good thing. Ok, for now, in "as is" condition, perhaps yes. But when you update your computer to whatever else (so you may need VST3, a UB or 64bit version or whatever...), you're out of luck as the Wizooverb won't be updated anymore.bduffy wrote:These guys? I thought Wizoo was bought out by M-Audio - oh! Right, M-Audio = Avid.
Well, this is a good side effect of corporate consolidation! (and that means a lot coming from me.)
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Right. I'm glad it's safe to hate monopolies again.Sascha Franck wrote:I wouldn't say it's a good thing. Ok, for now, in "as is" condition, perhaps yes. But when you update your computer to whatever else (so you may need VST3, a UB or 64bit version or whatever...), you're out of luck as the Wizooverb won't be updated anymore.bduffy wrote:These guys? I thought Wizoo was bought out by M-Audio - oh! Right, M-Audio = Avid.
Well, this is a good side effect of corporate consolidation! (and that means a lot coming from me.)
-
- KVRist
- 165 posts since 9 Sep, 2005
RoomVerb for Powercore sounds much better than the native version.AKJ wrote:for an algorithmic reverb spinaudio roomverb m2 seems to be most powerful. the presets are weak but play around with it and you will find it to be excellent.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 3399 posts since 26 Mar, 2002 from london
Can't remember clearly enough but I'm sure it was meant to simulate large spaces too.ttoz wrote:you weren't using it right...for long lush tails for example it was useless, that was never it's intention...chagzuki wrote:I haven't used trueverb for about 5 years so I've no idea how it's developed or whether it's developed at all, but back then it was a load of shit.
it emulates rooms, and does it rather well actually
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.


