KVR Audio

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:37 pm

Thank you!

Yes it pumps nice and I use it to bring up them drums too..

It is 0 latency so it is brutal...

//Daniel

brok landers · Post by **brok landers** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:41 pm

ddummer wrote:

you mean this one?

Sound? meehh... looks nice thou...

//Daniel

yep, right now trying ...

sounds nice from the first hearing (very smooth), though you gave up the brickwall design on thisone?
gui is great (as always), though i'd like to see a readout window/s ...

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:43 pm

There is no point with numbers here.. the engine is 100% program dependant so..

//Daniel

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:44 pm

ddummer wrote:I think I tuned that one by ear or maybe I forgot about higher samplerates...

This one I tried to get equal performance at higher rate but gave up and locked the core to 44.1khz..

//Daniel

what do you mean? I'm sorry I don't quite follow. do you mean the saturated driver or the compressor?

brok landers wrote:brickwall design on thisone?

friggin EVERY time!

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:50 pm

I think I forgot to compensate samplerate on Saturated driver...

This new one I locked the core to 44.1khz but there is a difference in sound in the hi end
anyway..

If you look in an editor the hi end peaks are not as squashed at 192khz compared to 44.1khz...

//Daniel

brok landers · Post by **brok landers** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:52 pm

ddummer wrote:There is no point with numbers here.. the engine is 100% program dependant so..

//Daniel

should've first read the readme, sorry ...

@kingston:
there'll come a time when you understand the conception behind it ...

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:58 pm

brok landers wrote:@kingston:
there'll come a time when you understand the conception behind it ...

I understood it to begin with (and deemed it useless), just not your compulsive obsession on why it should be absolutely everywhere. and don't bother trying to explain it. last time it took you 4 pages and it still made no sense.

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:00 pm

ddummer wrote:If you look in an editor the hi end peaks are not as squashed at 192khz compared to 44.1khz...

//Daniel

thanks. I thought I already heard it, but had to double check.

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:02 pm

And I'm talking about the TLs-2095-LA now.. NOT the saturated driver.

//Daniel

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:03 pm

thought so. all clear.

ouroboros · Post by **ouroboros** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:13 pm

thank you Daniel.
your plugs are beyond my skill, and they make me look good

ermi · Post by **ermi** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:15 pm

http>ftp, so... I like!

Also the TLs-2095-LA is nice.

brok landers · Post by **brok landers** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:24 pm

Kingston wrote:last time it took you 4 pages and it still made no sense.

if you say so, stick with it, why bother learning ...

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:33 pm

NEW PLUG-IN FROM DANIEL!
NEW PLUG-IN FROM DANIEL!
NEW PLUG-IN FROM DANIEL!
NEW PLUG-IN FROM DANIEL!
NEW PLUG-IN FROM DANIEL!

YAY!!! ©Laputa_sync

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:33 pm

brok landers wrote:
Kingston wrote:last time it took you 4 pages and it still made no sense.
if you say so, stick with it, why bother learning ...

what you fail to comprehend (again) is that it's just a technique among others, just a preference. I still HEAVILY disagree with your reasoning behind it (why it apparently should be everywhere), and that it happens in analogue gain staging when it clearly doesn't most of the time.

and even when it does it's actually just simple transformer or fet clipper (ie. waveshaper with possible pre and de-emphasis characteristics). - which this plugin features by the way (just not a brickwall which is a completely digital concept).

TLs-2095-LA Released (updated v1.1)