FR theme: Gimmeback (features from eXT1 missing in XT2)

Official support for: energy-xt.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

also it's good to see Jorgen is in a 909 mood :hihi:

Post

silicon/silicium wrote:also it's good to see Jorgen is in a 909 mood :hihi:
:lol:

yea, nice drum track jorgen

:hihi:

Subz

Post

When selecting the sequencer loop start and end points, in XT1.4 one could simply use the left click to mark the beginning and right click to mark the end.

in XT2 you have to find and drag the left/right markers to their new places, this is bad. if you're zoomed in on a bar and want to loop it, you have to zoom out to find your loop, then drag them to the right position. if it's a long song, you will have to drag to roughly the right position, then zoom in and fix the position.

could we have it 1.4 style? thanks!
FREE MUSIC NO MONEY DOWN
http://joeyhoney.blogspot.com/

Post

has been brought up too many times...

+678.756.345.975

Post

in XT2 you have to find and drag the left/right markers to their new places,
I just left click on the timeline at the point i want the marker to start and drag the duration. Works great.
Or i select the clips that reflect the duration i want to loop and hit "Shift/Enter".
I'm better than you. Deal with it.

Post

We don't like this new way of doing it, FP - it doesn't matter whether you are comfortable with it or not - you are clearly outvoted! :razz:

Post

The "I don't know what the hell's here, but here it is" right click thing that always just popped up was so much better. And recent. And replace.
And the DLLs.
Rakkervoksen

Post

I think there's plans for a recent folder in the browser.


and uh...interesting song in the cafe hovmod. :D
I'm better than you. Deal with it.

Post

Just bringing back something i discussed earlier that was there in XT1 and not anymore in XT2:

Zooming on the play cursor.
[-'/_-O-_\'-]

Post

jens wrote:We don't like this new way of doing it, FP - it doesn't matter whether you are comfortable with it or not - you are clearly outvoted! :razz:
I like the old way too :(, but I keep saying wouldn't it be better for energyXT to detect a drag from a click? Then it wouldn't matter which way you used, both would work!!

Post

druid wrote:
jens wrote:We don't like this new way of doing it, FP - it doesn't matter whether you are comfortable with it or not - you are clearly outvoted! :razz:
I like the old way too :(, but I keep saying wouldn't it be better for energyXT to detect a drag from a click? Then it wouldn't matter which way you used, both would work!!

yes, Jorgen already wrote in another thread, that a combination of both methods would do the trick for him... :)

Post

eeek
i have just been realizing that the slicer is still missing on the sampler... snifff

Post

Multi please.
Why not?

Post

multi and live.

Post

[quote="jens"]jorgen already said (...) that a combination of both methods...quote]

woohoo!! now that's very cool.

...oh... and multi-mode? :oops:
it must be coming eventually.... but i haven't spotted any jorgen comments about it, so i get paranoid.

maybe i missed it, but i would love to see a comment from jorgen specifically about multi-mode. can anyone point me to one?
Last edited by Z3R0T0N1N on Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
resistors are futile you will be simulated
Soundcloud
T4M

Post Reply

Return to “energyXT”