VST Oversampler 1.4 (with SSE/3DNow! support)

[triple p]

Great, and good luck because at the moment i believe his is better. And hopefully it will make him work even harder to make his better.
Let the battle of the oversampler begin.

ppp

[Chris Walton]

Great, and good luck because at the moment i believe his is better. And hopefully it will make him work even harder to make his better.

And the same logic applies here, because that will make me work harder to make mine better

Let the battle of the oversampler begin.

let's go

[laserbeak]

The bottom line is that any dsp fx sound better at higher sampling rates, why do you think that the uad-1 top plugins run at 192khz.

For those that refuse to see the merits of higher sampling rates and would rather theorize than listen to the results..... well, I'd rather use my ears and go with what sounds best

some would also use their brain instead, and understand what this is all about, to avoid oversampling things like echo effects or what's already antialiased by other means.

You will only discredit the real advantage of oversampling with idiotic claims. In this thread you have someone who knows what he's doing, in another thread someone who claims his plugin does magic, sadly you're just food for marketing.

why the f**k do people who claim to be smart always have to disrespectfuly try to put someone down cause they don't agree with the other person????

I CAN HEAR IT TOO!!!
GET A LIFE...

[joshhunsaker]

well
heck, i don't care if i'm retarded or not.

i just think its funny that mr. chopper and metamorphisis or whatever and whoever else won't believe technical evidence or the recordings themselves!!!
HAHA


...i heard the difference in the original audio file.

IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE PLUG DON'T USE IT. IF YOU ARE PRESBYTERIAN DON'T GO TO A CATHOLIC CHURCH. THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE SIGNS ON THE FRONT OF THE CHURCH - SO PEOPLE DON'T GO TO WRONG PLACE.

Please. Everyone, continue to enjoy 44.1 khz for eternity. We will all be happy to live in the present.

[laserbeak]

LOL

[Funkybot's Evil Twin]

This is a cool idea, but I always wondered: why don't the hosts themselves do this on render? Sure it would change the sound of your mix (should be an improvement if anything), but it would be great as an option.

[Sam@Megablastic]

The bottom line is that any dsp fx sound better at higher sampling rates, why do you think that the uad-1 top plugins run at 192khz.

For those that refuse to see the merits of higher sampling rates and would rather theorize than listen to the results..... well, I'd rather use my ears and go with what sounds best

some would also use their brain instead, and understand what this is all about, to avoid oversampling things like echo effects or what's already antialiased by other means.

You will only discredit the real advantage of oversampling with idiotic claims. In this thread you have someone who knows what he's doing, in another thread someone who claims his plugin does magic, sadly you're just food for marketing.

Well you can be as rude as you like , and also try to maybe second guess my professionalism/ability in the audio engineering by saying my claims are idiotic, but I stand by my hearing...knowing that running many plugins at higher sample rates simply sounds better. No voodoo, no smoke or mirrors ...it just sounds better.

By the way, which part of my post was idiotic exactly? I think the Uad-1 programmers know a thing or two about the merits of upsampling to say 192khz then downsampling to 44khz. I'm sure they thought posssibly of the pro's and cons.

Of course upsampling and echo unit would be pretty pointless, but reverbs, eq's (especially) and compressors...not forgetting most synths all benefit a lot from running a project at say 96khz. If you really can't hear the difference then...I don't know...it's pretty damn clear to me. To be able to keep most of the project at 44khz and run some of the money fx/vsti's at higher sample rates is a pretty cool thing in my book.

[laserbeak]

i think one person mentioned that it isn't always compatible with all plugins.
would be cool if the next version of the VST standard fixed this

[Chris Walton]

This is a cool idea, but I always wondered: why don't the hosts themselves do this on render? Sure it would change the sound of your mix (should be an improvement if anything), but it would be great as an option.

Actually, I'd prefer if hosts didn't do something differently on render.

Instead, I wouldn't mind if hosts had an "oversample this plugin" option directly built in.

[laserbeak]

better idea

[jupiter8]

i just think its funny that mr. chopper and metamorphisis or whatever and whoever else won't believe technical evidence or the recordings themselves!!!
HAHA

I think it's funny that you don't know who mr. chopper is and think he speaks out of his ass. He does'nt unlike some....

[nuffink]

why the f**k do people who claim to be smart always have to disrespectfuly try to put someone down cause they don't agree with the other person????

Possibly because they know what they're talking about? You know, the kind of people who get out there and actually write the tools that you do nothing other than ignorantly bitch about.

Just a thought.

[joshhunsaker]

oh and mr. choppy + meta. I'm sure you are actually very cool and informed people. in fact - I am sorry that I may have called you a name initially...
...but if you can't hear the difference on your monitors then you truly have some form of hearing loss. Have you considered getting it checked?

[laserbeak]

aint he an FL guy?
FL is my fav sequencer by far, but disrespect is disrespect.
and i CAN hear the diff

[joshhunsaker]

Possibly because they know what they're talking about? You know, the kind of people who get out there and actually write the tools that you do nothing other than ignorantly bitch about.

I thought the person who wrote the program in question was the one getting flamed... maybe you should check the op.