KVR Audio

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:01 pm

brok landers wrote:
nuffink wrote:
brok landers wrote:btw, make a screenshot of it with a menue dropped down (if there is a dropdown menue) ... then i tell you ...
You won't because I use Dave Haupt's pop-up controls not the SE defaults.
ok, then thisone is one of the rare exeptions i was talking about ... plus, as you say yourself, it's not standard se, but packed with custom code by dave ...

So what you meant was all SE plugs look and feel the same except for those that are designed to look and feel different, which is somehow cheating.

ok

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:02 pm

DrNo wrote: (Just imagine, Nuffy if you hadda coded Chordspace Playa Playa Boy... in GOMPy script..... you'd have had none of this b/s and also the Mac market.... O well, live and learn, ay? hehe)

and a UI that looked like Babyasoft stole it from Wordstar.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:03 pm

DrNo wrote:@Nuff:

I'm glad to see you are intelligent enough to (finally) understand my humour

(and it was $400 squid... get it right Gov )

Not too many takers then? NI and Yamaha mysteriously not beating a path to your door.

I'm surprised.

diverdee · Post by **diverdee** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:08 pm

nuffink wrote:
brok landers wrote:
nuffink wrote:
brok landers wrote:btw, make a screenshot of it with a menue dropped down (if there is a dropdown menue) ... then i tell you ...
You won't because I use Dave Haupt's pop-up controls not the SE defaults.
ok, then thisone is one of the rare exeptions i was talking about ... plus, as you say yourself, it's not standard se, but packed with custom code by dave ...
So what you meant was all SE plugs look and feel the same except for those that are designed to look and feel different, which is somehow cheating.

ok

The custom code that Dave Haupt & others create to (how should I put this) overcome SE's limitations / expand SE's capabilities - are these snippets of code themselves programmed using SE, or are they pieces of clever C++ etc. that are integrated into SE?
Just wondering, because if the second option (C++) that seems to indicate (functionally) that the 'better' SE built synths actually have to go beyond SE itself, to overcome it's limitations etc.
So the argument that 'SE built synths etc. are just as good as C++ built ones' seems a little redundant in that case, as in order to approach the level of custom coded (C++ etc.) synths & effects the SE ones have to (in effect) be at least partially custom coded themselves.
Strange argument.

DrNo · Post by **DrNo** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:09 pm

C'mon admit it boys, both you (Nuff) and FGR would have LOVED to have been part of GOMPy from Day 1

The arrogant Aussie didn't invite ya to the party..... Plz forgive me....

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:13 pm

diverdee wrote:The custom code that Dave Haupt & others create to (how should I put this) overcome SE's limitations / expand SE's capabilities - are these snippets of code themselves programmed using SE, or are they pieces of clever C++ etc. that are integrated into SE?
Just wondering, because if the second option (C++) that seems to indicate (functionally) that the 'better' SE built synths actually have to go beyond SE itself, to overcome it's limitations etc.
So the argument that 'SE built synths etc. are just as good as C++ built ones' seems a little redundant in that case, as in order to approach the level of custom coded (C++ etc.) synths & effects the SE ones have to (in effect) be at least partially custom coded themselves.
Strange argument.

They're coded in C++. SE has an API for this. And yeah they are designed to overcome SE's limitations. That's how programming works, you extend and improve the basic framework.

Weird argument.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:15 pm

DrNo wrote:C'mon admit it boys, both you (Nuff) and FGR would have LOVED to have been part of GOMPy from Day 1

The arrogant Aussie didn't invite ya to the party..... Plz forgive me....

Absolutely.

I was just commenting the other day how much I'd love be associated with software so bad you couldn't give it away.

stefancrs · Post by **stefancrs** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:17 pm

Poor Bootsie

DrNo · Post by **DrNo** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:17 pm

hmmm... how are Chordspace sales?

DrNo · Post by **DrNo** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:17 pm

stefancrs wrote:Poor Bootsie

He's gettin' free ads, don't pity him

stefancrs · Post by **stefancrs** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:18 pm

DrNo wrote:
stefancrs wrote:Poor Bootsie
He's gettin' free ads, don't pity him

He's also getting a thread that isn't about what he wanted it to be at all!

FWIW, I thought that OP GUI looked great!

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:20 pm

DrNo wrote:hmmm... how are Chordspace sales?

Reasonable. The rave reviews in SOS, Computer Music and Future Music helped.

Not going so well for yourself I see...

daFailure wrote: On a serious note....

I'll sell ya GuruOne.biz for $400 squid

eduardo_b · Post by **eduardo_b** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:21 pm

stefancrs wrote:
DrNo wrote:
stefancrs wrote:Poor Bootsie
He's gettin' free ads, don't pity him
He's also getting a thread that isn't about what he wanted it to be at all!

FWIW, I thought that OP GUI looked great!

Yes, the gui looks great. We don't know what it's for, but it is nice.

DrNo · Post by **DrNo** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:21 pm

Define "reasonable"?

Covers yer food/rent/bills then?

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:22 pm

DrNo wrote:Define "reasonable"?

Not trying to flog the company for $400

Update 1.2.1: Rescue, now includes Rescue Anniversary Edtion