KVR Audio

egbert · Post by **egbert** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:56 am

bmanic wrote:It's time to bump this before bedtime, so, BUMP!!!!

Yep - we haven't hyped this nearly enough!

I guess its only natural that the usual compressor vultures are circling overhead ...

Integratron · Post by **Integratron** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:03 am

Cordelia wrote:
Integratron wrote:
Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:
Integratron wrote:I've downed it - it's freekin' awsome! Here: http://www.tinbrooketales.com/archive/archive.htm
That's just mean.
What
It hasn't been released. We're all waiting impatiently while still trying to look cool. He thought you were teasing us on purpose.

So sorry - I got my 2095 confused with the 2094. The 2095 is freekin' killer! I can't wait to hear the 2094!

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:37 am

Ah, I thought you were just having a go at us. Anyway, yes, the 2095 is also excellent (I'm also a big Pocket Limiter fan). In fact, I think the quality of the 2095 is making the wait of the 2094 all the more difficult. You know it's just going to be good.

koolkeys · Post by **koolkeys** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:52 am

Ya know, if I was ddummer, I would play around with us a bit and release a version that doesn't do ANYTHING with the sound. Then we'd all try it and due to placebo effect we wouldn't even realize it and we'd be praising it all over the internet!

Brent

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:54 am

Oh man...somebody TOTALLY has to do that sometime...

egbert · Post by **egbert** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:25 am

It has been done in the hardware domain - there was a firm who marketed all kinds of nice rack mount front panels for "signal processing" gizmos that did nothing to the signal whatever.

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:46 am

egbert wrote:It has been done in the hardware domain - there was a firm who marketed all kinds of nice rack mount front panels for "signal processing" gizmos that did nothing to the signal whatever.

Wasn't the idea of those to fill up empty rack-spaces though?

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:01 am

Link! Link!

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:49 am

jens · Post by **jens** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:15 am

koolkeys wrote:Ya know, if I was ddummer, I would play around with us a bit and release a version that doesn't do ANYTHING with the sound. Then we'd all try it and due to placebo effect we wouldn't even realize it and we'd be praising it all over the internet!

Brent

Wouls that really work with you?

koolkeys · Post by **koolkeys** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:22 am

jens wrote:
koolkeys wrote:Ya know, if I was ddummer, I would play around with us a bit and release a version that doesn't do ANYTHING with the sound. Then we'd all try it and due to placebo effect we wouldn't even realize it and we'd be praising it all over the internet!

Brent

Wouls that really work with you?

It was a joke. How many plugins that LOOK cool get released around here that aren't actually as good as people say they are? I mean, some people actually believe that the Antress plugins SOUND like the effects they are trying to look like.

So I just thought it would be funny to see what happens. You just KNOW that some people would probably say it sounded great.

Brent

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:30 am

The GUI is getting there....

//Daniel

krank · Post by **krank** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:34 am

Why not put the ratio control in the middle instead?

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:55 am

... because it's all about the attack.

Pressure and limit are connected to the attack parameter.

//Daniel

Waker · Post by **Waker** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:01 pm

Can't wait

TLs-2095-LA Released (updated v1.1)