I can see that. Nice place to stop shopping around and make music imo. Good for you. Despite the things I don't like about Reaper every time I take the time to try and do music, I get something I want to keep. I can't figure out how I can think something is so uninspiring and be so productive.koolkeys wrote:Yes, I'm still using T3, but I also use Sonar quite a lot since I got it. Sonar does all the heavy lifting for me and Tracktion is my scratchpad app.tomg wrote:Are you still using T2-3? Still happy? Just curious..koolkeys wrote:I agree that adding effects is a bit easier now. However, I don't like the new mixer stuff at all really. Better than before, but just not what I would prefer.
Brent
I use both and can't imagine what I'll ever need that they can't do. Tracktion lets me be a musician, and Sonar lets me be an engineer. Great stuff really, and both are as stable as anything has ever been for me, and also more stable than Reaper has been for me, since we're talking about it.
Brent
So... Why aren't you using Reaper?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
Last edited by tomg on Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
According to our little poll you have a point. 23% of the votes so far are from happy Reaper users. Considering it's fairly new that's not that bad.Radek wrote:Which software were ever "out of beta" really? And how Reaper is the crap???masukie wrote:REAPER has to much "update". It is for a short time on business but tons of version numbers. For me REAPER is still beta status. The code is messed up all time. I won't pay one dollar for the crap.
Reaper has its own GUI "style" and workflow just like any other unique program. It doesn't have to be liked by everyone but its value can not be disputed. I don't understand why assume it's not popular either. Cockos functions and it means it has customers. People are too binary sometimes assuming it must be all or nothing proposition all the time.
-
- Banned
- 1841 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
Im happy whith Tracktion and I don't realy have any real time for any other. But, I still keep an eye on Reaper, very fast developement and seems to have a very good audio engine. 
-
- KVRist
- 82 posts since 28 Mar, 2007 from Coventry, UK
What I find a bit annoying is the non-commerical vs. commercial license thing.
Everyone goes on about how good value it is as if it were a $50 product, but its really $200 for the commercial license that is equivalent to its peers (Do any other DAWs have seperate non-commercial licenses?). Which makes it twice as expensive as a basic version of Tracktion, for example.
On the other hand, I wish more companies did this, so I'm really just annoyed that this strategy isn't done by everyone else
Ben
Everyone goes on about how good value it is as if it were a $50 product, but its really $200 for the commercial license that is equivalent to its peers (Do any other DAWs have seperate non-commercial licenses?). Which makes it twice as expensive as a basic version of Tracktion, for example.
On the other hand, I wish more companies did this, so I'm really just annoyed that this strategy isn't done by everyone else
Ben
- KVRAF
- 5268 posts since 16 May, 2002 from Brisbane , Australia
Ooo, that's pretty.GermanFafian wrote:I'm happy using FL and Reaper, but don't have much free time for music making anymore![]()
![]()
At least right now I work making things I like
I use Reaper mostly as a sketchpad. Great to get multi tracked ideas down quickly, but I find I get a much smaller plugin count that I can get with Tracktion. So apart from familarity and contentment with Tracktion, it is cpu use that is an issue. Strange because a lot of people seem to say it is light in cpu use.
Intel Core i7 8700K, 16gb, Windows 10 Pro, Focusrite Scarlet 6i6
-
- KVRAF
- 3627 posts since 5 Jan, 2006 from UK
I'm glad that neither the fans nor the company as a whole have been selected as options yet.
Justin certainly didn't deserve to lose business due to a nasty but vocal minority.
-
- KVRist
- 210 posts since 20 Oct, 2003
The reason I don't use it is that it keeps causing blue screens of death on my system... usually within a few seconds after starting it. When I contacted support they basically just told me to f*** off. So there.
-
- KVRAF
- 2685 posts since 14 Jul, 2005 from Australia
You know what ... I haven't played much with elastique, you're right, it is very nice! I guess this point is no longer valid since elastique was introduced.sonicfire wrote:um what?? the timestretching algos in reaper are at least 5 times better and faster than in cubasesoundpalace wrote: - No high quality time stretching (e.g. MPEX, Radius)
Cheers
Fots
Last edited by fgimian on Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 3928 posts since 23 Oct, 2005 from vassalboro, maine
is it when you go to the media explorer, i think the versions from like may through late fall were crashing my intel board, and now, i don't know if it's actually fixed because i've got a new amd system, and it hasn't crashed yet. (with anything) -MotorMind wrote:The reason I don't use it is that it keeps causing blue screens of death on my system... usually within a few seconds after starting it. When I contacted support they basically just told me to f*** off. So there.
-
- KVRist
- 297 posts since 15 Jun, 2007
Reaper has been really stable for me...
But I agree with some - it's uninspiring... and I dont like the way the midi is set out.. I dont know why.. but I just dont. After I recently purchased Reason - I still use reaper for audio recording... but I feel reason dose the midi editing just that much better!
When I get a mac next year.. i'll prolly move to logic.
Vinay
But I agree with some - it's uninspiring... and I dont like the way the midi is set out.. I dont know why.. but I just dont. After I recently purchased Reason - I still use reaper for audio recording... but I feel reason dose the midi editing just that much better!
When I get a mac next year.. i'll prolly move to logic.
Vinay
-
- KVRist
- 133 posts since 9 Apr, 2004
Even as Reaper improves, I find myself stumbling on the fact that nearly every little task is accomplished differently than in Cubase , which is what I am used to (and also markedly different from other apps I'm semi-familiar with). I suppose at some point I will give it a serious try and have to learn it. Adding good Audio Warp/Beat Detective-like functionality will be a possible tipping point for me.
I do remember not liking the way track folders are implemented at all. I do like the free routing - reminds me a bit of Pro Tools there. MIDI editing was much-improved last I checked.
fizbin
I do remember not liking the way track folders are implemented at all. I do like the free routing - reminds me a bit of Pro Tools there. MIDI editing was much-improved last I checked.
fizbin
-
- KVRAF
- 2249 posts since 6 May, 2003 from rat city au
The MIDI editor blows
My current stuff works just fine
It coughs and splutters too much running 32f wavs
It looks like puke
oh, and the fans shit me
.. but I
Winamp
/sk
My current stuff works just fine
It coughs and splutters too much running 32f wavs
It looks like puke
oh, and the fans shit me
.. but I
/sk
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 5267 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
And Energy XT2ttoz wrote:it's a vsti, the uberschall ones use itfandango wrote:Out of curiousity, which is the other one?ttoz wrote: I agree with everything in your post except the timestretching quality is quite superb now and reaper is one of only 2 apps ont he market using elastique pro..
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]

