Well but not actually, I feel i understand a little more than before this thread.
off key notes?
-
offensive-teenager offensive-teenager https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159180
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 102 posts since 4 Sep, 2007
Lol this thread went to something that once happened in my university. A confused student asked a prossor asked for an opinion for a thing that was puzzling his mind, from a professor. The professor started to to explain that thing to confused student, but an another professor heard the explanation and said it was wrong. Then the professors started arguing and fighting over that question and leaving the student without answer and even more confused?
Well but not actually, I feel i understand a little more than before this thread.
Well but not actually, I feel i understand a little more than before this thread.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
escuse pliz;blaster78 wrote:eh.... that is one of the most ridiculous statements i have ever seenjcivil wrote:{and who cares anymore, it's a dead practice and has been for a long long time}
18th century practice period done went and died (21st century now I think), unless of course you are the very one to revive the age by sheer dint of your talent
good luck!
Last edited by jancivil on Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
fine. not clear from your language. you do appear to make argumentative points to prove you know more than I do, and it's clear ya do not.Toxikator wrote:I'm honestly not trying to make you look like an idiot. I'm just saying that if a piece doesn't stick to one key (barring PERHAPS the occasional chromatic note from a tonicization) then it shouldn't be called "Diatonic".
using a flat 2 changes the key? it does not, unless there has been a convincing cadence in the new key.
even your wiki citation agrees with me... there's some debate, according to the article, over whether or not a piece that uses the #7 or #6 in the minor is technically "diatonic", but there doesn't seem to be any debate that if a piece uses a b2 (not present in any major or minor no matter how you cut it) it's chromatic (as opposed to diatonic)...? or did I miss something in there?
criminy.
I know, you just included it to show off your advanced knowledgeAs to the initial post re: Neapolitans, please excuse that. That was before I saw the score, I was just counting off potential explanations for a bii scale degree... Neapolitan being one of them (tritone substitution being the other).
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from UK
This has been interesting so far -- please let's keep it civil. 
Sound design, audio editing, and instrument programming for UVI Workstation and Falcon/MachFive
http://www.iainmorland.net
http://www.iainmorland.net
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
I tried to clarify some purdy muddy waters, mom
got characterized repeatedly as not knowing my stuff for my efforts, and been cited very inaccurately in a strictly from argumentative tone, add to that the confuse and obfuscate maneuvers... and now I have said the most ridiculous thing someone has ever seen?
[18th c practice period is OVER peoples!]
and never ever said anything uncivil, at any point.
my possibly accurate characterization of the motivation strictly to look smart isn't the most delicate move I could've made, but when you won't let it alone, and: HEY, 'I'm not trying to make you look like an idiot' went there first, and I wouldn't use IDIOT to anyone in an argument, even by innuendo
on top of that, I believe I DID manage to clarify some wholly inaccurate points, and set right some context which was lacking
which unfortunately probably did not help the original poster, who, hey, might've become bored with all this. right, it is tedious.
doesn't mean I'm not going to hold my own here.
got characterized repeatedly as not knowing my stuff for my efforts, and been cited very inaccurately in a strictly from argumentative tone, add to that the confuse and obfuscate maneuvers... and now I have said the most ridiculous thing someone has ever seen?
[18th c practice period is OVER peoples!]
and never ever said anything uncivil, at any point.
my possibly accurate characterization of the motivation strictly to look smart isn't the most delicate move I could've made, but when you won't let it alone, and: HEY, 'I'm not trying to make you look like an idiot' went there first, and I wouldn't use IDIOT to anyone in an argument, even by innuendo
on top of that, I believe I DID manage to clarify some wholly inaccurate points, and set right some context which was lacking
which unfortunately probably did not help the original poster, who, hey, might've become bored with all this. right, it is tedious.
doesn't mean I'm not going to hold my own here.
-
- KVRAF
- 6937 posts since 4 Jun, 2004 from Utrecht, Holland
Probably the A# should be called a Bb.
I've listened to the clip, and there's nothing dissonant in the C B Bb (or A#) A sequence.
I've listened to the clip, and there's nothing dissonant in the C B Bb (or A#) A sequence.
My MusicCalc is temporary offline.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
I can easily pick out the A#'s in question. They did immediately stand out, but not in a bad way at all. It was more like "Oh, he's doing something interesting there, intentionally diverging from the tried and true trance formula. Good for him!"
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.
-
- KVRAF
- 3125 posts since 6 Dec, 2002 from Ljubljana/ Slovenia
hmm,
an easy explanation would be:
- the piece is basically in a minor but since there's no strict chord or a bass note present, the passing Bb functions as a dominant to A (tritone substitution, Bb in place of E7).
- a lot of eastern music alternates between 9th and b9 on a minor chord
- since a melody has no underlying bass there's no b9 actually. It's true b9 is only allowed on seventh chords and some other special cases but - no bass - no interval - as it's the interval that's dissonant.
k
an easy explanation would be:
- the piece is basically in a minor but since there's no strict chord or a bass note present, the passing Bb functions as a dominant to A (tritone substitution, Bb in place of E7).
- a lot of eastern music alternates between 9th and b9 on a minor chord
- since a melody has no underlying bass there's no b9 actually. It's true b9 is only allowed on seventh chords and some other special cases but - no bass - no interval - as it's the interval that's dissonant.
k
-
- KVRAF
- 3125 posts since 6 Dec, 2002 from Ljubljana/ Slovenia
uhm, that's what I meantVaradin wrote:Yes. And generally, b9 tension is "allowed" only on dominant seventh chords...
k
-
- KVRist
- 228 posts since 18 Dec, 2007 from Evanston, IL.
In the context of the short clip provided, I think the a# just doesn't fit, and doesn't seem to have a clear purpose. However, I think that if the music is developed further, the idea of a# can be given more purpose and integrated with the whole composition. I think that the arpeggiated sound doesn't lend itself well to non diatonic tones, as they suggest melody, and chromatic melody at that, while arpeggios are harmonic, and more static.
My 2.1 cents.
Mike
My 2.1 cents.
Mike