FR theme: Rendering
-
- KVRAF
- 10366 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
- do you mean rendering an individual clip - including Fx, Mixer channel etc?
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
am i the only one that finds render to track a bit quiet?DarkStar wrote:Render to new track
To use the temporary audio folder if a project-specific audio folder has not been created.
[same for Freeze]
i know its supposed to bypass FX? (i think?) but i find it quiet even with no fx or gain,
Subz
-
- KVRist
- 256 posts since 1 Nov, 2005
well said.jens wrote:jens wrote:not my intention at all - a language barrier then I think...engine wrote:not negative but rude.jens wrote:Dang - I always sound so negative - should I feel bad?
I just want to add that it's really difficult for me to walk the thin line between sounding impolite and not making clear how important I consider something. Most of what I wrote concearing rendering here in this thread now I already mentioned numerous times before - but things tend to get lost so easily - so when I consider something to be really important (for XT2's success as well as for our comfort) I start my typical rant threads about it in the hope that people back me up so while Jorgen might not feel too charmed by it he gets important info from it. It's so easy to overlook the important stuff in the flood of feature-requests (that's the main reason why I'm not too much a friend of public beta-testing - 'Zu viele Köche verderben den Brei' as a German proverb says ('too many cooks spoil the meal'))
btw: good points
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25007 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
*bump*
had to render something today because of the crappy audio-bug that still isn't fixed (the one where the sample-playback continues even though the part has ended) and it was just CRAP (had a huge gain-loss b.t.w. I just couldn't get rid off).
Jorgen, please either get the audio-stuff sorted or just be straight about it and remove audio-tracks altogether for the time being.
had to render something today because of the crappy audio-bug that still isn't fixed (the one where the sample-playback continues even though the part has ended) and it was just CRAP (had a huge gain-loss b.t.w. I just couldn't get rid off).
Jorgen, please either get the audio-stuff sorted or just be straight about it and remove audio-tracks altogether for the time being.
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
I'll kick your ass if he dose remove them!!!jens wrote: Jorgen, please either get the audio-stuff sorted or just be straight about it and remove audio-tracks altogether for the time being.
who would have thought record Automation would take Sooooo long to implement,
Subz
-
- KVRist
- 486 posts since 6 Apr, 2004
I thought it would take a time,djsubject wrote:who would have thought record Automation would take Sooooo long to implement
but my guess is also that the 'Coming next' will become a little bit longer than it actually is immediatly before the next beta gets uploaded...
Jorgen is always good for such little surprises (be it intentionally or because of - ahem, pardon me - er ...other reasons)
Yearning for a new beta today much more than the last times...
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25007 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
djsubject wrote:I'll kick your ass if he dose remove them!!!jens wrote: Jorgen, please either get the audio-stuff sorted or just be straight about it and remove audio-tracks altogether for the time being.
The problem is:
it just ain't working - I barely find my way through the debris of bugs and misconceptions so what's a noob gonna do?
-
- KVRAF
- 1811 posts since 18 Jan, 2005 from Lost in the blinding whiteness of the tundra
*bump*
I've been rendering more stuff lately and getting mildly annoyed by a few things. Two of them have already been mentioned and are workflow issues, one hasn't and doesn't really have a practical workaround.
* Render to wav and render to new audio track really belong behind the same button, along with render to existing audio track.
* Render selected parts would be really nice.
* An option to allow for reverb / delay tails would be rather good. At the moment it's practically impossible to render a lot of little sections if they have echoes in without having to move all the other parts around every time.
As someone said upthread, an option to render so that individual drum / midi / audio clips go to individual (possibly overlapping) audio clips, or the current (output) audio clip ends and the next one begins every time a new drum / midi / audio clip begins would be amazing, (as would a quick-freeze option that only freezes the selected parts and leaves the rest of the track silent, so you don't have to freeze and unfreeze entire six minute tracks if you're working on an 8 bar loop) but that's drifting into coffee maker territory.
I've been rendering more stuff lately and getting mildly annoyed by a few things. Two of them have already been mentioned and are workflow issues, one hasn't and doesn't really have a practical workaround.
* Render to wav and render to new audio track really belong behind the same button, along with render to existing audio track.
* Render selected parts would be really nice.
* An option to allow for reverb / delay tails would be rather good. At the moment it's practically impossible to render a lot of little sections if they have echoes in without having to move all the other parts around every time.
As someone said upthread, an option to render so that individual drum / midi / audio clips go to individual (possibly overlapping) audio clips, or the current (output) audio clip ends and the next one begins every time a new drum / midi / audio clip begins would be amazing, (as would a quick-freeze option that only freezes the selected parts and leaves the rest of the track silent, so you don't have to freeze and unfreeze entire six minute tracks if you're working on an 8 bar loop) but that's drifting into coffee maker territory.
It's a rave, Lewis!
-
- KVRAF
- 2545 posts since 22 Jun, 2004 from Paris. Well, not far.
errrr.... sorry but... how do I render a midi track to a new audio track and how do I render a midi part to a new audio track? Can I?
Sorry I'm trying out XT2 again and so have missed most of the recent improvements...
d
Sorry I'm trying out XT2 again and so have missed most of the recent improvements...
d
-
- KVRist
- 486 posts since 6 Apr, 2004
Yes, you can.dacaumodo wrote:errrr.... sorry but... how do I render a midi track to a new audio track and how do I render a midi part to a new audio track? Can I?
Sorry I'm trying out XT2 again and so have missed most of the recent improvements...
d
1) Solo the track that you want to render as a whole or a part of it.
2) Select all parts or the one part that you want to render in this track.
3) Press 'Shift+Enter' to let XT2 set the loop locators to include all selected parts. (It will automatically start playing, but just press 'Space' then to stop the sequencer)
4) Press 'Ctrl+B' to call 'Bounce to audio track' (also available via main-menu on the top under 'Sequence')
5) Check the settings and press Start.
Here you go,
Patrik
-
- KVRAF
- 2545 posts since 22 Jun, 2004 from Paris. Well, not far.
Thanks Patrik. Is it me or... was it easier in eXT 1.4? 
BTW this technique uncovered a bug: I opened the bounce panel and then closed it without starting the bounce, XT2 still created a new audio track, with an empty audio part.
BTW this technique uncovered a bug: I opened the bounce panel and then closed it without starting the bounce, XT2 still created a new audio track, with an empty audio part.
-
- KVRAF
- 2237 posts since 12 Nov, 2002 from swordfish
it was partially fixed. it used to also leave an empty wav file on disk... now it just leaves a track and an empty audio part, but it deletes the file from disk.
wrongtastic, baby
tucson's number one gothic rock band since 1995
tucson's number one gothic rock band since 1995
-
- KVRAF
- 2545 posts since 22 Jun, 2004 from Paris. Well, not far.
Well here it happens with 2.07 too. The audio part created is empty though.kirtap910 wrote:Could it be that with 2.07 final it is totally fixed?
I cannot reproduce it here anymore.