fixed that for you. i didnt use the phrase 'lots of study', or anything that means the same as 'lots of study'.aciddose wrote:where in any of those quotes you've got did i say "circuit bending is absolutely useless without formal knowledge"
but here are some quotes where you claim that circuit bending is useless without 'basic rules', or 'basic knowledge of electronics, which falls under several acceptable interpretations of 'formal knowledge'.
please feel to provide a definition of 'formal' which absolutely refutes that as an accurate usage. of course, i can find half a dozen appropriate definitions that support it, so that still wouldn't change much.
now that we've correctly defined "circuit bending", we can go on to say that it will require at least a basic knowledge of electronics
once again: you cant go anywhere with "circuit bending" without having some basic knowledge of electronics.
again: you can not get anywhere in circuit bending without knowing some additional basic rules.
i honestly do not care about circuit bending! i only said you cant go anywhere with it's methods.