I'm terrible at vocoders
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
Most robot voices by daft punk are talk boxes.
I think the reason vocoders like orange and the microkorg one are considered good is because they are so simple, in the sense that they leave little room for people to f**k with things they should leave put for a basic pristine sound. The imageline vocoder is fantastic - you just have to really take the guesswork out of all its bandwidth and filter parameters.
The microkorg's vocoder is actually a very basic digital vocoder.Wavedude wrote:The MicroKorg Makes a perfect classic vocoder. Because its real. The virtual computer VST vocoders are really just basic. The MicroKorgs Vocoder is very analogish and it can be very cheap for the price. And if you want something better don't stop there, there are tons of other analog vocoders. The more expencive ones might be way better.
But remember, just experiment with sounds and waves, you will find that perfect sound.
I think the reason vocoders like orange and the microkorg one are considered good is because they are so simple, in the sense that they leave little room for people to f**k with things they should leave put for a basic pristine sound. The imageline vocoder is fantastic - you just have to really take the guesswork out of all its bandwidth and filter parameters.
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
You also have to keep in mind that most "classic", "vintage" analog vocoders only had 8 filter bands, or 16 at most. In contrast, your average VST vocoder uses 512-1024 bands of FFT analysis. I'm not suggesting that one is better than the other, but the approach is substantially different.
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.
