KVR Audio

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Wed May 28, 2008 6:13 pm

vieris wrote:Update.
Added
SAT-1 - Saturation Enhancer

Key Features.

- Tape/Tube Models

hm, so one single crappy 5th order waveshaper is a tape + tube model these days.
vieris, have you ever seen a saturation curve of some electric circuit?
please tell me that this is just a joke

peace,
bootsie

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Wed May 28, 2008 6:28 pm

tonAP · Post by **tonAP** » Wed May 28, 2008 6:30 pm

bootsie /

/ vieris ?
Wow: grab popcorns

EDIT: Damnbduffy you burned me!!!

vieris · Post by **vieris** » Wed May 28, 2008 6:50 pm

Ouch. Here come the blows.
They are based of 2 waveshapper saturation codes off of musicdsp. If you want to know my method of reference I matched my favorite shapes from the am-suite.

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Wed May 28, 2008 8:40 pm

cool, why not just share some plots of your plug's saturation curves so we can learn and understand. See: users (like me) do have great expectations when they see words like 'tape'. Maybe my analyzer here is crap.
So your plug is modelled after am-suite? which one?

vieris · Post by **vieris** » Wed May 28, 2008 10:16 pm

Ok so I took some spectrograph screen shots. This shows frequency response over time.
My test is basic. 1k tone, I slowly bring the fader from nil to full level. All of these plugins can be tweaked to taste so everything here is variable. But you can get a good idea of how it will alter your audio.

vieris · Post by **vieris** » Wed May 28, 2008 10:28 pm

bootsie wrote:cool, why not just share some plots of your plug's saturation curves so we can learn and understand. See: users (like me) do have great expectations when they see words like 'tape'. Maybe my analyzer here is crap.
So your plug is modelled after am-suite? which one?

I just want to clarify that i didn't model this plug after the am-suite. But I was heavily influenced and used them as my bar to compare. I really respect Saschas work, & is something to work towards.

RunBeerRun · Post by **RunBeerRun** » Wed May 28, 2008 10:29 pm

The saturator sounds awesome, it mashes it up with the shape to the left, and saturates in a normal way to the right.

I'm going to send you another donation, saturations don't come along every day! And +1 on a multi band exciter, or any exciter!

Speakeasy · Post by **Speakeasy** » Wed May 28, 2008 10:41 pm

vieris : what spectrograph software you used on these tests?

looks nice...where to get it?

thanks for advice

ps.your plugs rock....

vieris · Post by **vieris** » Wed May 28, 2008 10:52 pm

It's the stock one built into reaper.

dimitar · Post by **dimitar** » Wed May 28, 2008 11:24 pm

vieris, great plugins!!!
Thank you!

RunBeerRun · Post by **RunBeerRun** » Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 am

Sat-1 into TesslaSe sounds pretty thick!

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Thu May 29, 2008 11:14 am

While reading that tube/tape labels I was just expecting to see some decent saturation curves. Instead it shows things like this (which has absolutely nothing todo with tube/tape saturation curves):

Maybe you just pickup Christians Analyzer so you get some more insights in what your plugs actually do. Just a proposal ...

peace,
bootsy

Cordelia · Post by **Cordelia** » Thu May 29, 2008 11:37 am

bootsie wrote:While reading that tube/tape labels I was just expecting to see some decent saturation curves. Instead it shows things like this (which has absolutely nothing todo with tube/tape saturation curves):

Maybe you just pickup Christians Analyzer so you get some more insights in what your plugs actually do. Just a proposal ...

peace,
bootsy

Huh. Not very polite. What your plugs actually do on my quad core, Bootsy, is freeze my comp every time I try to load them in Reaper, so...

nobody's perfect.

Anyway, thanks for these GIFTS vieris. Nice of you.

shanecgriffo · Post by **shanecgriffo** » Thu May 29, 2008 11:48 am

i use both bootsie's and vieris's plugins. and find them both useful..
thanks to both of you.. now kiss and make up ok

Module Series EQ, Comp, & Filters.