Mastering, how much should I limit ?

How to do this, that and the other. Share, learn, teach. How did X do that? How can I sound like Y?
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Alright, im going to master my latest track:

And its highly important i get the best result possible.

How much can i limit this before it loses dynamics?

Image

I know this all depens on everything else ofcourse, and that i should use my ears, but i need your input.

Post

As a guideline here are some settings for you:

Ratio: 2 to 1, or 1.5 to 1
Gain Reduction: On average you want no more than -2dB of gain reduction. Be sure to makeup the gain reduction on the output side; so if you are gain reducing -2dB with the compressor, add +2dB to the output stage.
Attack: Fairly fast attack and a moderate release. If you set your release too fast, your program material will pump. A lot of hip hop and dance music use fast releases to get the compressor to pump, but in general most other styles of music try to avoid hearing the compressor pump.

Whenever you are passing the majority of your program material through a compressor, you want to use very low ratios and use very moderate gain reduction as is spec'd above.
Last edited by anfmusic on Sat May 31, 2008 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Alphonse Faggiolo, Producer & Engineer
http://airplaydirect.com/music/bands/21470/index.php
21,000+ FREE music contacts & Resources.
http://MusicScroll.com

Post

Hi, thanks for the reply.

What i do, is i limit the the peaks. so i get a fairly flat waveform.

Like this:


Image

Then I add the Timeworks Mastering Compressor, which has not ratios or anything, and i get this:

Image

Post

is limiting the same as normalizing ?

Post

Then I add the Timeworks Mastering Compressor, which has not ratios or anything, and i get this:
Ouch!
Edit:
There are still a few nasty empty spaces to fill.. :hihi:
Last edited by tonAP on Fri May 30, 2008 10:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Post

7kilo wrote:is limiting the same as normalizing ?
No ...

Post

Ive used the Timeworks Mastering compressor for 4 years now on all my tracks, I like the sound and use of it.

Post

-edit- nm

Post

Well I think you'll get better results running first through a high quality compressor such as the SSL G Buss compressor, the Neve Buss Compressor, Fairchild 670, etc... and then run the compressed signal through a limiter/maximizer such as Timeworks. By running through the compressor first, your mix will be smoothed out a little and the peaks that remain will be the peaks that you can push over the limiter threshold, therefore raising the overall volume level of your mix.
Alphonse Faggiolo, Producer & Engineer
http://airplaydirect.com/music/bands/21470/index.php
21,000+ FREE music contacts & Resources.
http://MusicScroll.com

Post

Unfortunately Software compressors is all i can use.

Post

I think that @anfmusic explained it pretty well.

Anyway your first snapshot did show a nice dynamic-range; roughly
we could say mostly inside the 06db, then there are 2 patterns going slightly over 06db and, inside those, single (or short groups of) peaks going clearly more over. Those peaks should be your target for tame them smoot; this way you'll gain headroom so that when you'll increase the overall level, still there will be enough space to keep 'almost' the same average dynamic.

Sadly in your snapshot 2 you did already destroy allot of that dynamic, cutting heavvy at 06db. From that on (snapshot 3) you just 'zoomed' a cutted dynamic..

but since you asked for:
"How much can i limit this before it loses dynamics?"
Well you already lost it on step 2 (if you see what i mean).

Post

Should I bite?

-Kim.

Post

Kim (esoundz) wrote:Should I bite?

-Kim.
Yeah. I'm always hoping you'll show up in threads like these so I can learn something new myself.
So, please do.

Post

Subtle wrote:Alright, im going to master my latest track:

And its highly important i get the best result possible.

How much can i limit this before it loses dynamics?
Limiting IS losing dynamics.

But more to the point, why would you go for such a sqished waveform like in step 3?
I think pulling out every single bit of dynamics does no good.


Post

No_Use wrote:I think pulling out every single bit of dynamics does no good.
Well I wouldn't be so 'radical': sometimes pulling out a *few* db of peaks can help on bringing out the overall dynamics.. then it's the well known "matter of taste"

Post Reply

Return to “Production Techniques”