IIEQ Pro is getting a lot of praise so this is going to be the first one i try!
lol. I tried most your excellent plugins so indeed i will get this one too.bootsie wrote:BootEQ, of course
Sorry again. I wasn't thinking clearly, i really only had EQ on my mind and i was still working on a track. VitaminD is correct, i'm using windows.HobbyCore wrote:The OP didn't phrase his request very carefully. The title is 'what is your goto EQ', in the beginning post he doesn't mention his platform and hopes we can give him suggestions.VitaminD wrote:..besides DP is for Mac only.. from older posts it appears the OP (unless things have changed recently) is using a windows box..
I answered the thread title since the first post didn't make any logical sense to me.
Will demo these, thanks!adl wrote:I tested a lot of EQ's and found Precision EQ to be very easy to use. It has no "colouring" in sound but they offer the "Vintage EQ" as well, for more "warmth" and "character"
You are really making a lot of sense. To be honest, i don't exactly know which equalizer specifications will suit me best.jdtrbn wrote:Do you have any idea of the type of sound you're after?
A thing about EQs is that filter design is very tricky, but in the end the differences between different filter types can be very small. In the end, if you can use different EQs to get the same frequency curves, they will in most cases sound the same. A well-known designer said recently that it doesn't matter only what kind of a sound you'll get, but how you'll get it, meaning that a good EQ may point you to the right direction. An exception are linear phase vs. minimum phase EQs and saturation, filter band interaction and other kinds of analog modelling. Some professionals who have used analog EQs say that they hear no difference between plug-ins. So, I just want to say that a price tag doesn't make sound quality and a photo of an analog piece of gear in the interface doesn't make the sound any more analog. Also be aware that a good sounding EQ may just be one that uses a wide Q and doesn't tell you that (so you could actually achieve the same with a normal EQ).
Posihfopit and IIEQ are nice, LP10 is said to be good for linear phase. If you have money you can get PSP Neon.
When i use Live's EQ8 many times i can't shape the sound into what i want. On several occasions i worked with an SSL / Duende EQ and there i could shape the sounds to my liking, only i found that it took too long to get there. (Moving the mouse pointer from knob to knob takes longer than i.e. Ozone's EQ where you use your mousebutton to move a point and mousewheel to set bandwidth, apart from that i don't really like how it sounds).
I don't want to come across as lazy to turn more than one knob but i'm just after the increase in workflow when an EQ functions quick.
I know, love most Logic's plugins.djanthonyw wrote:Logic's default channel strip EQ.
Will check it out also! Thanks Christian.Christian Budde wrote:May I also suggest my infamous free noname EQ:
Simple, but powerful...
Yes, the SSL does sound great but doesn't 'work' for me at the moment. I tried voxengo's overtone before, maye i'll try it again. Guess i'll have to look into the Cambridge, i don't think i've ever heard it. The free Classic doesn't sound good enough. Thanks!susiwong wrote: - The best allrounder for me is the Duende SSL, sounds great for almost everything, reacts and feels like the EQ on a good hardware desk
- If all I need is to globally change basic character a bit, Pultec / Pro is hard to beat, sounds so smooth and natural it's scary
- For surgical operations (mostly cutting) it's Cambridge, the C4 EQ is also very good
- The UAD Neve EQs are fantastic, too - they'd get more use here if the GUI wouldn't have those concentric knobs, so I often tend to use the generic GUI
- a bit esoteric but might be just the ticket when all else fails is Voxengo Overtone EQ
- and finally an often overlooked ugly duckling, the free Classic EQ
susiwong





