help a newbie with neapolitan sixth

Chords, scales, harmony, melody, etc.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

jancivil wrote:NOT really like the b5 substitute for the dominant in bebop, as nuffink wants it to be, at all.
You know what? You're absolutely right, well done. I can't remember what point I was trying to make or even whether I was sober at the time. But then it was a month ago.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

someone called simon wrote:My oh my, I wish there was a thing whereby I could just click on the chord designation in these threads, and hear an audio file of it. In context, of course! I can follow about half of what's in here, but without formal theory training I can see the other half flying by slightly above my cranium somewhere...

My ears hear the N6 thing as a highbrow minor key version of what any number of folk/countryish songs might do, say in the key of D, finishing on the chords C, A7, D, with melody going C, C#, D.
Stick it in the relative minor and put those same melody notes over C, F#, Bm chords, give the C chord an E bass note and, voila, instant N6, yes?

I guess thats why I had trouble understanding that N6 terminology, my ears hear it as an inversion of a b2, not an augmented 4... despite what the common terminology is, my brain says the other thing when I hear it.

But those clickable chords would be nice to be able to hear the finer points. :D
Forget about that aug 4 or flat 5. (when you go from say ii (in C, a d minor) to a flat II (b5 or no), you are going from a 'subdominant' to a dominant, in function. EG: When you do the '7 b5' number on it, it's the same as V7 b5 (in C, Db F G B), therefore it functions as a dominant.

N6: Subdominant function. Plagal function (amen cadence is another example of subdom function) when it goes to i or I; or it proceeds to the dominant (which it does in your example).

Your chord progression gets the basic idea right, but ignores the context of voice-leading which the actual practice period arrived at to give us this harmony. (Which may or may not enrich the experience of this sound for you.)

Post

jancivil...

Re 1st para... yes , i see that 'functional' aspect. That's probably the description that ties most closely into how my ears hear things. Funny, I just remembered where I first heard that chord, and wondered what the hell it was.. a Bb7b5, resolving to an A (i think was the key). I definitely see how thats a dominant, a twist on an E chord. But the song I first heard it in was an Eagles song! How unlikely is that?!

Re 2nd para... N6 subdominant plagal cadence. Thats quite a nice sound. F/A to E (guitar chord point of view sneaking through)

Re 3rd para... No i don't know much about voice leading... but if I was to do another variation on the F/A to E thing... eg A6 to F7/B to E, and I'm picturing these notes, low to high:

A6: A, E, A, C#, F#
F7/B: B, Eb, A, C, F
E E, E G#, B, E

is that voice leading? I was kind of thinking it meant 4 part vocal harmonies, with Bach looking over your shoulder?

Post

Yes. Unless you're trying to sound like Bach, don't let him spook you.

Post

I heard that if you do a tritone substitution in Reason, it crashes like an unchecked divide by zero operation.

Post

someone called simon wrote:jancivil...

Re 1st para... yes , i see that 'functional' aspect. That's probably the description that ties most closely into how my ears hear things. Funny, I just remembered where I first heard that chord, and wondered what the hell it was.. a Bb7b5, resolving to an A (i think was the key). I definitely see how thats a dominant, a twist on an E chord. But the song I first heard it in was an Eagles song! How unlikely is that?!

Re 2nd para... N6 subdominant plagal cadence. Thats quite a nice sound. F/A to E (guitar chord point of view sneaking through)

Re 3rd para... No i don't know much about voice leading... but if I was to do another variation on the F/A to E thing... eg A6 to F7/B to E, and I'm picturing these notes, low to high:

A6: A, E, A, C#, F#
F7/B: B, Eb, A, C, F
E E, E G#, B, E

is that voice leading? I was kind of thinking it meant 4 part vocal harmonies, with Bach looking over your shoulder?
If anyone is going to write for orchestra, serious consideration of voice leading is a GOOD idea. to begin with 4 parts is "basic". Get that down first, is my advice. (you seem a quick study btw)

try this with your progression (I'm guessing the B/C 'clash' in the second chord is a bit much):

('part writing' aka voice-leading>horizontally; look at the vertical alignment for that aspect)

sopr: A - A - G#
alto: C# - B - B
ten.: E - D# - E
bass: F# - F - E

Post Reply

Return to “Music Theory”