Noooooo, I loved the turn to darker colours that came with Cubase 4! I hated all those lively colours that SX3 had and I was jealous of all those Nuendo guys with their dark blues and greys. So when I first saw Cubase 4 having the dark Nuendo colours I immediately fell in love with it.Compyfox wrote:And I'll DEFINITELY CHANGE the color settings for Cubase. Gee is that... ugly and dark toned. Simplified and better GUI? My ass. Hire grymmjack, people!
Steinberg Speaks
-
- KVRAF
- 2118 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Athens, Greece
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
well, I just can't help getting the feeling that instead of better daw features and such, it's just toys (I'm talking about sonar, logic and so on as well)
Seems that in the end, after the "oooooos and ahhhhhhs" what people would really want are greater editing, composition, rendering capabilities.
Seems that in the end, after the "oooooos and ahhhhhhs" what people would really want are greater editing, composition, rendering capabilities.
-
- KVRAF
- 6272 posts since 25 Mar, 2004
Well, I'm not changing hosts. Cubase is my universe. I'm going to keep upgrading, regardless, because I want the most up to date version of the program.plastique wrote:I don't see a fuss either, just thought it's a nice addition. Not something I'd change hosts for, if another has this already available. Milages vary of course ... Seems to be the Yamaha Pitch-fix technology according to the other leak that's travelling around the net.
So as long as I'm doing that, let them cram in as much as possible.
-B
Berfab
So many plugins, so little time...
So many plugins, so little time...
-
- KVRAF
- 14740 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
I guess ProTools still outbeats everybody. But I hate the lock to the hardware.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I have to say it's really easy in the eyes to me. I never really think about it. Hmmmmm, that reminds me, I wish the color controlling was a bit more complex....like "change all groups" or "change all audio". Seems no matter what setup I use in the preferences, I struggle to keep my colors proper.geroyannis wrote:Noooooo, I loved the turn to darker colours that came with Cubase 4! I hated all those lively colours that SX3 had and I was jealous of all those Nuendo guys with their dark blues and greys. So when I first saw Cubase 4 having the dark Nuendo colours I immediately fell in love with it.Compyfox wrote:And I'll DEFINITELY CHANGE the color settings for Cubase. Gee is that... ugly and dark toned. Simplified and better GUI? My ass. Hire grymmjack, people!
-
- KVRAF
- 14740 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Actually I did tone down my Cubase SX3 to a more darker tone, but not THAT dark and flat. If I want Ableton Live, I go for Ableton Live. But I don't like Live, so there you go.bM3w wrote: Hmmm...you really must hate dark tones, which is probably why your own website is all dark, huh?
Any proof or written info abour that? If you get C5 for free if you get C4 now... I'd go for it to save some money. SAme with Wavelab. Depending on the new upgrade price, too. Chances are that Steinberg say "even more tools, even more money for upgrading". They did that from SX3 to C4 at least. From 120 to 160Euro or something.ericj23 wrote:i got a grace period upgrade from 3 to 4 so errr...... they do
Last edited by Compyfox on Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I'd put up with the hardware to some degree if there was PDC. I simply cannot be without that, can't deal with it.Compyfox wrote:I guess ProTools still outbeats everybody. But I hate the lock to the hardware.
One thing cubase is really good at.
-
- TopModernGeezer
- 2679 posts since 14 Mar, 2001 from Stuttgart, Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 2609 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
how do i prove it ?????Compyfox wrote:Any proof or written info abour that? If you get C5 for free if you get C4 now... I'd go for it to save some money. SAme with Wavelab. Depending on the new upgrade price, too. Chances are that Steinberg say "even more tools, even more money for upgrading". They did that from SX3 to C4 at least. From 120 to 160Euro or something.ericj23 wrote:i got a grace period upgrade from 3 to 4 so errr...... they do
Thinking about it I bought a cubase 5 to sx 2 update. Steinberg were saying it was then or never for that upgrade, as they were going to discontinue it. I jumped right at the end of that period and very shortly afterwards 3 was released - I got a free update to that
what can I do to prove this ???
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRAF
- 4071 posts since 4 Mar, 2008 from Near Pittsburgh
I mainly use Cubase but in my use of Pro Tools LE to "keep my chops up" I just threw $50 MellowMuse's way and was done with the PDC issue. Don't use it every day compared to Cubase which I do but it seems solid.hibidy wrote:I'd put up with the hardware to some degree if there was PDC. I simply cannot be without that, can't deal with it.Compyfox wrote:I guess ProTools still outbeats everybody. But I hate the lock to the hardware.
One thing cubase is really good at.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I had no idea that exsistedbuscemi wrote:I mainly use Cubase but in my use of Pro Tools LE to "keep my chops up" I just threw $50 MellowMuse's way and was done with the PDC issue. Don't use it every day compared to Cubase which I do but it seems solid.hibidy wrote:I'd put up with the hardware to some degree if there was PDC. I simply cannot be without that, can't deal with it.Compyfox wrote:I guess ProTools still outbeats everybody. But I hate the lock to the hardware.
One thing cubase is really good at.
-
- KVRAF
- 14740 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Neither do I, I'm so SOLD. Even though I blow one of my 5 available insert per channelstrip in LE. But HECK if I can do Latency Compensation and save on CPU due to that... why not.
RTAS and TDM in a pro Environment? I wish we had this at the academy!
RTAS and TDM in a pro Environment? I wish we had this at the academy!
-
- KVRAF
- 13446 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Ok, first off: At least Steinberg *does* update their sequencers. Apple for instance doesn't. A clear winner.
And then, I think they're really trying to compete with Logic (which has always been their main opponent, kinda traditionally). Regarding that, they seem to be doing well. I can't see anything bad in what is packed into Cubase 5, especially assuming that there'll be quite some more features which just don't make it into whatever spectacular news.
I'll defenitely bite this time and order the update from SX3 more or less soon.
- Sascha
And then, I think they're really trying to compete with Logic (which has always been their main opponent, kinda traditionally). Regarding that, they seem to be doing well. I can't see anything bad in what is packed into Cubase 5, especially assuming that there'll be quite some more features which just don't make it into whatever spectacular news.
I'll defenitely bite this time and order the update from SX3 more or less soon.
- Sascha
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- KVRAF
- 4749 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
maybe 50 new BSOD'S ?
knowing the track record.
knowing the track record.
Sascha Franck wrote:I can't see anything bad in what is packed into Cubase 5,
