New updates v2. - Coming 15th January: energyXT 2.5

[ret]

Eventhough he isn't making much sense it's kinda cool that there is one fan boy left hehehehehehe

NAS

I still like XT2 (I have really hard time using this 2.5 number, hehe) as a writing tool because it's interface is so damn good.

But XT2 has been out long enough to see where it goes and it doesn't look very promising. If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

[D.J.T.]

This place is going to implode soon

[S.HUSH]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Edit: updates meaning new features etc.

[.jon]

I've been out of the loop for some time, and to me this update doesn't look all that bad.



Slow development, that's all, not end of the world.

[S.HUSH]

I've been out of the loop for some time, and to me this update doesn't look all that bad.



Slow development, that's all, not end of the world.

It's personally working like a champ for me. The automation bug is gone and i'm working it. The thing that never fails to impress me is the load up time.

[phraggle]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Well, to be honest I'd have to say that major "release" usually *does* equate to major "update", at least with practically all the software I've ever bought.

[NAS]

OK S.HUSH

1 You said Xt software is a solo effort = Bullshit

2 You said this is a full release and from here we get updates = Show any proof or an example in recent times of XT being updated or erm Bullshit

3 Answer my question. How do I not make sense? = Demanding stuff that comes across as total arrogance and makes you even more hilarious hahahahahaha


Go on type something else now, The hole isn't that deep yet hahahaha

NAS

PS Do you work for XT software ?
Even one of the previous employees is in this thread very dissapointed too hahahaha

[S.HUSH]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Well, to be honest I'd have to say that major "release" usually *does* equate to major "update", at least with practically all the software I've ever bought.

That's pretty much what I just said.

[Rottweiler]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Well, to be honest I'd have to say that major "release" usually *does* equate to major "update", at least with practically all the software I've ever bought.

That's pretty much what I just said.

you are talkin bullshit

[phraggle]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Well, to be honest I'd have to say that major "release" usually *does* equate to major "update", at least with practically all the software I've ever bought.

That's pretty much what I just said.

Well, the first sentence in your post pretty much contradicts the second sentence. My post was aimed at the first sentence.

[S.HUSH]

OK S.HUSH

1 You said Xt software is a solo effort = Bullshit

No, i said "pretty much" a solo effort. There's a difference.

2 You said this is a full release and from here we get updates = Show any proof or an example in recent times of XT being updated or erm Bullshit

What does "recent times" have anything to do with my point of XTs official release (today) being a solid stepping stone for updates?

And for the sake of arguement, "recent times" is relative.

Demanding stuff that comes across as total arrogance and makes you even more hilarious

Do you work for XT software ?

No, I just like pissing off whiny geeks.

[aMUSEd]

I've been out of the loop for some time, and to me this update doesn't look all that bad.



Slow development, that's all, not end of the world.

It's personally working like a champ for me. The automation bug is gone and i'm working it. The thing that never fails to impress me is the load up time.

Yes so far it hasn't crashed for me while using automation which is all I wanted apart from dualcore support.

[NAS]

Hhahahahahaha i'm a whiny geek am i hahahahaha

Dude you are so hilarious it is unbelievable hahahahaha
You aren't pissing any one off
YOU ARE ENTERTANING US
You are like those muppets on X factor that actually believe they can sing (You know the ones dont you )

People like you always make me laugh because your online persona is your control right hahahahahaha
I bet you wouldn't dare say boo to anyone in the real wide world would you hahahahahahahahaha

Man please keep typing im loving this

NAS

[S.HUSH]

If they've been coding all the time why didn't any of that show on such as "major update".

Major "release" has nothing to do with "updates". It has been common practice to have updates for new releases, yes, but not necessarily the rule.

Well, to be honest I'd have to say that major "release" usually *does* equate to major "update", at least with practically all the software I've ever bought.

That's pretty much what I just said.

Well, the first sentence in your post pretty much contradicts the second sentence. My post was aimed at the first sentence.

I said in the second sentence, it's common practice BUT NOT NECESSARILY THE RULE..which somewhat coincides with the first sentence.

[lama2]

Oh f**k it. Someone should post a Sticky to warn people that eventually want to buy this software, that there isn't a working sequencer for the money they are spending for it.
But who wonders, Behringer is known for products, that look professional, but if you use them, they are nothing more than crap. And that's what XT is too.
big piss take
I can't even sell my license to someone without the feeling to betray him.