New updates v2. - Coming 15th January: energyXT 2.5
-
- KVRist
- 476 posts since 6 Aug, 2004
Oh Lord , the whole xt thing has finally gone the route of Tracktion
, great promise and finally a collection of bugs that stay in for much to long
,no significant changes in over 4 months , the nail in the coffin for
most of the userbase im afraid, the quest for another daw is on
, great promise and finally a collection of bugs that stay in for much to long
,no significant changes in over 4 months , the nail in the coffin for
most of the userbase im afraid, the quest for another daw is on
-
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 24 Mar, 2004 from Finland
to S.HUSH:
Please take a little look at the new Sonar 8.3 update to see what updates usually mean. With XT 2.5 there is basically nothing that "deserves" the 2.5 status. If anything it should be called as 2.1 and even for that it would be quite pointless as there ain't anything newsworthy.
But I guess it's easier to cash XT 2.5 at NAMM 2009 rather than same software called as XT2?
Please take a little look at the new Sonar 8.3 update to see what updates usually mean. With XT 2.5 there is basically nothing that "deserves" the 2.5 status. If anything it should be called as 2.1 and even for that it would be quite pointless as there ain't anything newsworthy.
But I guess it's easier to cash XT 2.5 at NAMM 2009 rather than same software called as XT2?
-
afreshcupofjoe afreshcupofjoe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=94815
- KVRAF
- 1838 posts since 17 Jan, 2006 from Portland, OR
Goodbye XT2. I had a little hope left, but it is now gone for good. I will continue to use eXT 1.4 as my swiss army knife plugin, but I'm deleting XT2 from my HD and won't be checking updates anymore. What a complete waste. 
"The Juno 60 was often incorrectly referred to as a synth. It is, in fact, a chorus unit with a synth attached." -PAK
-
- KVRAF
- 3008 posts since 2 May, 2006 from Liquor store
You obviously haven't seen the cute little blocks on the volume meter have you?ret wrote:to S.HUSH:
With XT 2.5 there is basically nothing that "deserves" the 2.5 status.
Right-o. XT2.5 has a "ring" to it.
But I guess it's easier to cash XT 2.5 at NAMM 2009 rather than same software called as XT2?[
- KVRAF
- 37409 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Just tried the plugin - seems to still be on the old version??? (and that does crash)
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
You'd hope so. Otherwise, it's hard to work out what exactly he's been doing for the last 5 months.masstronaut wrote:We'll see if those updates start coming. At least the entertainment here is free, you don't even need a license!
I'd pay again to see 1.4 finished off. A lot of talk goes on about how the 1.4 users should just put up and shut up because they're getting a free update. Well, it ain't an update. It's a completely different program, and a big slide backwards in many of the aspects that originally compelled me to spend the money.
And while I'm not joining the witchhunt, what direction is that exactly, Shush?Shush wrote:]Jorgen is making the best move for his company and I support it because I like the direction it is going. Slowly but surely.
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 13 Sep, 2004
Man lets not get into v1.4 and the free update thing hahahahahahah
I'm staying calm here and S.HUSH is helping bless him
But if we start to get into why this app got called v2 i .......ah screw it who cares anymore hahahahahahahaha
Behringer will own XT2 soon and it will dissapear into nothingness so who cares
NAS
I'm staying calm here and S.HUSH is helping bless him
But if we start to get into why this app got called v2 i .......ah screw it who cares anymore hahahahahahahaha
Behringer will own XT2 soon and it will dissapear into nothingness so who cares
NAS
Omerta
-
- KVRAF
- 3008 posts since 2 May, 2006 from Liquor store
robenestobenz wrote:And while I'm not joining the witchhunt, what direction is that exactly, Shush?Shush wrote:]Jorgen is making the best move for his company and I support it because I like the direction it is going. Slowly but surely.

How's MULAB coming along?
actually I like MULAB so i wont dis.
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
Yeah, all over the place. That as good as an image as I could wish for in my impression of the direction of travel in XT2's development.S.HUSH wrote:robenestobenz wrote:And while I'm not joining the witchhunt, what direction is that exactly, Shush?S.HUSH wrote:Jorgen is making the best move for his company and I support it because I like the direction it is going. Slowly but surely.
I don't know if you're trying to be snarky here, as it's a bit of an inane thing to bring into the thread. I'll bite anyway: rather well actually, thanks. There's a lot of usability things the XTs do better, but it's turning out very useful for what I bought it for.S.HUSH wrote:How's MULAB coming along?
actually I like MULAB so i wont dis.
Last edited by robenestobenz on Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 483 posts since 7 Aug, 2005 from Germany
besides the flames going on here, and stating that 2.5 actually is an update to the original release, it's righteous to say that this release is nothing but disappointing especially considering the immature state of development 
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 13 Sep, 2004
Yeah it's definatly an update to the original release but not worthy of a .5 update and lets be honest here the whole reason for the .5 update is to get it into news stories from NAMM right,gamble wrote:besides the flames going on here, and stating that 2.5 actually is an update to the original release, it's righteous to say that this release is nothing but disappointing especially considering the immature state of development
Funny thing is as far as i can tell it has failed miserably
NAS
Omerta
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
It's not even that I mind so much. It's the fact it's months older than the last 2.0x beta. I keep hoping there's been an accident the wrong version was branded 2.5 and shunted out the door and that Jorgen's gonna come out and clear all this up.gamble wrote:besides the flames going on here, and stating that 2.5 actually is an update to the original release, it's righteous to say that this release is nothing but disappointing especially considering the immature state of development
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 13 Sep, 2004
Yeah at first my reaction was "Hes given the web developer a 2.5 to do a screen shot months ago for the new site and those idiots have not only made a mess of the site but posted the wrong EXE"
lets see
NAS
lets see
NAS
Omerta
- KVRAF
- 37409 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Well it's definitely more stable than any beta or full release I've tried so far. Are you saying its lost some features the beta had?robenestobenz wrote:It's not even that I mind so much. It's the fact it's months older than the last 2.0x beta. I keep hoping there's been an accident the wrong version was branded 2.5 and shunted out the door and that Jorgen's gonna come out and clear all this up.gamble wrote:besides the flames going on here, and stating that 2.5 actually is an update to the original release, it's righteous to say that this release is nothing but disappointing especially considering the immature state of development
