It's indeed an amazing NAMM this year compared to the last two ones.
Even more dissapointing will be Musikmesse 2009 this years, I'm afraid. Like last years (where I could almost count tumbleweed). Because, what will they have to present?
Unless those who have anniversaries are like "one tool at each event". Since there are 3-4 major events this year, this makes a nice guessing game. And definitely some unique presentations. Then again, I don't think that this will happen.
But... I hope to see Muse Research at Musikmesse again. I definitely want to take a look at the new Receptor "MuseBox"
Looks like an awesome NAMM this year!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 14740 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
-
- KVRian
- 809 posts since 24 May, 2005
Hi koolkeys,koolkeys wrote:
I missed the Ableton Live presentation(they had several DIFFERENT presentations), but there was a big buzz around them including Max/MSP inside of it. I think that was the announcement of the show for those who did see it.
Brent
Thanks for sharing the news with us. Sonic State has a video of the Ableton Live Controller presentation, it will cost $399.00.
http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2009/01/ ... -unveiled/
I hope you enjoyed the NAMM-CAM Pacemaker Dancers.
http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2009/01/ ... r-dancers/
Alex.
-
- KVRian
- 650 posts since 7 Oct, 2006
Well, I mean real editing of pitch like Samplitude and Digital performer had now for a couple of years - but, surely, by their definition, Steinberg was the first to implement it, and I guess it will be ridiculous - as ever - to question that ....poonna wrote:I think Sonar has had that (V-Vocal) since a couple of versions ago?steff3 wrote:It will be funny how all the Cubase user will from now on say that Steinberg was the first dev to implement pitch correction in any DAW
- it is all just a matter of how people want to view things ...(What is nice about Cubase implementation - if it ever works - is that they also transfer pitch bend info to MIDI, which DP does not do for the moment - strangely ...)
best
Last edited by steff3 on Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRian
- 650 posts since 7 Oct, 2006
Quite interesting - personally I found last year much better - DP6, I think some Roland news and so on ... seems just to depend on what people are waiting for - if it concerns one it is considered to be better ....Compyfox wrote:It's indeed an amazing NAMM this year compared to the last two ones.
One thing that is really cool, but honestly, I do not know if I would ever need that is MOTU VOLTA, to integrate analog synths (CV controlled) directly in youd DAW - that is interesting. Maybe I should start looking around for analog modular systems slowly
This and the better support for expressions in MIDI sequencers (C5) seem to be the highlights for me ....
oh, and of course - Max for Live ....
best
-
- KVRAF
- 1628 posts since 3 Oct, 2001 from Thailand
Ah, got it now.steff3 wrote:Well, I mean real editing of pitch like Samplitude and Digital performer had now for a couple of years - but, surely, by their definition, Steinberg was the first to implement it, and I guess it will be ridiculous - as ever - to question that ....
(What is nice about Cubase implementation - if it ever works - is that they also transfer pitch bend info to MIDI, which DP does not do for the moment - strangely ...)
best
Peace, my friends. I'm not seeking arguments here.
-
- KVRAF
- 2211 posts since 2 Jan, 2003 from right here...
...because there isn't such a thing. But if you stack up FM8, Absynth and Massive you'll get quite a huge synth mama...Igro wrote:Why NI just can't create the mother of all synths? So huge company.(don't tell about reactor)
-
- KVRist
- 45 posts since 30 Nov, 2002 from Canada
Roland has released V-Piano, which does not use samples, but physical modeling. This could be huge, but may be very expensive.
http://www.rolandus.com/products/produc ... arentId=72
Lawrence
http://www.rolandus.com/products/produc ... arentId=72
Lawrence
-
- KVRian
- 650 posts since 7 Oct, 2006
they are 'Native' Instruments - maybe this means something to them. I think business wise it would not make much sense - if the use PC-technology for a hardware synth they would step into competition with partners (there are some outside who so that stuff), if they use dsps they would need to recode things etc -Igro wrote:Why NI just can't create the mother of all synths? So huge company.(don't tell about reactor)
best
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
Well, the pitch correction is NOT in the main project view. It's a new window that opens. It works almost exactly like Samplitude works, but with a couple of small differences. But it's NOT part of the main window.steff3 wrote:Yes, I think this is a step in the right direction. judging from the screenshots I do not like how they implemented that, but I hope that other devs will follow (the mac ones especially - MOTU and Emagic/Apple) ....koolkeys wrote: sounds really really good(granted, they always use ideal vocal tracks). Also, for large sample library users, VST Expression will be cool. But the library has to support it, I think.
It will be funny how all the Cubase user will from now on say that Steinberg was the first dev to implement pitch correction in any DAW and tempo editing in the Project view - but well, after all those years we got used to their special views
best
Brent
My host is better than your host
-
- KVRist
- 371 posts since 27 May, 2007
Audition has had it as well since at least 1.5 (the earliest version I had, so I don't know about earlier).poonna wrote:I think Sonar has had that (V-Vocal) since a couple of versions ago?steff3 wrote:It will be funny how all the Cubase user will from now on say that Steinberg was the first dev to implement pitch correction in any DAW